Verbs and nouns matter. So do biases. While the press wrote or implied, "Bush lied (about everything)," when it comes to Obama, it's a much more delicate wrap up of his campaign promise to close Guantanamo, the reason so many moderates voted for him (other than a pretty face and empty rhetoric). According to WaPo, on that promise he just made a pragmatic decision, a miscalculation, his plans were undermined, there was confusion, even timidity and passivity that reflects his "style." Oh crap. The man lied to get in office. About everything. He didn't even write his own autobiography which created the empty suit. The only things he has followed through on, some within days of taking office, are funding embryonic stem cell research, removing religious symbols in public events even if it's a church's building, redistributing wealth from the upper class to the middle class, and weakening our position in the Middle East. Although that last one he's apparently had second thoughts about with decisions to bomb Libya.
Shame, shame on the Washington Post writers Peter Finn and Anne E. Kornblut. Not that I expected anything different, but shame is the only word to describe WaPo's fall from being a watchdog to being a lapdog.
Guantanamo Bay: How the White House lost the fight to close it - The Washington Post
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It never ceases to surprise me to what an extent some people attack Fox News, but then never question the rest of the MSM, which is often just as biased as Fox News just in a different direction. The low point of this phenomenon was the 2008 elections when it may have affected the electio results.
objectivistpolitics.blogspot.com
Post a Comment