Career Criminal, Hillary Clinton

Why is Hillary Clinton hated? Why is she so unpopular even with her own party?  For the first female president, is this the best woman in the country?  She's been involved in so many scandals and investigations, but others go to prison and she doesn't.  Since we have so many laws and regulations, a Clinton investigation could send anyone to prison for taxes, or some minor infraction.  And they do. Then real criminals are pardoned.  Now that we've seen how Comey investigated her most serious crimes to date, I guess it's easier to understand.  From Travelgate to Wikileaks about her manipulating of the 2016 campaign, she is a congenital and pathological liar. If she's elected this year, I'm pretty sure it will be business as usual.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypl1MYuKDY#t=212

The leftist news cycle--Trump all the time

The media are giving us 24/7 anti-Trump stories--that's so you'll see/hear if you only watch or hear it a few minutes, or several hours. But remember Romney? Probably the most ethical, moral man ever nominated? They actually told over and over a story about his dog in a carrier! One ad played again and again in Ohio was about a man whose wife had died years after one of them lost a job in a company that had Romney investments. One bi-racial newscaster even criticized his family for their bi-racial adopted grand child! And since he was a Mormon, oh, the stories of his grandfather moving to Mexico.  Sort of another "birther" smear.

No, the media are over the cliff left and if you think it's just Trump you weren't watching in 2012. In 2008 they did their best to smear war hero John McCain, and then switched to his running mate Sarah Palin to hate on as an easier target since she had no coat tails of husband or father in Washington. Horror of horrors--she had allowed her special needs child to live, unthinkable for the Marxist Feminists of the Democrat base (Hillary calls them the Red Army, btw). If you are voting Democrat in 2016, you had no choice in your candidate--Hillary worked with the media to get Sanders out of the picture.  And although Trump beat a very large field, the media also controlled that since it was well known even among her campaign staff (revealed in Wikileaks) Hillary couldn't beat any of the outstanding, younger Republicans who threw their hats in the ring.

"But what’s a Republican to do? Last cycle, we nominated the ultimate Boy Scout: Mitt Romney. Whatever you think of Romney from a policy perspective, he is as admirable a man as you will ever meet. To find a presidential candidate of better moral character, you probably have to go back to Abraham Lincoln and George Washington. Romney never said a rude word about a woman in his life. . .The Washington Post made a front page story of the fact that 50 years earlier, when he was in high school, he and others had cut a classmate’s hair. "

 http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/10/the-liberal-medias-perpetual-smear-campaign.php?

What to do about the Red Army

"Mrs. Clinton has been exposed to have no core, to be someone who constantly changes her position to maximize political gain. Leaked speeches prove that she has two positions (public and private) on banks; two positions on the wealthy; two positions on borders; two positions on energy. Her team had endless discussions about what positions she should adopt to appease “the Red Army”—i.e. “the base of the Democratic Party.” "

How the press buries Hillary Clinton's sins by Kimberley A. Strassel 

"If average voters turned on the TV for five minutes this week, chances are they know that Donald Trump made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.

But even if average voters had the TV on 24/7, they still probably haven’t heard the news about Hillary Clinton: That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of."

Here in Columbus, we can't get away from her lies even on our local news which is usually pretty good. Now they've been corrupted also.   It's still 5x the publicity on Trump's mouth as on her evil deeds.  But that's how the media made him the winner in the primaries, by giving his opponents only seconds while focusing almost exclusively on him. 

Michelle Obama's speech on language

Glenn Beck wondered in today's newsletter if Michelle Obama had given the best speech of the campaign. Well, no, although I've always thought she was a better speaker than her husband. She's also just as much the hypocrite. The Obamas cavort with Mr. and Mrs. Shawn Carter (Beyonce and Jay-Z), the billionaire trash talking rappers whose music and costumes demean women's bodies and especially their lady parts, but black women in particular. Michelle Obama is also a better actress than her husband--her voice quivered when she claimed to have never heard such awful language as on the Trump tape, another entertainer bragging about conquests, but the wrong ethnicity. I guess she wears ear plugs to those concerts.

