Wednesday, October 19, 2005

1632 Seventeen plus weeks to see a doctor

Health care is improving in Canada--it now takes only 17.7 weeks for treatment after your first visit instead of 17.9 weeks. The drop is because Saskatchewan has improved to 25.5 weeks. At the coffee shop this morning Jim sounded just awful. Bronchitis he said. His wife is a doctor and she told him he needed to see a doctor, so he called today and has an appointment this afternoon. Just be glad you aren't Canadian, I said, and read him the stats from this morning's paper. I am, he said, because then I'd have to live in Canada.

I know Mr. Cloud will respond and tell us that it isn't really 17.7 weeks if you are really sick, that it is only for elective surgery like by-pass or transplants or wrinkles, prolly. The only "new" idea the Democrats have for 2008 is nationalized health care. Or, as I like to call it, FEMAized health care. Call us when you have a disaster.

1631 Straight but sensitive

is the definition of a "metrosexual." Now before I ever had a chance to even use the word (except in this blog entry), it has been replaced by "ubersexual," according to Nathan Bierma's Tribune column On Language. He sites a new book, "The future of men" by the folks who gave us metrosexual. Examples are George Clooney, Bill Clinton and Bono--obvious heterosexuals who can feel your pain. Sweet. Anything to sell a book.

1630 Golf course bandages

Some golf courses get better care than people. Can't imagine why people go out and chase little white balls when they could be enjoying the scenery. But. . . today I took some photos of the golf course near by. It is really lovely, except it is being repaired, or renovated, or resculptured, whatever people do to these places. I don't know what this is called, but it looks like a giant bandage, or a huge mattress fastened to the dirt.



It's hard not to get an earthmover or truck in the photo, but there is some lovely color.

1629 The painting of Mr. Cloud

Those of you who were with me (bloggity speaking) during the summer, know I took a portrait class. Because I didn't know the class would be offered, I had no photos with me. So I looked around and settled on a lovely photo of Anvilcloud with some chickadees on his head and shoulder. He is a retired Canadian school teacher who writes a wonderful blog, and enjoys life with Mrs. Cloud, who also blogs at Brown Betty Brew. The portrait was never finished. I just can't paint chickadees.

But I have fresh batteries in the digital camera, so I decided to go to the art room and photograph Mr. Cloud. It's a bit messy, I obviously can close the door on that room, but you'll get the drift.

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

1628 On Memos and Surveys

This week I received a memo (RE: DEFINING THE CHOICE A Strategy for Going Outside and Reaching New Ground) from James Carville of Democracy Corps (I'm not sure why I'm on the mailing list) that suggested the Democrats recruit the supporters of Ross Perot, who they believe got Bill Clinton elected. I thought they sounded sort of dispirited and discouraged. Didn't see much of a program or plan, but maybe recruiting disgruntled libertarians is a plan?

In Carville's memo I saw the word "change" and "choice" but I never found any program or fresh ideas, other than universal health care, more money for education (hardly fresh ideas), and all was apparently to be funded by canceling tax cuts for incomes over $200,000. And it is the tax cuts that restored our economy after it started plunging in 2000. I saw nothing about saving social security or helping the poor. The twisted and biased wording used to describe various administration's programs in their questions would make even me say I was against it or looking for alternatives.

Considering the clarity with which Rush Limbaugh outlined conservative beliefs and values in yesterday's WSJ, I think the Democrats are going to have to find something a bit more focused than just bashing Bush, which this document definitely did.

Also, then I went to their webpage and looked at some of their polls. I read the poll taken last October right before the election. For the life of me, I can't figure out why they were so shocked they lost. The evidence in their own poll seemed clear in hindsight, although some numbers were terribly close. I had a little problem reading the figures, which seemed to be in percentages, although number of respondents was recorded (and it varied from question to question). The question on "feelings" struck me as really odd. Although the actual intention to vote may have put Kerry a little ahead of Bush, the "warm fuzzies" were in Bush's favor (question 11). And the NRA and pro-life questions favored (more warm) the Republicans. So when they stepped into the voting booth, did feelings win out over intention?

