On reading Luke during Lent

Last year during Lent I read the Gospel of John.  John is an amazing document—no meek and mild Jesus to be found. He’s so confident in his mission and dogmatic in his words with all the “I am” statements.  And Pilate!  What a piece of work—kept trying to pass the buck—and did he really want to know, “What is truth.”  Was he just like people today who question the kingship of Jesus?  But what grabbed me last year I’d never noticed before—only John mentions that the notice fastened to the cross which read JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS, was written in three languages Aramaic (for the Jews, God’s chosen people), Latin (for all the earthly powers for it was the language of the great and mighty Roman empire, the language of commerce and the military), and Greek (for all the educated people, for it was the language of literature and the arts, a linguistic passport to any city and profession that mattered). What perfect symbolism!

This year I read the Gospel of Luke.  This is really a two volume work, with Acts being the second volume.  Several thing pop out to me from Luke.  First, a section many probably passed right over to get to the story is 1:1-4 which explains how the information was passed down from eyewitnesses, investigated by Luke, then written down in an orderly fashion, so it could be passed on to me and you in Lent 2012.

Second, I noticed how many times the words CROWD or CROWDS or a paraphrase like PEOPLE CROWDING AROUND, A LARGE CROWD WAS GATHERING, or ALL THE PEOPLE are used by Luke to describe the huge number of people who were taught by or healed by or followed Jesus.  Luke  mentions that Jesus’ own family couldn’t get near him because of the crowds.  The word/phrase appears so often that I was left to wonder if there were any Jews, Romans or Greeks in that area, the cross roads of the civilized world, who hadn’t either met him, or talked to someone who had.  By the time you count women and children who witness the miracle of the bread and fish, there must have been at least 12,000 in that crowd alone.  Sometimes the crowds were warm and friendly, sometimes they were evil and nasty, like when they drove him out of town and tried to push him over a cliff.  Sometimes Jesus was very blunt: “This is a wicked generation,” he said the the crowd increasing in 11:29.

Educated, religious people don’t look good as Luke records the memories of the followers and crowds.  Pharisees, teachers of the law, experts in the law, synagogue rulers, elders, chief priests, authorities, rulers and even the 12 disciples and the 72 who were sent out who were with him everyday often appear clueless and hapless, some even evil and plotting to kill him.  To the experts he also didn’t have warm words: “You foolish people,” ”Woe to you (6 times in Ch. 11), “You hypocrites,” but he ate with them in their homes just like the other sinners.

Demons, demonic spirits and evil spirits are really big in Luke. Jesus created the world—I think he knew the difference between disease, mental illness and demon possession or demonic influences. The Greek word diamonia is used 60 times in the New Testament, and other forms of the word many more times, and demons or Satan are mentioned by every writer, but the concept, singular or plural just seemed really to jump out as I read Luke, particularly in Chapter 8.  If you care to investigate the language, there is a 42 p. document on demonology on the internet, plus many books.

But oh the women!  They followed, they listened, they were healed, they served Jesus food, they brought their children for him to bless, and there’s no record of them doubting.  Since women are big talkers, I think they held on to the stories until Luke interviewed them and recorded their memories.  The big reward for the most loyal women who had followed him first in life, stayed with him at the cross and and then went to the tomb, was they were the first to know about the resurrection, the first post-crucifixion group told to go and tell the called disciples, the cowering fumblers and deniers who thought all was lost.