What does the Buffett rule achieve?

Nothing.  Obama calls it “fairness.”  I call it a ploy for more votes for people who don’t understand economics—and a few who do, like nancy g and Lynne W, but will vote for him anyway. What will “fair share” do for you?  Nothing. You’ll never see it, hear it, touch it, taste it. I’m not rich, and I don’t envy anyone, not if they inherited, won it gambling, or worked hard for it.  It doesn’t belong to me.  Three Maryland people have won the Megamillions.  Is that fair to all the others who paid in to it?  Well, the others obviously must have known the risk and the chances. But they got nothing.  Some might call it unfair that they were lured into spending money at impossible odds.  The richest 400 pay 19% every year, their secretaries pay about 16%.  Warren Buffett’s secretary, according to an article in Forbes probably makes about $200,000+ a year.  Is that fair to other secretaries who don’t work for Buffett, but work just as hard?  Why does she/he get so much? Why does she earn more than librarians?

This is not about the deficit or about taxes, it is about a politician’s idea of “fair” and we know all that money goes into the bureaucracy and not back to the people.  It’s never been any different in any society.  The word “fair” is guaranteed to create jealousy—how many times did you hear your kids whining about “fairness.” Just try it in any classroom of first or second graders, which is about the level the Democrats are right now.  The rich pay most of our taxes.  Is that fair?

I was a librarian.  One of the lowest paid jobs you can have that requires an advanced degree.  Is it fair that lawyers or hospital board members like the Obama couple back in the 90s could have 6 or 7 times my income just because of who they were?

Americans can’t afford her lifestyle either

Am I surprised Michelle couldn’t make things work on Bo’s salary?  Not.

"In 2005, when Obama began serving in the U.S. Senate (and his daughters turned 4 and 7), he and his wife were earning a combined annual income of $479,062. Barack Obama was paid a salary of $162,100 by the U.S. taxpayers, and Michelle Obama was paid $316,962 to handle community affairs for the University of Chicago Medical Center."

What a shocker—Obamacare will cost much more than estimated!

Charles Blahous of Mercatus Center at George Washington University has some news about Obamacare that Republicans already knew and Democrats will deny, and the White House will find a way to blame on Republicans. Realistically, have you ever known a government program that didn't cost way more than estimated or confirmed, whether it be a war or a welfare program? Right now, the WH is hiring thousands of IRS agents which are part of Obamacare. How will that help your health? It's the Full Employment for Government Workers Act.

Let's cut to p. 45 of the report--the conclusion: ". . . despite the fondest hopes of its supporters, the passage of the ACA unambiguously darkens a dim fiscal picture. . . expected to increase federal spending obligations by more than $1.15 trillion. . ."

People—listen up.  This was never, ever ever about saving money on health, or providing better health care, or covering people who currently don’t have health insurance.  It was always about the government taking over a huge segment of the economy.  Period.

http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/publication/The-Fiscal-Consequences-of-the-Affordable-Care-Act_1.pdf

Cost of the IRS agents: Half a billion dollars, paid for off-the-books by taxpayers through a massive $1 billion Health and Human Services slush fund that got tucked into the bill. Investors.com

Obamedia

CNN and msnbc in a ratings battle seem to have their shorts in a knot over someone's racist FB page, and when and where to use the N word and the F word, but are they ignoring a lengthy audio of the new black panthers in Florida threatening a new "red sea" of blood and calling for the deaths of whites and especially Zimmerman, using all sorts of racist terms. You can get the audio on just about any website with Google, but haven't found it on the news.  And Van Jones, the former White House green jobs guy who left to start trouble elsewhere is also calling for race trouble.

Praise the Lord for new believers in Christ

According to a member of the Columbus Chinese Christian Church who is in my exercise class at our church, Upper Arlington Lutheran, they had 26 baptisms on Easter! They serve 1st and 2nd generation Columbus area Chinese Americans and Chinese students at OSU and have services in 3 languages, English, Mandarin and Cantonese.

Communist Mao killed about 70 million of his own people—no one really knows for sure how many—but the result of Communists forcing the people of China to standardize their language (everyone now speaks his dialect, Mandarin), the Gospel has been able to be shared much easier. He meant it for evil, but God has used that evil man to bring the Gospel to the Chinese.

This blogger says Cantonese is a dying language.

