Sarah's not as skilled at the dodge

The other three are much more evasive, but just more experienced at hiding from the voter, according the the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has gotten the most heat for being evasive in this season of political debates, but new research suggests that the contrast between her and the other top-of-the-ticket candidates has less to do with her lack of responsiveness than with the three senators’ skill at dodging questions without seeming to.

When she point blank told Gwen Ifill that she was going to change the subject--I almost cheered, because I've been waiting for a candidate, any candidate, to tell the press the question is either stupid or out of line, but apparently voters are so accustomed to the clever dodge and weave play

"Voters say they prefer candid politicians, but the experiments suggest politicians may pay a higher price for intellectual honesty than dishonesty.

“When (Palin) acknowledged the question and said, ‘I don’t want to talk about it,’ it was intellectually honest, but it alerted people that she was not going to answer the question,”

Gwen Ifill needs to recuse herself

The public's trust in the news media is maybe a few notches higher than Congress, but not much. Why the Commission on Presidential Debates needs someone selected from the news media is a mystery to me. They read and write text for a living--they are no better informed than a blogger from Ohio who reads and writes for fun, their faces and voices just are recognizable. Why not someone who doesn't make a living catering to politicians at the local, state and national level? It's OK for them to go out and explain weather to the kindergartners or cut ribbons at the opening of new nursing homes, but let's give them a night off during the debates. She has a serious conflict of interest, and McCain is a wimp for not objecting. There would be no reason for Obama to object--he knows the press is in his hip pocket wallet.

PBS sure gets their shorts in a knot over someone else's perceived conflict of interest.