When it came to issues, in general only Bush was rated--Kerry's name was not there in "direction the country is headed." But on specifics, (Q. 37-49) I think Bush rated higher than Kerry--and way outpaced him in security and terrorism. This could have made a significant difference in the voting booth if there was a perceived gap between the poll and the results.

Also, I think this one (Q. 4) was interesting because it was so out of place--like it was intended to create doubt; but no one took the bait:

Q.4 Many people weren't able to vote in the 2000 election for President between George Bush, Al Gore, and Ralph Nader. How about you? Were you able to vote, or for some reason were you unable to vote?
Total
Voted ...........................................91
Not registered in 2000/Ineligible/too young.......2
Did not vote .....................................6
Can't remember/Don't know/Refused) ...............0
(ref:VOTE00)

According to their poll, no one had a problem voting in 2000. So, how accurate is their premise, "many people weren't able to vote in the 2000 election."

http://www.democracycorps.com/reports/surveys/dcor103104fq20public.pdf

1627 Talk to the Democrats about high gasoline prices

Elvis was still alive the last time the United States built a new oil refinery (1976), according to the Wall Street Journal ("Agony and Energy," on-line for subscribers). That was probably the last time the Democrats had something creative to offer. The energy bill that recently passed in the House did not have a single Democratic vote. So if you want to complain about high gasoline and heating costs this fall, please contact your anti-energy Congressperson, who is apparently a Democrat. Gasoline for America's Security Act of 2005 was a squeaker October 7 in a vote of 212-210.

"Don't go home and tell your constituents you did anything for them. In truth, you haven't," said Rep. James P. McGovern (D-Mass.) "When they ask you, `What did you do to lower the prices of gas and home hearting oil,' you can say, honestly, you did nothing."

Here’s what the bill will do.

1) gives the government the authority to use closed military bases as possible refinery sites.
2) lets governors request the Department of Energy coordinate the permitting process.
3) reduces the number of “boutique” fuels from 17 to 6.
4) allows more time to cities to petition to meet costly ozone standards (2010)

The Democrats, playing their one string guitar, say it doesn’t address the cost of natural gas and it gives too many benefits to the profit-rich oil barons and special favors to business interests. Same old, same old.

1626 Turning blogging into dollars in a big way

Write a blog, scramble for funding, do a good job, fill a need, and let AOL.com buy you! It worked for Jason Calacanis, who writes an entertainment, magazine, media type blog. Check back in a few months to see if the honeymoon is over. He wrote on Oct. 10:

"It’s pretty exciting to be part of a transformation like this and I’m going to put all my energy into it. For me this is more exciting than doing another startup to be honest. Look at it this way, I’ve done three or four startups since I worked for SONY back in 1994/95. It’s been over 10 years since I’ve been part of a big company doing big things. At SONY I was 23 years old and was sitting in the basement—I couldn’t get anything done. I fought my way to the CEO at SONY and told him to buy Lycos and Yahoo and he didn’t do it even though the price would have been less then the Last Action Hero!!!

At AOL I don’t have to fight to get to the CEO and senior management team—I can send them an IM or go to lunch with them any time I want! In fact, I’m part of the executive team and they’ve embraced me and my team with open arms. I’ve known members of the executive team at AOL for over 10 years in some cases, so there’s a lot of history and trust between us."

I remember a few mergers and acquisitions that felt that way too. . .

1625 You'll never catch me running

Actually you could catch me, because I almost never run. I entered the Raccoon Race at Lakeside about twenty years ago, and walked the route after the first block.

Raccoon Run (3 miles), Lakeside, Ohio


The women's breast cancer marathon was this past Sunday--usually its cold and rainy, but I wouldn't watch even if it were sunny and pleasant. But at Jane Galt's site this morning (another non-runner) I saw a link to the 10 best reasons for not running marathons. All the reasons are documented by research on heart, lungs, brain, etc., and are not anecdotal, but it is easy to read. I haven't researched this site, or the articles, but the text appeals to a non-runner, certainly. Still, read knowing I have not vetted the author or information.