All Obama all the time

Even for the children’s egg roll at the White House—it’s not about the kids, or Easter—it’s about Obama.  This man’s narcissism knows no bounds.  Basketball players joined in with a clinic for the kids, and the balls all had Obama campaign images on them.

Look here if you dare.  It’s sickening.

Yearbooks and Annuals

I don't know what generates the ads on the right side of my screen on Facebook, but this morning noticed one for yearbooks. I have my four high school yearbooks, The Mounder, from Mt. Morris High School in Illinois, two Illios from the University of Illinois (I was married by the time I graduated and couldn't afford one for that year), one from Manchester College, The Aurora,  in Indiana, and three from Mt. Morris College, Life, 1929, 1931 and 1932, my uncle Clare's, my mother's and my father's. The college closed in 1932 and merged with Manchester. We also have my husband's yearbooks, The Arsenal Cannon from Arsenal Technical High School in Indianapolis, a school that was larger than the town of Mt. Morris, and Tech's memorial yearbook for the first 50 years. One of the best things about yearbooks is reading the crazy stuff people wrote in them!

Summer’s coming—do you know where your college student’s brain is?

“While there is not shortage of good, foundational texts to educate the student interested in America’s economic history, there is a shortage of interested students. This is where parents must play an active role in their children’s education. Sending them off to a four-year institution and assuming that upon graduation they will be economically literate flies in the face of reality. If parents abdicate all responsibility to liberal professors, there’s a good chance the graduate will come home spouting liberal claptrap and looking forward to his or her next Occupy Wall Street rally.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/apr/6/dangers-of-academias-indoctrination-mills/

Class warfare in a graph—the Buffett rule

The tiny, almost invisible smudge at the top is the Buffett reduction of the deficit. This nonsense us purely to create anger and hostility toward successful people and lie about how much they actually do pay in taxes.

Why does Obama pursue class warfare?

This past week from his words and walk-back it seemed that President Obama knew nothing about constitutional law or the history of the country; he also doesn’t know much about taxing and the rich.  His drum beat and direction seem to be class warfare.

“To vilify success and the rewards it garners is an assault not just on capitalism but on liberty itself. As Will and Ariel Durant observed in "The Lessons of History" (1968), "freedom and equality are sworn and everlasting enemies, and when one prevails the other dies . . . to check the growth of inequality, liberty must be sacrificed."

Nowhere is the political debate over income inequality more detached from reality than the call for the top 1% of American income earners to pay their "fair share." The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) data on the ratio of the share of income taxes paid by the richest taxpayers relative to their share of income show that the U.S. has the world's most progressive tax burden.

The top 10% of earners in the U.S. pay 35% more of the income tax burden than in Sweden and 22% more than in France. These figures—from the 2008 OECD publication "Growing Unequal?"—include all household taxes imposed on income at the federal, state and local level, including social insurance taxes.” Wall Street Journal, April 6, 2012, The real causes of income inequality.

On reading Luke during Lent

Last year during Lent I read the Gospel of John.  John is an amazing document—no meek and mild Jesus to be found. He’s so confident in his mission and dogmatic in his words with all the “I am” statements.  And Pilate!  What a piece of work—kept trying to pass the buck—and did he really want to know, “What is truth.”  Was he just like people today who question the kingship of Jesus?  But what grabbed me last year I’d never noticed before—only John mentions that the notice fastened to the cross which read JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS, was written in three languages Aramaic (for the Jews, God’s chosen people), Latin (for all the earthly powers for it was the language of the great and mighty Roman empire, the language of commerce and the military), and Greek (for all the educated people, for it was the language of literature and the arts, a linguistic passport to any city and profession that mattered). What perfect symbolism!

This year I read the Gospel of Luke.  This is really a two volume work, with Acts being the second volume.  Several thing pop out to me from Luke.  First, a section many probably passed right over to get to the story is 1:1-4 which explains how the information was passed down from eyewitnesses, investigated by Luke, then written down in an orderly fashion, so it could be passed on to me and you in Lent 2012.