But I did hear and excellent speech by another black woman being interviewed on the radio while driving to the grocery store.  She's not a billionaire or millionaire  like the Carters and Obamas.  She is one of Trump's surrogates talking about how she's waited eight years after voting for Obama for the Democrats to help blacks grab a hold of the American dream. Instead she's watching the perks go to new immigrants and refugees instead of Americans. She likened today's black leaders in Congress and Mayors' offices who are at the beck and call of the Democrats to the slaves who kept the other slaves in line on the plantation. She was so passionate and convincing I think she should be speaking instead of him. At least she talked about jobs, education and immigration.

 http://ndctrump.com/who-we-are/

Beyonce and Barack

“Beyoncé could not be a better role model for my girls because she carries herself with such class and poise and has so much talent,” Barack Obama said. (Reported in Huffington Post, Sept. 19, 2012) This is definitely a new definition of class and poise.

 

Jay-Z's lyrics.  Michelle took her daughters to his concert, but claims Trump's tape of 11 years ago is more disgusting than his lyrics. The Obamas have invited the first couple of smutty lyrics and undress to their home. Their net worth is about one billion.

A battle of the platforms

Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have mocked handicapped children (Obama on one of the night time comedy shows and she as FLOTUS of Arkansas).  We all remember that Sarah Palin's pro-life decision not to abort her special needs child was considered fair game by Democrats in 2008.  Newer more sensitive testing for abnormalities early in development in babies is used to destroy them.  Democrats want us to pay for the killing of those who slip through with laundered Planned Parenthood money which supports their election campaigns.

Sex stories and dirty talk matter only during elections, but they primarily destroy Republicans who in the subconscious mind of the electorate are the more moral of the two parties. During non-election years they are just considered puritanical prudes.  When Democrat Barney Frank's boyfriend was caught running a brothel for male prostitutes out of Frank's apartment, it didn't sink his career even 27 years ago.  The major media just chided him or glossed over the story about one of the most powerful men in Washington. The gay lobby was powerful even then, although a bit more underground. A KKK membership and record would sink a Republican, but not the Democrats who brought that baggage to Congress, serving for years and having monuments and hi-ways named for them.

Clinton can laud open borders, refugee resettlement without vetting, and born-alive abortions, and it won't raise hackles like a good sex tape. She can propose a 65% tax rate on estates which will impact small businesses and farms and not cause a blink because the greedly electorate uses the short form and will always think, "It's not my taxes." Destroying Title VII and Title IX both of which benefit women is being done on a regular basis by Obama's LGBTQ mafia and she'll continue down that path.

Hillary's awful potty mouth has been recorded in numerous biographies based on interviews from people who worked with her day in and day out, but if it's not in leaked e-mails, or caught on hot mic, then it doesn't exist.

What's on the news? Sex.

TV is running behind me in my office. Nothing about what Hillary is doing to destroy the country. Can't stand any more "news" about Trump ravishing women without their consent, so I click through a few channels--soap operas using some very explicit language that wasn't allowed the last time I saw one, Paternity Court, also sexually explicit euphemisms, probably if I kept it on I could find Jerry Springer, former Democratic mayor of Cincinnati, or Divorce Court, or Judge Judy, or Judge Mathis, all reporting sleeping around, or having sex with his girl friend's mother, or a guy with 8 baby mamas and behind in his support. I don't know if these are the deplorables or the Democrats. Guess I'll listen to the archived radio I enjoy.

 

   

 

 

Lebron James says guys don't talk like that [Trump] in locker rooms. I think he's a fabulous athlete, a great philanthropist, and did (finally) marry the mother of his children. But what's the image of him on the cover of Vogue? And what about all those athletes bragging about their baby mamas? Do they just speak quietly and respectfully of them behind their backs in the locker room?

