Canada? What a joke.
Later with Biden in power, transparency and independent media were a threat to his freedom strangling administration, and all alternate viewpoints had to be fired, deplatformed or tracked for being against "democracy."
Three years from now, some of you will look back & admit that you spent an entire year of your life wearing a mask, cooped up in your house & avoiding all the people you love. A year in your life that you’ll never get back.
Every single day is a risk.
Car accident, flu, etc.
Our days were numbered from the moment we took our first breath. Life isn’t a race where we win against the inevitable! That has not changed since the beginning of time!
BUT, we should not be forced to live in fear.
We went from being a free nation to being told we:
couldn’t go to school
couldn’t go to church
couldn’t go to our grandma's house
couldn’t pay respects to a loved one through a funeral
couldn’t leave our homes
...and when we were allowed to do these things, we were told:
how long we could be there
how far apart we have to be
which direction to walk
what to wear
what we can buy/not buy
where we could shop/not shop
whether we could sing/worship/take communion
what time we had to be home
Yes, our health matters.
But you know what else matters?
Family.
Friends.
Church.
School.
Sporting events.
Family vacations.
Neighborhood BBQs.
Life.
Fitness.
Hugs.
visiting the hospitalized
Etc.. etc...
One day, you’ll hug your grandma, mom, dad, or brother for the last time.
One day, your best friend will cry on your shoulder for the last time.
One day, your child will play their last ball game.
One day, they’ll have their last day of school.
One day, you’ll spend your last day laughing with a loved one.
One day, you’ll dance your last dance.
Don’t waste the days you have by living in fear.
Your time here on earth matters.
Live your life while you have the chance.
God is gonna call you home when it’s your time.
Virus or no virus.
https://globalcitizensunited.substack.com/p/life-is-risk?s=r
Cases of a new virus from Wuhan, China, were being reported all over the world, and the few in the U.S. involved foreign travel. These were cases, not fatalities.
On January 29, 2020 the President's Coronavirus Task Force it was established.
On January 30 the President closed tourism coming from China.
On February 26, 2020, U.S. vice president Mike Pence was named to chair the task force, and Deborah Birx was named the response coordinator.
Then a man died in a Washington state on February 29. President Trump had already closed travel from China at the end of January. Ohio by March 3 had yet not had ANY confirmed cases, let alone deaths, when Governor DeWine began cancelling events. At this time, DeBlasio, Pelosi and Cuoma were still inviting tourists to come to their states/cities.
On March 4, when many states had yet not had one case, the HHS announced the intent to purchase approximately 500 million N95 respirators and Secretary Azar announced that HHS was transferring $35 million to the CDC to help state and local jurisdictions that have been impacted most by the coronavirus.
On March 6 the President signed an $8.3 billion bill providing $7.76 billion to federal, state, and local agencies for combating the coronavirus, and authorizing an additional $500 million in waivers for Medicare telehealth restrictions.
On March 11, the WHO announced it was a global pandemic, and the President in a speech to the nation said, “We are cutting massive amounts of red tape to make antiviral therapies available in record time. These treatments will significantly reduce the impact and reach of the virus. . . and he also said:
“The vast majority of Americans: The risk is very, very low. Young and healthy people can expect to recover fully and quickly if they should get the virus. The highest risk is for elderly population with underlying health conditions. The elderly population must be very, very careful.” Today, December 21, that is still the case. Even with thousands of deaths, the fatality rate from this virus is about .3% with the elderly at higher risk, and young people suffering higher than usual deaths from non-Covid reasons.
On March 13, the president also declared an emergency for COVID-19 under Section 201 and 301 of the National Emergencies Act. The National Emergencies Act (NEA) generally authorizes the president nearly unlimited discretion to declare a national emergency. President Trump Declares State of Emergency for COVID-19 (ncsl.org)
On April 29, Operation Warp Speed announced—a public private partnership initiated by the U.S. government to facilitate and accelerate the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics.
My question for Democrats; if the President had extended the national lockdown to mandatory after the two weeks at Governors’ discretion, how would you or the national media have accepted the order from the president you’d been trying to impeach, whom you called a Nazi, whom you called illegitimate because he won the Electoral College and not the popular vote? Also which has been more effective in your opinion, Operation Warp Speed or the lockdowns?