Second, I noticed how many times the words CROWD or CROWDS or a paraphrase like PEOPLE CROWDING AROUND, A LARGE CROWD WAS GATHERING, or ALL THE PEOPLE are used by Luke to describe the huge number of people who were taught by or healed by or followed Jesus.  Luke  mentions that Jesus’ own family couldn’t get near him because of the crowds.  The word/phrase appears so often that I was left to wonder if there were any Jews, Romans or Greeks in that area, the cross roads of the civilized world, who hadn’t either met him, or talked to someone who had.  By the time you count women and children who witness the miracle of the bread and fish, there must have been at least 12,000 in that crowd alone.  Sometimes the crowds were warm and friendly, sometimes they were evil and nasty, like when they drove him out of town and tried to push him over a cliff.  Sometimes Jesus was very blunt: “This is a wicked generation,” he said the the crowd increasing in 11:29.

Educated, religious people don’t look good as Luke records the memories of the followers and crowds.  Pharisees, teachers of the law, experts in the law, synagogue rulers, elders, chief priests, authorities, rulers and even the 12 disciples and the 72 who were sent out who were with him everyday often appear clueless and hapless, some even evil and plotting to kill him.  To the experts he also didn’t have warm words: “You foolish people,” ”Woe to you (6 times in Ch. 11), “You hypocrites,” but he ate with them in their homes just like the other sinners.

Demons, demonic spirits and evil spirits are really big in Luke. Jesus created the world—I think he knew the difference between disease, mental illness and demon possession or demonic influences. The Greek word diamonia is used 60 times in the New Testament, and other forms of the word many more times, and demons or Satan are mentioned by every writer, but the concept, singular or plural just seemed really to jump out as I read Luke, particularly in Chapter 8.  If you care to investigate the language, there is a 42 p. document on demonology on the internet, plus many books.

But oh the women!  They followed, they listened, they were healed, they served Jesus food, they brought their children for him to bless, and there’s no record of them doubting.  Since women are big talkers, I think they held on to the stories until Luke interviewed them and recorded their memories.  The big reward for the most loyal women who had followed him first in life, stayed with him at the cross and and then went to the tomb, was they were the first to know about the resurrection, the first post-crucifixion group told to go and tell the called disciples, the cowering fumblers and deniers who thought all was lost.

Stevie Nicks is 63

Sigh. Looks good (just watched a video I won’t post from 1987), but says they have to do the lighting just right.  Doesn't want to look 20 something, just 40 something. Still has hot flashes, but no children to worry about. . . her. I know she's had a 4 decade career and is a multi-millionaire, but she always sounds off key to me.  Don't think she's made it to Lakeside yet. We get them on their way up and on their way down.

http://youtu.be/ri-euoXzpIA

Interview

Behind every powerful man. . . is a smart woman

                              

Some might call La Malinche a traitor, but if you were a slave, and slaves were destined for sacrifice to the gods when the winners changed in ritual wars, who would you side with?  Pretty it up as much as you want with cultural anthropological chit chat, but the woman may have been ahead of her time.  She is the mother of the mixed races of Mexico. And God only knows what the radical feminists do to this story.

“Before the Spanish conquest, the Aztec civilization controlled trade routes from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico and as far south as Guatemala.  Its rich and populous empire was helld together by marriage alliances and ritualized battles in which large numbers of enemy warriors were captured and sacrificed to honor and sustain the gods.  When Hernan Cortes sailed from Cuba to claim the Mexican mainland for Spain in 1519, he could not have anticipated the odds against him and his small force of 600 foot soldiers and 15 horsemen.

His ultimate success in subduing the Aztecs was in large part due to the help of a Nahua slave woman called La Malinche, who became his chief interpreter, advisor, and the mother of his firstborn child.  She advised Cortes on the weakness of Aztec alliances with other indigenous groups, their respect for ruthlessness, and their preference for capturing rather than killing their enemies in battle.  Cortes used his information to defeat an army that was better supplied and much larger than his own.  After God, he said, La Malinche was his most important ally.” 

Thomas B. Cole, MD, MPH, JAMA March 28, 2012 describing the cover of the journal named for La Malinche.

Trayvon Martin, what we know for sure

“What we know is that two families and a community are suffering and being ripped apart because of the incident. It is also a fact that race mongers and the anti-gun cabals will attempt to use this tragic situation as currency to further their disastrous agendas.”

