Do you remember Velma Hart?

I blogged about her back in September 25, 2010.  She was at a Town hall meeting with President Obama and calmly confronted him with her concerns about the economy.  She made a big media splash, and frankly, I didn’t buy it.  I thought she was a plant so he could look caring and reasonable.  But. . . I followed up on my own story, and it seems I was wrong.  She lost her job with a non-profit (I was wrong in my blog about her job—I thought she worked for the government but it was AmVets)  in November 2010, just 2 months later.  However, I kept poking around, and found that in 2011 she did indeed have another job with a different non-profit, and I thought her resume looked extremely good and the title of the position was impressive, although I don’t know if the salary matched what she had before.

Then I kept looking, wondering if she still supported Obama in 2012 and for the next four years and found out someone else wondered too.

“I still don’t feel like I have enough. I still don’t know that any of us have enough,” Hart said in an interview Monday with Gut Check. “I just wish there were some banner, some lighting rod that we could point to that has happened in the last 3½ years that showed how he changed things for the good.”

“I am just a regular person trying to make ends meet,” Hart continued. “I still very much appreciate the president but I really am worried though that I don’t see enough traction for the average person. I worry about the people. I worry about the ineffectiveness on the Democratic side and the meanness on the Republican side.”

There she does it again. Hart has a way of putting her finger on the weakness of the current political debate: connecting with the middle class, especially a middle class weathering a tough economy.

When asked how she is doing now, Velma Hart answered quickly, “Struggling to figure out what is going on. ... Everything is so uncertain.”

When asked whom she believes she speaks for, she said: “I am talking for everyone who cares like me; everyone who has kids like me; everyone who like me is thinking about retirement or wondering if we have to work until we die.”

But there is hope. Hart has no regrets about leaving the cloak of anonymous citizenry to brave the open microphone and klieg lights of the political spectrum, “I always tell my daughter if we really don’t stand for something, we’ll fall for anything.”

It’s my guess she’ll still vote for him.  Sigh. Come on, Velma.  Mitt can’t do worse and he just might do better.  What have you got to lose? Except a broken heart, failed promises, and a guy totally stuck on himself.

She’s not a slut, thank you, just a ninny and a fool

About Sandra Fluke, Peggy Noonan wrote:  “What a fabulously confident and ingenuous-seeming political narcissist Ms. Fluke is. She really does think—and her party apparently thinks—that in a spending crisis with trillions in debt and many in need, in a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose, in a time when parents struggle to buy the good sneakers for the kids so they're not embarrassed at school . . . that in that nation the great issue of the day, and the appropriate focus of our concern, is making other people pay for her birth-control pills. That's not a stand, it's a non sequitur. She is not, as Rush Limbaugh oafishly, bullyingly said, a slut. She is a ninny, a narcissist and a fool.”

Wall St. Journal,  September 8, 2012, on page A15 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: The Democrats' Soft Extremism.

Bush-Obama, Hoover-FDR

President Clinton likes to bask in the glory of the brisk economy of his years (like he did in the convention), when with a Republican Congress government spending was cut more than any other president's term in modern history.  There was a slight recession at the end of his term and beginning of Bush’s but not many remember since it was 9/11 that really sent the economy spinning.  In the final 2 years of Bush's term he was weakened by a Democratic Congress and tried bailouts and redistribution to turn around the economy (it's odd that Obama bad-mouths him so since he loves that too, but FDR did the same to Hoover). Hoover didn't cause the Great Depression--the Fed did that by inflating the value of money--and it isn't even part of the government. To goose the economy in 1932 Hoover not only increased government spending, but increased taxes by raising the marginal tax rate from 24% to 63%, and then FDR took it to 79% and then 83%, extending the Great Depression by many years. Bush and Obama had plenty of history to go on for their failed policies since 2007-2009 wasn’t our first rodeo, but they blew it.

I could give you pages, if not books, of citations, but you wouldn’t read them, so here are just two cites.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303753904577450910257188398.html

http://www.mtpioneer.com/March-deal-Hoover.html

These are the liberals . . .

Sorry, I can’t even quote them . . .

http://twitchy.com/2012/09/07/liberals-cuss-out-archbishop-timothy-cardinal-dolan/

And they probably vote.

What I did on my summer vacation

at Lakeside, Ohio, 2012

Ice cream social on Hotel Lakeside lawn

Week 1: June 25-29

2012 Elections Seminars on the 2012 elections, with a focus on the nomination process, presidential election, congressional/state elections and campaign finance
War of 1812 Presentations on the causes, major campaigns and outcomes of the War and a look at the War specifically in North Central Ohio

Download Week 1 brochure.

Week 2: July 2-6 (We missed some of this week, but were back on the 4th)

All Things Americana Seminars on topics related to American history and culture

Download Week 2 brochure.