Unless a very large animal is chasing me, or I'm late for dinner, you'll never catch me running.

1624 The Nose Knows

People born after 1970 probably have a sense of smell influenced by air fresheners and scented candles. But my nose can track a memory of home or people at a slight whiff. Yours too, if you think about it. Here's my list. What's yours?

My mother.
Fresh baked apple sour cream pie, and cinnamon bread hot from the oven on a Saturday evening
Coty Face powder.

My dad.
Fuel oil and gasoline being pumped.
After-shave--I think it might be Mennen.

High school days.
Any Prince Matchebelli cologne
New text book when opened the first time.

World War II.
Anything that smells like the San Francisco/Oakland Bay area in smog and fog.
Desert air in a Ford with the windows down.

Trail rides in the country.
Any barn with some fresh horse manure and leather smell from the tack room
Inside of a truck used to transport horses--old clothes, food wrappers, etc.

Ogle County Illinois fair.
Cotton candy
root beer.

My oldest son.
Avon baby oil

Pine or fir trees.
Any Christmas before 1993 when we got an artificial tree
White Pines State Park

Summers at my mother's farm.
Fresh produce from the garden
Laundry from a clothes line

Manchester College, Indiana
Stinky drinking water with iron(?) deposits
Instant coffee made with hot tap water

My daughter.
Safari cologne
Doctor's office

My son.
Stale cigarettes
Large Dogs

My son-in-law.
Tommy cologne for men

Monday, October 17, 2005

Storm video

Here's a link to the storm surge in Gulfport, Mississippi noticed at St. Casserole, a pastor in hurricane ravaged Mississippi. I don't know who the guys are who film this stuff, but they must love living on the edge. Watching a sedan blow through the front door of your hotel must be a bit scary.

1623 19.6 million blogs

At coffee this morning Adrienne gave me an article from the Dispatch (via WaPo) that said there were 15 million blogs. "Oh probably not," said I. "A lot of them are dead, or only have a few entries, or are just advertising." But I just checked Technorati, and it is tracking 19.6 million. Still, an awful lot are just listing of products. For the life of me, I can't imagine who reads them. Also there aren't many people my age blogging.

"Technorati is now tracking 19.6 Million weblogs, and the total number of weblogs tracked continues to double about every 5 months. This trend has been consistent for at least the last 36 months. In other words, the blogosphere has doubled at least 5 times in the last 3 years. Another way of looking at it is that the blogosphere is now over 30 times as big as it was 3 years ago. . . "

No matter what you think of blogging, that is just an awful lot of people writing, editing, reading, thinking and pixelating. My blogs are backed up on paper. Adrienne asked me what would happen to them when I was gone, and I said my daughter would probably throw them out.

1622 If you want tenure and promotion, don't blog

Ok, don't believe me, but read the whole article of which this is a part.

"Gina J. Hiatt, who works as a “tenure coach” for academics, said that she advises caution when non-tenured professors want to blog. Even assuming someone doesn’t spend all day on his or her blog, there may be an impression that the blogger is doing so, she said.

Attitudes may well change, she said, but it’s important to remember who has influence in tenure decisions. “Perhaps in 10-15 years, people will be looked up to for the scholarly dialogue on their blogs. But when you think about who is going to be on a tenure committee, they are going to be older and may not understand or respect it,” she said.

As for anonymous blogging, Hiatt said junior professors who think they can be frank about their departments and stay secret are fooling themselves. “I don’t think there’s any such thing as anonymous blogging,” she said. “It’s not that difficult to think about who this is. If you do any amount of blogging at all, you are going to give yourself away.” "

I've mentioned this at LISNews.com, but there are still people who talk about their supervisors and co-workers, without a thought for tomorrow's raise or job security. Also applies to salespeople, automotive managers, and fast food workers. Ah, the pleasures of being retired.