Sharpton and Obama Prostituting Martin Shooting

"If Trayvon Martin was a victim of white racism (hard to conceive since the shooter is apparently Hispanic), his murder would be an anomaly, not a commonplace. It would be a bizarre exception to the way so many young black males are murdered today. If there must be a generalization in all this—a call "to turn the moment into a movement"—it would have to be a movement against blacks who kill other blacks. The absurdity of Messrs. Jackson and Sharpton is that they want to make a movement out of an anomaly. Black teenagers today are afraid of other black teenagers, not whites."
Shelby Steele, WSJ, April 4

CBS, Consistently Biased Source

I watched the “balanced” story on billionaires supporting super PACs on CBS last night.  95% of the content was based on an interview with appropriate snarky and straw man questions for Julian Robertson, father of hedge funds and founder of a Mitt Romney PAC.  He’s given $1.25 million to get Romney elected, the man he says is the best in the history of the presidency in terms of qualifications.  At the tail end, almost as an after thought, the reporter included a reference to an e-mail (we don’t see it) from Hollywood’s Jeffry Katzenberg who has contributed to Obama’s campaign $2 million and  justifies his donation as fighting the right wing.  He had no tough questions and no face to face on camera time—just a throw away paraphrase of an e-mail. Katzenberg said nothing about Obama’s qualifications and accomplishments, at least not for this report. Nor was he asked if he would seek special favors.

I’m not sure the reporter even mentions how mad Obama was at the Supreme Court over PACs, and then decided to get one for his own campaign.  Nor did he note what a big supporter of environmental issues Robertson is—usually a cause to make the MSM swoon.  The point of this interview was to cut down on Romney who is starting to look like the guy to go after.  Don’t believe me when I tell you that if you watch only broadcast news you only get news for Democrats slanted to make the GOP look bad?  Watch the video.

Prager University—the power of the visual

“Men and the Power of the Visual.” Well worth taking a few moments for a refresher of how gender differences used to be taught.   This is the way I learned it in college psych classes, and the way I heard it in parenting classes in the 70s.  What is being taught to young people today? Is it now capitalism's fault, and a problem of a paternalistic, male-dominated system?

Who or what motivates the first lady to show up at public celebrity events dressed like a 16 year old whose parents don't know she escaped the house in that skimpy outfit?  Should she become enraged if men notice her long legs and exposed crotch with a skirt that doesn’t cover her derriere?  Whose fault is that--the designer, hers,  her husband who gives her no attention, or the men taking a longer look?
http://www.prageruniversity.com/Life-Studies/Men-and-the-Power-of-the-Visual.html .

Prager University has some interesting offerings to counteract the socialist left theories taught today.

The Redeemer (movie) 1965

This morning I turned on EWTN about 5:30 a.m. and the movie “The Redeemer” was just starting.  It appeared to be the story of the last hours of Jesus beginning with Judas’ betrayal, and since this is Good Friday, I sat down to watch it.  Something seemed familiar, but also odd, then I realized the face of Jesus was never shown and the faces of the actors weren’t familiar. So I looked it up on Google and learned it was a Spanish film from 1959, directed by Joseph Breen and Fernando Palacios, dubbed for American audiences in 1965.  Macdonald Carey was Jesus’ voice and the narrator was Sebastian Cabot, which is probably why something seemed familiar to me. In the style and mood of the 1950s, the well-known, but always fresh story of the cross and resurrection moves more slowly and thoughtfully with pauses for thinking—much less whip lash than modern films.

Here is a blog entry from Bible Films Blog which provides some information, but also in the comment window there is additional information with links to two other films in the series,  "The Savior" ("El Salvador") and "The Master" ("El Amo" or "El Maestro"). Some parts have been recut for use in Sunday School. The links to those other films no longer work, and one website that promoted them said “no longer available.”  The Amazon link is called “The Life of Christ the Amazing Trilogy,” and are for used DVDs.

Dependency on the Government at an all time high, but read the small print

One of the problems with a lot of right wing/conservative web sites that cite the Heritage Foundation Special Report of Feb. 8, “The 2012 Index of Dependency” is they don’t note that for purposes of reporting, Social Security and Medicare are included as government assistance programs—as in, my husband and I are lumped in with 67.3 million Americans who depend on the federal government for housing, food, income, student aid and other assistance.  “These programs [SS, Medicare, Medicaid] currently make up 42 percent of all non-interest federal program spending. . . Jointly, these programs will enable the government dependence of nearly 80 million baby boomers.”

