US Code, Title 1, ch. 7: "In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife."
Wednesday, September 05, 2012
What is she trying to figure out?
Her president is offering her free birth control so he won’t have to discuss the economy, but what she’d really like is a job so she can pay her bills.
Who’s Obama’s brother’s keeper?
"Barack Obama Jr. first met George [Obama] in 1987, when George was five years old. He met George again in 2006 when he visited Kenya as a U.S. Senator from Illinois; George was then in his early twenties. Had Obama helped George along the way, perhaps this young man would not have ended up dirt-poor and living such a degraded life. So what’s the real story here? Where’s George Obama’s “fair share”? George’s tragic situation exposes President Obama as a hypocrite."
Barack Obama is an extremely wealthy man--not as rich as Romney by any means, but he's in the 1% easily. And even if he loses in November, he will probably draw a bigger speaking salary than Clinton, who has become enormously wealthy. He could be helping all his siblings and never miss it. Instead, he wants my money.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/16/how-became-george-obama-brother/
Catholics for Choice at the DNC
“There are just under 300 active U.S. bishops . . . and neither they, nor their lobbying arm, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, really speak for the 68 million U.S. Catholics who share the belief that the use of contraception and the decision to end a pregnancy can be moral decisions and rightly should be made by individuals in accordance with their own conscience,” says Sara Hutchinson, domestic-program director of Catholics for Choice speaking to 6 people who showed up for her talk at the DNC convention in Charlotte.
Catholics for Choice are supported by foundations, are not considered Catholics by the church and do not represent any of the teachings of the Catholic Church. And apparently they can't even draw much of a crowd, even with the anti-Catholic press on hand.
Maybe my math is weak, but I think the Bishops speak for many more than this organization.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/315896/planned-parenthood-s-little-army-katrina-trinko
What has Obama done for the poor?
We know what Obama has done to the wealthy; what he's done to the middle class. He's redistributed their income and passed the largest tax increase in our history. But what has he done for the poor, the minorities, the people who depend on coal mining, or the oil industry in the gulf; what has he done for women--really--other than tossing birth control like M&Ms at them? What has he done for small business, the engine of the economy, other than slapping them with more regulations and impossible to follow insurance laws?
Today’s Wall Street Journal Review and Outlook reported: "The food-stamp boom began with the George W. Bush Republicans, who expanded benefits in the appalling 2002 farm bill. But the supercharger was a 2008 bill out of the Pelosi Congress that goosed eligibility and rebranded the program as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, to reduce the stigma of being on the dole. Then there was the 2009 stimulus, which expanded the program again. Liberals argued then and still do that food stamps are one of the most effective ways the government can juice the economy. Really, they claim to believe this. . . "
Since the recession supposedly ended three years ago (before the stimulus package could even take effect) and Obama floated a massive stimulus and still the rolls grow, that obviously hasn't worked.
A woman earning $29,000 a year with Uncle Sam as her live in lover, can receive many government benefits to bring her usable income to that of someone earning $69,000. Where is her incentive to kick Sam to the curb under this president?
The news about HIV/AIDS isn’t good
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was introduced 25 years ago, and thus there are now millions living with AIDS rather than dying from AIDS. ART is even providing protection for those who don’t yet have HIV infection. That’s good, right? Not so fast.
JAMA, July 25, 2012: “In the United States, 1.2 million people are estimated to be living with HIV infection—20% are unaware of their infection—and about 50,000 people are estimated to become infected each year. The cumulative number of AIDS deaths is approaching 650,000. The most severely affected groups include men who have sex with men, blacks, and Hispanics or Latinos.”

Plus, ART doesn’t remove the increase in heart disease, cancer, dementia, low bone mass, co-infections with other venereal diseases and psychological problems of AIDS patients, plus a sense of invulnerability has returned and young gay men are back to the irresponsible, casual sex habits of the men who spread the epidemic back in the 1970s and 1980s.