1621 A walk in the park

Recently I've been walking in a park I hadn't used probably since my children played soccer in grade school. It has 3 fitness routes, and by stopping about every 1/4 mile and stretching, I think I can avoid the leg pain that always plagues me when I exercise. I've been so inspired by the beautiful fall photos so many bloggers are posting, I decided to take along my digital camera.

I have to re-read the instructions each time I use it (about once a year), and this time I couldn't figure out how to turn it on. The batteries were dead, of course. But after a few attempts, here we go. Our fall color hasn't peaked, and this park may not have the right mix of hard woods to get the brilliant reds. But at least today I got in 2.30 miles of walking.

I'm thinking these young mothers might be twins, or at least sisters


Nobody wanted to visit; too busy


Not quite there yet; maybe next week more color

1620 Where were the headlines?

The biggest story this fall is not Katrina or Rita, or even Harriet, but the peaceful outcome of the constitutional vote in Iraq. So where were the headlines? The biggest story in inches in the USAToday this morning was that Americans are losing the "Battle of the bulge." Yes, news that you need to start back on your diet when you've put on 5 lbs., got more space than the fact (presented very negatively) that the Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds all went to the polls and voted. What liberal media? They really wanted this to fail. If it bleeds, it leads; if it succeeds, no need.

Right in the middle of the election "success" story (presented negatively) on p. 7 was an outlined box listing American military deaths. The assumption would be at first glance these Americans died so the Iraqis could go to the polls. Nope. One died of wounds received in July, and 5 of the 7 died in accidents. What liberal media?

The main front page stories were 1) sports (always a good filler if you only have good news to report) and 2) a rumor that some critically ill patients may have been euthanized in New Orleans during the flooding and evacuation. Usually, the media supports euthanasia of the elderly, but in this case, if it reflects negatively on something FEMA didn't do, euthanasia is a bad thing.

Go back and read your 18th century US history. The Iraqis are doing better than we did when it comes to getting a constitution put together.

1619 Finally a better mouse trap

I gave up carrying a wallet or coin purse years ago. I like small purses with just enough room to slip in my check book, small calendar, small toiletries bag (comb, eyeglass cleaner, lipstick, etc.), business card holder, kleenex, a few pencils and a note pad. But the vinyl wallet inserts that I transferred from a wallet purse to my check book are in tatters. I think they must be 10 years old and each window is ripped. Each time I was in a sundries store I'd wonder why no one produced these. Surely I'm not the only consumer who has wallets still in good shape with ratty, torn inserts. And today I saw them--so I bought two--they are only .99 cents. The package came with a little ruler on the side so you bought the right size, and it will hold 12 cards or photos, unless you're like me and you stuff a few extras in. I went on-line to see how common they are and still didn't find any (after a 20 second thorough search) that were 3" x 5 3/4" and will fit a clutch or checkbook. If you need this, I got it at K-Mart in the purse section.

1618 Sits on natural waist

Thank God! The fashion Nazis have relented, and realized that only 15 year olds wearing size 2 jeans look good in hip-huggers with bare bellies, butt cracks and thong underwear. I'm seeing this "sits on natural waist" description in a number of catalogs and ads for slacks and jeans this fall. No matter what I weigh, I have a small waist. I saw an ad the other day for models for Abercrombie and Fidgett, the largest of which was a size 8, and 29" was listed as the waist size. I'm the heaviest I've ever been and haven't bought an 8 in two years, but have never had a 29" waist--well, maybe when pregnant, but that doesn't count. Low rise jeans and slacks make it impossible to tuck in a shirt or wear a normal length t-shirt or sweater because when you sit down, whoosh, everything scoots down to cover your thighs that have just expanded 2 inches by sitting. Maybe I can finally buy some new slacks.

And that's my public service announcement for today.

Oops Update: Measured. 28 7/8". Whew.