Week 3: July 9-13

The Printed Word Seminars about the future of newspapers and libraries
The Sounds of Music Music-related seminars presented by several Hoover evening performers, including traditional, jazz and big band music

Download Week 3 brochure.

Week 4: July 16-20

The Great Lakes Seminars related to all five Great Lakes
Ethics in Society Seminars on state, national, international, and business ethics

Download Week 4 brochure.

Week 5: July 23-27 (we missed this one)

The Chautauqua Movement In conjunction with the National Chautauqua Network Meeting, gain further insight into the history of the Chautauqua Movement and the new Chautauqua Trail
The Olympic Spirit Presentations about the history of the Olympics, current happenings in London, and famous Olympians
9th Annual Vearl Smith Memorial Historic Preservation Workshop Historic preservation seminars presented by experts in the field (July 27)

Download Week 5 brochure.

Week 6: July 30-August 3

The World Today Issues of national/international importance selected in the spring based on current world events
Environmental Stewardship Seminars related to environmental issues and responsible use of natural resources

Download Week 6 brochure.

Week 7: August 6-10 (I skipped these)

Seeking Peace in a Multi-Faith World Speakers from Christian, Jewish & Muslim faiths present interfaith dialogue and “Peace with Justice” themes

Download Week 7 brochure.

Week 8: August 13-17

East Asia Experts on this geographic area address current political, business and cultural topics
Trends in Medicine Presentations about current happenings in the medical field

Download Week 8 brochure.

Week 9: August 20-24

9th Annual Civil War Week Seminars on numerous topics related to the Civil War

Download Week 9 brochure.

Week 10: August 27-31

26th Annual Senior Venture Week: Ohio Museums Representatives from Ohio museums explore museum concepts within the context of their unique collections

Download Week 10 brochure.

The Boyfriend

Ladies—you deserve better!

Women exposed to partner violence

There was an interesting study done in Cook County, IL about abused women (these days it's not even called "domestic violence," it's been down/up graded to "partner violence). I think the idea was that if identified as abused through screening by their doctors (aka primary health care setting), and then given the proper tools and resources, the women would do something to stop the abuse and improve their quality of life. Didn't happen. It's the second study that shows universal screening for partner violence does not prevent abuse. Sort of made me think of all the women who voted for Obama in 2008, have all the knowledge and resources to recover their dignity and pride in 2012, but will vote for him anyway. (JAMA, Aug. 15, 2012) The the answer is, more studies, more rigorous methods. I know a sample pool of several million women . . .

Not that I care much for Newt, but truth is truth

no matter where you find it.

Two womanizers, two excellent politicians, in the worst sense of the word. And both are Christians!

Yes, it certainly was an entertaining convention

Friday family photo—my Gators

My sister Carol’s grandchildren.

God and Jerusalem weren’t the only items deleted

Noonan on Good ol Joe

“As for Joe Biden, I love him and will hear nothing against him. He's like Democrats the way they used to be, and by that I do not mean idiotic, I mean normal—manipulative only to a normal degree, roughly aware of the facts of normal life, alert to and even respecting of such normal things as religious faith. I wish he did not insist on referring to his wife as "Dr. Jill Biden." I'm sure she has many doctorates, but so do half the unemployed in Manhattan.” WSJ 9/7/12

What Joe Pags got from the DNC and the RNC conventions

The Dems put on a good convention. President Obama gives a very inspiring SOUNDING speech. I'm confident 20,000 people in that arena will be voting Obama/Biden -- that's wasn't the job though. They lied, told half-truths, pandered, and made fun of the other side. What I took away from the RNC was, if you try, have drive, desire and ambition, YOU can realize the American Dream. What I got from the DNC was, you should get the spoils of someone else's work, strive to be in the Middle Class and trust that government knows better how you live than you do. The choice is very clear. Now, Romney/Ryan have to go on the offensive continuing the mantra that this current president has had four years to do what he said he would -- and the reality is, he's made things much worse. Pags

Northstar

We watched a horrible story on 10TV tonight about a horse that had deliberately been set on fire. He’s being treated at the OSU vet clinic and an anonymous donor is paying for his care and many people are making donations. The video was just awful. Did you know that fetuses are burned this way until dead so they can be aborted? Some are dismembered, removed piece by piece and struggle to live until they are stabbed in the brain. And you support abortion at anytime for any reason like our President?

Marriage is good for children and the economy

So why are Democrats discouraging both? The party platform is anti-traditional family, and anti-life.

What Obama inherited

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/06/us-usa-debt-downgrade-idUSTRE7746VF20110806

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU04000000?years_option=2005-2012&periods_option=specific_periods&periods=Annual+Data

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/09/04/u-s-debt-now-exceeds-16-trillion/

Barack and Michelle—middle class kids going to Ivy League schools on your dime

Everyone agrees--Michelle Obama gave a flawless presentation. I've only seen a few clips, but I'd judge her a better speaker than her husband, with a rich, authentic voice. That said, some of it sounded a bit "hard luck" for such a middle class girl.