I met Robin and Karen on our trip to Scotland in 2017 and we’ve stayed in touch via e-mail and Facebook. He’s a conservative, and an immigrant via Germany, Holland, and Canada. He lived in a Nazi camp as a young child. Although not originally a Trump supporter, he definitely knows he’s not a Nazi or racist, because he has lived that. Sometimes on e-mail I see things with no attribution and that distresses me (retired librarian). This piece hasn’t been published on-line because it’s a “private” letter that has been made public by the authors. Three doctors in practice in California. Robin sent me (Norma) the following:
-----------------------------------------
Full disclosure; co-author Dr Hopkins is a urologist.
I am his patient and he is an exceptional physician. This letter bears
serious consideration.
This letter was
published last night (Dec. 14) by 3 well known ER doctors from John Muir
Hospital in Walnut Creek, CA.
Dr Farnitano and
Contra Costa County supervisors,
We are writing
to you with deep concern regarding more lockdown measures for our county. We
feel the science is clear that more lockdowns lead to much more non covid
morbidity and mortality as supported by the CDC.
We are confused
as to why this is happening as we are often overcapacity in our hospitals and
ICUs every winter and we have never done this previously. We also run our ICUs
normally at a high rate of occupancy as this is most cost effective.
Here are the
issues in a nutshell:
1. Excessive PCR
testing is leading to numerous false positive results. The specificity of
PCR testing is really unknown but I have seen many authorities claim it is no
higher than the low 90% range because of the attempt to be 100% sensitive using
cycle threshold standards of 40. (sensitivity is inversely related to
specificity)
2. For the sake
of illustration, I will assume a 97-98% specificity which is likely far too
high. Back in March when the county could only perform 300-400 tests per day, a
98% specificity would only lead to 6-8 false positive tests. Now we have
reached up to 8000 tests per day. With a 98% specificity, that would lead to 160 false positive cases a
day in our county. With a population of 1.1 million that would put us at 14.5
positive cases per 100,000 population and we would find ourselves in the worst
possible tier based solely on false positive tests!!! This is absolutely
a fact of epidemiology/science.
3. Again we have
normal ICU and hospital winter surges that happen every winter and we never had
any county lockdowns. Our county figures on your website show essentially
a stable ICU occupancy from July 1st to today. In addition on your website, we
only have a minimal surge in hospitalized patients as compared to last year.
4. When you test
like this for everyone that comes into your hospital, 'hospital covid
patient" numbers will rise simply because you are capturing more
asymptomatic disease in patients who otherwise are visiting the hospital for
other reasons.
5. Public policy is being based on
these erroneous numbers and assumptions.
6. Public policy
with shutdowns (various closures) leads to excessive non covid related deaths.
Please see attached CDC article which shows clearly that these excessive deaths
are most pronounced in the 25-44 year old age range with numerous weeks during
this year that 40-50% excessive deaths are seen in this age group. When you
measure in terms of life-years lost as compared to life-years lost with actual
covid deaths, it is not even close. We are harming more people in our community
who do not have nor are at risk of having significant covid disease with
senseless closures of businesses and schools. This is data supported.
7. The CDC and
pediatric societies across America have voiced their support of opening all
schools. School age children are not significant vectors of the disease.
With this
information above, can you answer the following questions:
1. how do you
account for these high numbers of false positives with the county tiering
system? Do you throw these numbers out so that only true positives are counted?
2. Why did you
not intervene with any type of community closure in the past winters when our
hospitals were at overcapacity? What is different now?
3. What data do
you have that supports closures of businesses like gyms and outdoor dining
while keeping other businesses open like walmart? What data do you have that
supports that we stay indoors as opposed to outdoors? (all the science that we
have reviewed supports a predominantly 99% indoor vehicle of transmission).
4. Why have you
gone against the medical experts in not recommending the opening of our
schools?
5. What about
our county's ICU figures caused you to trigger a closure? As you can see on
Contra Costa County website, ICU occupancy has been stable between 75 and 80%
since July 1st despite changing covid admissions. Please be specific here. When
we run normally at 75% occupancy, why is 85% so terrible? We handle these
surges every winter. It is expected.
We look forward
to your reply.
Sincerely,
Pete Mazolewski,
MD, FACS, USAR
Brian Hopkins,
MD,
Mike
deBoisblanc, MD, FACS, USAR