This is fuzzy, but the top blue line is those living with undiagnosed HIV infection. The flat red line at the bottom is AIDS deaths.
There are two articles in this special JAMA issue on HIV/AIDS (July 25, 2012) that deal with the future. Would you believe neither suggest celibacy or chastity as weapons in this battle? Yet both are completely effective. Monogamy and marriage will not eliminate this scourge as long as gay men continue to bring the disease to the marriage bed and infect women, who in turn infect children.
Decision and choice
…"The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay."
Some studies show that as many as >60% are coerced into this “decision” by parents, boyfriend, spouse. Where does a 17 year old go if Mom says it’s either Planned Parenthood or no funds for college, or you’re out on the street, or I will take away your smart phone?
Tuesday, September 04, 2012
She’s is so done with liberals, progressives, socialists, etc.
“I started out as a working man’s Democrat gung-ho for Clinton back in 2007. But watching the sexist mauling of Clinton and Palin by Obama’s frat boys while the press hurled charges of racism against anyone who dared criticize the creepy community organizer made me mad. I was so angry I finally coughed up the liberal Kool-aid and purged my system of the rot-gut drink I’d been swallowing for decades.
It’s been liberating. After toeing the liberal line for so long with all that political correctness I felt like I was trudging through quicksand with twenty pound weights. Defending the parasitic, oppressed masses and their entitled cries for “more, more” while trying to feed my own family on less and less, was sheer insanity.
I’ve heard people in self-help programs say they are grateful for all of their troubles, grateful for their dysfunctional spouses, parents, children, employees and friends because those circumstances and people woke them up. Well, it took a sociopathic Marxist to make me a pro-life principled real grass-roots conservative.
There’s freedom in true conservatism: freedom from anger, resentment, victimhood, dependency on government and hatred. They say conservatives give more to charitable causes. I believe it. Ever since I threw off the chains of liberalism, I feel more giving. If a co-worker slaving away at three jobs needs something, I’m there. When the usher passes around the basket at church I put in a little more than I used to, and I’m checking out area organizations truly dedicated to those who can’t help themselves and seeing how I can be of service. “
http://potterwilliamsreport.com/2012/01/07/obama-presidency-exposed-creepy-cronies.aspx
Who would want to be middle class?
When I was young, or even when I was middle age, politicians talked about helping the poor. Now they talk about helping the middle class. Maybe it’s because if a woman earns $29,000 a year (low income) and has 2 children, she qualifies for enough benefits from the government that she’d need a job that paid $69,000 a year to leave poverty and move up to the middle class. So if she took time out to go to college so she could earn more money, and then had to pay off loans too (supplied by the government), it’s possible she just couldn’t get ahead and would rather stay poor.

Should women be allowed to vote?
Frankly, I'm shocked that Democratic women are falling for this war on women, free contraception, Mitt will put us in chastity belts meme. If anything makes it look like we didn't deserve the vote 90 years ago, it's this issue. Hello--$16 trillion in debt; expanding the wars; exploding the clutch of czars; removing consumer rights; making health care industry an arm of the federal government when it can't manage Medicare and Medicaid.

2016 Obama’s America
We’re planning to see the documentary “2016 Obama’s America “today, although I'm not sure I want any more bad news about Obama than I already know. I realized in 2008 he was completely out of touch with the average American and that he didn't like us much. Finding out why won't help much. You are called a racist if you say he isn’t one of us, but he doesn’t act or sound like any politician, black, white, or brown, liberal or conservative that I’ve known before, but he has all the slick tools to accomplish with his mentors and cronies what he wants. Whether it was the politics of his parents and grandparents or because he was raised in his formative years outside the U.S., I don’t know, but he doesn’t know us, doesn’t understand us, and he hopes to end the U.S. that has become his enemy.