I had a nice life growing up in a small, midwestern town. My father owned a small business--2 trucks, one employee and a gas station, as I recall. What we called middle class in the 1950s, they call poverty today. No TV, no AC, one phone, one car, no health insurance, clothes made at home, and a garden for fresh produce. One thing I do know is Michelle and Barack Obama's parents/grandparents were far wealthier than mine, and I didn't finish my degrees at the University of Illinois (about a fourth the cost of Harvard) owing any money. What I couldn't earn in summers or after school, my parents paid. I know these "I came up from nothing and struggled and look what I've accomplished" memes are great for politics, but they really belong with those "I built that" stories. And neither one of them did that.

• 
  Fellow blogger LadyBug Crossing says:
  

  We were middle class, too. Dad worked as an engineer for a large company. Mom was a nurse - she worked weekends. We traveled the world with him. We lived in the same house (except when we were overseas and they rented it out) my whole life....

  We made do. We shopped the sale racks. Mom made our dress clothes. We kids didn't get cars when we turned 16. I went to public school. I went to college and graduated without debt thanks to Mom's nursing job providing the extra. I worked every minute I was home from school. I lived at home until I got married. My graduate degree was earned while i was working. It wasn't easy, but I did it! We scrimped and saved for our house. Our cars are 10 and 11 years old. We have no debt except the mortgage. If we can't pay for it, we don't buy it. imagine that? Will I apologize for having a great childhood? No. Will I apologize because I have a nice life? No. Will I apologize for giving my children a similar life? No. They know the value of a dollar, the value of their education, and that family is where it's at. :-)

P.S.
I won't show you photos of Michelle's wedding gown because there are probably copyright issues, but you can google. Gorgeous and she looked fabulous. Definitely the 1% type dress and the men wore tuxes, whether or not she had to skip a few school loan payments to pay for it.

Why Obama will have to tax the middle class even more

In a recent study of the Tax Policy Center (Brookings-Urban Institute, a liberal think tank) the researchers "looked at how high income-tax rates would have to rise in the top two or even three tax brackets to lower debt to sustainable levels under something akin to CBO's estimate if we continue the way we are. They conclude that even if the top rates hit 100%, the budget "cannot achieve the debt-reduction targets in some or any of the target years." Though conceding that near-total confiscation is "completely unrealistic," they report the results anyway "to indicate the infeasibility of achieving a high debt-reduction target simply by increasing top individual income tax rates." And this is from economists who favor higher taxes."

And undoubtedly, there are anti-life, anti-God Democrats in Charlotte today (the ones who booed at putting God and Jerusalem back in the platform) who would say go for it--100% rates for the "rich." But when the rich are gone, they'll come for you. The intention is not to have better social programs—it has always been about control.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444914904577615392065706990.html

The Clinton Tax Hikes and cuts

“It was not until after a 1997 tax cut, passed by Congress—a tax cut President Clinton resisted but ultimately signed—that the spectacular growth kicked in. While small in static revenue impact, the 1997 cuts included a reduction of the capital gains rate from 28 percent to 20 percent. This opened the capital floodgates necessary for entrepreneurs to develop, harness, and bring to market the wonders of the new information technologies.” from Heritage http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/09/clinton-tax-hikes-slowed-growth

Down the memory hole with the Democrats

From Mike Huckabee’s email update, Sept. 5, 2012

“You have to give the Democrats props for successfully sending the housing crisis down the memory hole. From their campaign rhetoric, you’d think the so-called “failed policies of the past” were all Republican ideas like smaller government and lower taxes. No, the economic crisis had nothing to do with the housing bubble that began with a massive Democratic push to force banks to give home loans to people who couldn’t qualify for them. But with terrible timing for the Democrats, that inconvenient truth has burst out of the crypt and back into the news, just as they were convening in Charlotte.

Yesterday, the Daily Caller revealed some previously unpublished court information about a landmark case that many consider the fuse that set off the subprime mortgage boom and eventually, the economic meltdown. It was a 1995 discrimination lawsuit against Citibank, on behalf of a group of African-Americans who claimed they couldn’t get loans because of their race. It was part of a coordinated effort at the time by progressive groups. The banks didn’t want to be sued or accused of racism, so they loosened requirements for credit history and down payments. What the Daily Caller discovered is that among the original plaintiffs in that case, there was a startling loan failure rate. Out of about 186 homebuyers, roughly half have since gone bankrupt or received one or more foreclosure notices. As few as 19 still own homes with clean credit ratings. Even some of the plaintiffs now say the banks never should’ve made those loans.

And here’s the kicker: the lead attorney on that case that prompted banks to start making home loans to people who couldn’t qualify for them was a young Chicago community activist named Barack Obama.”