Those of us who have paid into Social Security and had Medicare payments deducted from every paycheck don’t like being included in that. We just sent in our 2011 tax returns, and 85% of my husband’s SS check is taxed, as is my STRS pension. So we’re not exactly free loaders when it comes to paying taxes.

Index [of Dependence] measurements begin in 1962; since then, the Index score has grown by more than 15 times its original amount. This means that, keeping inflation neutral in the calculations, more than 15 times the resources were committed to paying for people who depend on government in 2010 than in 1962. In 2010 alone, the Index of Dependence on Government grew by 8.1 percent.

Bloggity bits about health

In Nauru, an island in the Pacific, the prevalence of diabetes has reached more than 40%, one of the highest in the world.  Nauru is the fattest country in the world, with over 95% of the population obese.  I can’t find any record of a McDonald’s or Wendy’s on the island, however.  (NEJM, Dec. 22, 2011)

-----------------------------

The “best buy” health interventions for non-communicable diseases according to NEJM, Dec. 22, 2011, is 1) tobacco, 2) alcohol, 3) bad diet—high sodium, high fat, and 4) lack of exercise.  The most bang for the buck and we not the professionals are the ones who make the difference.

-----------------------------

Overdoses from prescription opioids (painkillers) result in 40+ deaths a day, and 1.2 million emergency department visits a year, a 98.4% increase since 2004.  Isn’t that around the time drugs were added to many health insurance policies?  JAMA, Jan 4, 2012

---------------------------

Brain food—eat fish that is baked or broiled at least once a week to protect your brain. It’s easier to protect your brain than repair it.

---------------------------

I was reading about Charles Burchfield’s The Sun Through the Trees on the cover of April 4 JAMA and discovered he was a Lutheran.

In the early 1940s, partly prompted by his conversion to Lutheranism, his wife's faith, Burchfield returned to the natural landscape with renewed conviction. He reworked his early watercolors, often incorporating them into larger compositions by painting on strips of paper added to the edges. These monumental, visionary paintings evince a quasi-religious embrace of nature.  Link

-----------------------------

26.7 million adults aged 50 years or older have a clinically significant hearing loss, but fewer than 15% use hearing aids.  And now age-related hearing loss has been found to be independently associated with poor cognitive functioning and dementia.   Needs more research to find out why.  JAMA March 21

----------------------------

When I was young, births at home were becoming increasingly rare. A friend of mine was named after the doctor who delivered him at home in our little town (also delivered me but in a hospital). Now there is an uptick among white women having home deliveries.  An increase of 36% among whites, and a decrease among blacks and Hispanics and other minorities. JAMA April 4.

------------------------------------

And finally, not in any magazine, but a miracle of sorts on my husband’s face.  About three weeks ago he had a tiny spot of malignancy removed from his face.  Probably from sunburns as a child.  Although it was tiny, it required a huge incision, and he looked like he’d been the loser in a sword fight.  Today, I can hardly see it. Our daughter, who works for a doctor, gave us his name after advising us not to let the dermatologist do it. She’d seen his work on their patients.  What excellent advice. She also can download photos to my computer without losing them, and glue our microwave back together.

Obama is giving community organizers a bad name

Is he lying, deceptive or ignorant? Commentary says he has jumped the shark (a term coined to apply to TV when the program had outlived its freshness and viewers had begun to feel that the show's writers were out of new ideas.)

“Set aside the fact that the House, despite a huge Democratic majority, passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by a margin of 219-212, hardly a “strong majority.” In fact, it barely qualifies as a plurality. Let’s turn instead to the substance of what the president said.

Obama, a former community organizer who is perhaps unaware of the finer points of the law, might want to acquaint himself with an obscure 19th century case, Marbury v. Madison, which established the doctrine of judicial review and grants federal courts the power to void acts of Congress that are in conflict with the Constitution. What Obama describes as “unprecedented” has, in fact, been done countless times since 1803.

Then there’s Obama’s confusion about judicial activism. It is not, as he insists, simply the act of overturning an existing law; it is when judges allow their personal views about public policy, and not the Constitution, to guide their decisions and often invent new rights out of thin air. For Justices to invalidate a law they deem to be unconstitutional is precisely what the Supreme Court is supposed to do. (“No legislative act … contrary to the Constitution, can be valid,” is how Alexander Hamilton put it in Federalist #78.) If one takes Obama’s words literally, he believes an unjust and unconstitutional law, if passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress, cannot be overturned.”