This story is from ABC, after the Petraeus testimony today. But half the electorate knew the White House was lying on September 12 just by knowing the date and the amount of ammunition used. Why couldn’t the media connect the dots and ask more questions? Because they didn’t want to hurt Obama’s election to another term.
"Former CIA Director David Petraeus told the House Intelligence Committee today that it's unclear why the Obama administration's original talking points on the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, don't match the CIA's original talking points.
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., told reporters that Petraeus insisted today that he was clear with Congress from the start that the event was a terrorist attack.
However, King added, Petraeus said that after the CIA prepared its talking points, they were vetted by agencies including the Justice Department and the State Department, but "no one knows yet exactly who came up with the final talking points."
"The original talking points prepared by the CIA were different than the final ones put out," King said. Originally, he said, they were "much more specific on al Qaeda involvement."
Posts
1 comment:
They media did the cover up for nothing, because there is no way to budge an Obama lover.
Post a Comment