Which would you prefer: pay more money to Iran to terrorize us?

Ross Rant (investment letter) reports: "Many people decry the war as disrupting the market or the economy and isn’t this terrible. The Dems and media take every opportunity to attack Trump and declare the war illegal or by choice or whatever. Yes, it was by choice. The real question is, would you prefer to have a few months of economic disruption or Iran with nukes and permanent control of Hormuz. It is that simple. If we were to follow the Obama/Biden policies of paying money to Iran, and letting them build up their proxy forces, and terrorist networks then the damage to the US would be far greater over time. Trump took a decision that had to made to save the world and Israel from a far more dangerous and risky history. There is no question if he had not acted in June and now, it would have been too late. The Dems and media hate Trump so much they are blind to reality of the world beyond US politics. The Obama policies toward Iran, followed by Biden, were enablers of terror and of nuclear blackmail and potential devastation. The JPOCA deal was the most irresponsible treaty ever signed since Munich in 1938, and was done so despite Netanyahu coming to Congress to say so. He was right then. The parallels are very obvious which is why I consistently say today is 1938 2.0."

My thoughts exactly. Obama got us here, now someone needs to stop empowering Iran to be a military and nuclear power. If you think Dems in Congress are outraged now, imagine how they'd rage at Trump if Iran lobbed a few bombs into Hawaii or California. I haven't forgotten how they blamed Bush for not stopping 9/11, or even pausing to think when he was told the news during a visit to a classroom.