Sunday, October 16, 2005

1617 Why is this happening to me?

Rebekah asked God this question (Gen.25:22). So in modern Bible studies you are asked this too, "When did you last wonder something similar?" So I thought and thought, and realized, I hadn't asked this in a long, long time. I think it is age. You realize if you're not going to ask "why" about the blessings, you ought to shut up about the rest. Anyway, faced with a blank place in the notebook, I wrote:

Shoulda
Coulda
Woulda
at my age would be odd.

There's no
reason
now for me
to second guess my God.

1616 So how's that working for you?

is a favorite expression of Dr. Phil after a guest has just spilled her guts about how badly she messed up her life and that of 37 other people. I've been wondering that about FEMA. For all of you who want more federal interference in our health care system, have you been watching the response? Let's skip New Orleans. I don't care how good FEMA might have been, it couldn't have overcome the Blanco-Nagin disaster response team.

Let's look instead at Mississippi. From the census data I saw, there were more homes in the path of Katrina in Mississippi than in Louisiana. The media just couldn't get 10,000 black people in one place to make it an anti-Bush story, so they skipped all the others whose homes were blown away or flooded in non-flood zone areas. But they've got a horrible mess there too. And an economy built on off-shore gambling? Whew! Talk about an economy below sea level! Just go check out St. Casserole who is ministering to her people in that state.

Here's the story of how we got FEMA. It was Jimmy Carter's idea to consolidate multiple agencies into one, and Joe Lieberman's committee to then fold that humongous agency into an even larger federal agency, Homeland Security. From FEMA's webpage:

"President Carter's 1979 executive order merged many of the separate disaster-related responsibilities into a new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Among other agencies, FEMA absorbed: the Federal Insurance Administration, the National Fire Prevention and Control Administration, the National Weather Service Community Preparedness Program, the Federal Preparedness Agency of the General Services Administration and the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration activities from HUD. Civil defense responsibilities were also transferred to the new agency from the Defense Department's Defense Civil Preparedness Agency."

Keep in mind, those functions are still needed during disaster--insurance, fire control, preparedness, civil defense, etc., but after 1979, it just became more unwieldy, and after 2001, almost ground to a molassess-in-January pace.

"In March 2003, FEMA joined 22 other federal agencies, programs and offices in becoming the Department of Homeland Security. The new department, headed by Secretary Tom Ridge, brought a coordinated approach to national security from emergencies and disasters - both natural and man-made. Today, FEMA is one of four major branches of DHS. About 2,500 full-time employees in the Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate are supplemented by more than 5,000 stand-by disaster reservists."

So why do you want this with our health care? Or for that matter, our educational system and our pensions, but that's so ingrained we'll never get out of that hole. There's still hope for our health.

Saturday, October 15, 2005

1615 Schedule of Services

Looking for a Lutheran church? At my other blog, Church of the Acronym, I list the eleven worship services for Upper Arlington Lutheran Church (UALC). You'll be able to tell from the description that I am somewhat a traditionalist myself. But I have friends over 70 who really like that rock-n-roll service.

1614 The birth of an urban legend

and we are in the delivery room--The Washington Post online edition. Captain Ed at Captain's Quarters says even a blogger wouldn't leave up an inaccurate post like Dan Froomkin's, in which Bush's polling numbers among blacks is listed as 2%. Then buried at the bottom Froomkin does acknowledge at the end of his breathless excitement that only 807 people were polled, "This latest poll included 807 people nationwide, and only 89 blacks. As a result, there is a considerable margin or error -- and the findings should not be considered definitive until or unless they are validated by other polls."

Then, probably after Ed pointed it out in his #1 blog, Froomkin provides an update with the correct information, which shows no change at all among black voters, (because this falls within the margin of error, says Ed).

"[Late Update: The Pew Research Center is just out with its latest poll, which has a larger sample, and it finds Bush's approval rating among blacks at 12 percent, down only slightly from 14 in July. Here are those results .]" But in the meantime, others who read Froomkin's article before his correction are going with the 2% figure. Pull it Mr. Froomkin. Otherwise you look like a reporter for the MSM who makes up stories where there is none.