Update: It was different than I expected. The New Yorker says it is propaganda, but believe me, I see way more anti-Obama propaganda than I care to report, and some is really awful and poorly researched. D'Sousa uses Obama's own words, the audio of his book and his political speeches--at length--he doesn't do snippets. He also uses our $16 trillion dollar debt to come to his final conclusion. Neither are propaganda.
American Airlines—needs to respond
I was listening to Glenn Beck's account on his radio show of his rude treatment by an American Airlines employee, who said he deserved it when Glenn mentioned it to him. Even other passengers where noticing. The guy didn't like his politics (libertarian), or maybe his religion (Mormon), or perhaps his state (Texas). Glenn often talks about the importance of good service, because his parents owned a bakery and he worked there as a teen.
AA’s employee was not a good representative for a service industry that takes our money. A complaint has been filed. So we'll see. Glenn and his employees won't be flying AA anymore he said, and I'm guessing after that description neither will some of his 10 million listeners, users of his TV network, his book clubs, or buyers of his best selling books, or those books he publishes for others. He's a bigger communications phenomenon than Oprah (who hasn't succeeded in launching her own TV network, and he has). There's a steward working for AA who needs some retraining on keeping his politics to himself.
Update: Glenn reported last night he had received a response and AA says they will investigate.
Gorgeous curls
I got my hair cut today. Oh my. It’s so easy now (gray). 15 minutes and I’m done. Anyway, I was watching another stylist work on the most gorgeous head of white hair across the room. I could see nothing but the face in the mirror and the body was covered. She just fluffed and fingered and the result was lovely. Imagine my surprise when she took off the cape and it was a husky, tall, 50-ish man!
Monday, September 03, 2012
After he saw 2016, the movie
He thought some of the talk show hosts on the right sounded too scripted in their enthusiasm for the new documentary about Obama. So he went to see it himself—some applauded when it was over, but he was upset.
“Those who have already decided to vote for Obama will probably not even see the movie. It’s sad but they probably don’t want to know the truth when it is laid out so clearly for them in this documentary. The independents who are still deciding who they are going to vote for ought to see this film. I’m quite confident that any undecided voter who sees this film will know who to vote for after viewing this documentary. If you know you’re not going to support the “left” in this coming election, see the film out of interest if you like. But, fair warning, it’s disturbing – and quite frightening – to say the least.
Scott Paulson writes political news and commentary for CBS Local and Examiner.com and teaches English at a community college in the Chicago area.
Democrats require a photo ID for the convention
It is said that the Democrats will be bussing college students and union members into the convention in Charlotte, because the seats won’t be filled. In any case, they are very strict about IDs. Just not for voting.
Hope and Chair
Today is Empty Chair Day. All over the country people are putting empty chairs on the lawn, drive way, balcony, and taking photos and circulating them. We all got Clint Eastwood’s message. Here’s mine:
Today is Empty Chair Day
To support Clint Eastwood’s conversation with an empty chair at the Republican convention, put an empty chair in your yard today.
Monday Memories—The Wedding Dress
I came across this photo today in a package of photos I was planning to send my niece, Cindy, my sister Carol’s daughter. She’s the young lady in the photo, and it was in a file of my Aunt Muriel, who died in 2011 and her daughter gave me some photos to return to family members.
Here’s what I know from the note on the back of the photo. The occasion was a display of family mementoes at the Church of the Brethren in Mt. Morris, Illinois, for the bi-centennial in 1976. My mother and her sister Muriel had a few items that belonged to their grandmother, Susan George, who had travelled to Illinois as a bride in 1855 from Pennsylvania. This seems to be Susan’s wedding dress, as it looks like the dress in the only photo we have of her, so we’re assuming it was saved for that reason. The photo isn’t very clear, but I think the item in the plastic bag is her straw bonnet. In those days, Brethren women kept their heads covered, but the bonnets might be a simple covering with ties of sheer white net, or a straw hat, or black bonnet for Sunday dress. I don’t know where the dress is now, but I have the black bonnet.
Because of the 70s fashions, I’m not sure if Cindy is wearing her own dress with lacy sleeves, or if she might also be wearing a gown of the 19th century. I’ll have to ask her and update this when I find out.