 

 http://www.therichest.com/rich-list/most-shocking/top-10-professional-athletes-with-the-most-kids-and-baby-mamas/  

It's odd that the party that tells us biological sex doesn't matter, concern for our privacy in bathrooms is a transphobic insult, and pronouns must be changed in churches that host outside events, all of a sudden are having the vapors over sexual banter and talking dirty--but only from men, not loopy women in bars or on Facebook. Sounding strangely phony and political.

Recovery from the death of a beloved pet

I packed up all Lotsa Spotsa's kitty things (our calico who died Monday) with her cat food and litter in a big shopping bag and looked up the address of Cat Welfare where we found her in 1999 to donate them. Stopped to browse the adoptable cats--female, adult, small, colorful, friendly. Big mistake. Maybe I'd better wait awhile.

But I did have to laugh at this story on the website about a successful placement:

"We lost George, our 17-year-old cat, at the end of June 2015. He was such a good friend and companion that we knew we could not replace him for a long, long time. And when we did, we knew we'd replace him with another calm, older cat. We waited eight days. Then we adopted these three goofy kittens. They were tiny when we got them, however, they have grown into their current collective nickname, "The Fatties." They shed too much and stink fairly often and destroy most everything but they are big, happy healthy girls -- sisters -- who we love to pieces and we couldn't imagine life without them. George would be appalled but, on some level, would probably grudgingly approve."

 

Cancer relapse in a child, a mom's account

I've been following Lily's story for years.  Her grandmother Carol is a blogger friend--her whole family, the Shaws, blog.  Recently, Lily relapsed after over 5 years in remission (she's 15 and  active in sports and doing teenager things, with tickets and hoping to see Adele). This is very rare after 5 years in remission. This was written by her mother, who posts on Facebook. 

Well, not to sound like a 13 year old but today has SUCKED!!! It started out fine. Lily and I walked some and she did homework. Then she and I tossed the volleyball around which was fun. 

Then she got her chemo. PEG - L- Asparaginase. Earlier this morning the doctor had gone through all the possible side effects especially the risk for anaphylaxis (that is where you have an severe allergic reaction to the point the airways swell making it where you can't breathe). We weren't expecting any reactions since she had a couple PEG doses last time she was in treatment and one two weeks ago. However he warned sometimes they see reactions after a lot of doses.

They started the chemo around 12:30 and within 20 mins I noticed a rash and she was coughing a little. Then literally in a matter of minutes it was a true medical emergency. Doctors and nurses literally came out of the woodwork it seemed. It was extremely scary. She was gasping for breath and couldn't feel her legs and arms. She couldn't talk. They were finally able to get her breathing clearly again after high dose IV Benadryl, Epi and hydrocortisone through her port. She is already on high dose steroids as a chemo so that also helps. She has rested and not felt great the remainder of the day. Not only is the medicine making her feel bad but it was also terrifying. This evening she started having a rash and some heaviness in her chest again so they are continuing with the Benadryl and watching her really closely.

So she won't be able to take that chemo. There is another chemo they will give in its place. The downside is instead of one dose it requires 6 doses. They don't feel she got much of today's dose so they will repeat the entire dose of the other chemo. In order to make up for this dose she will have the other chemo now Friday, next Mon, Wed and Fri and the next Monday and Wednesday. PEG is a regular part of treatment so we will have to do two weeks of three times of week for every dose of PEG she should have gotten from here on out. Complicated however worth it not to have a similar incident.

So they have said we are definitely here until next Monday and then they will reevaluate possibly letting her leave as long as she doesn't have any additional reactions and her blood counts start to recover.

Also, today we found out definitely that she won't be able to go to the Adele concert. Phillip had bought tickets for my birthday back in December for the girls and I--so sweet. We have known since we found out Lily relapsed it would be extremely difficult for her to be able to go, however we were holding out hope that her counts would start to recover and we could maybe get an exception with a mask (we have suite tickets). However, today Dr. Friedman said she didn't think there was anyway we could pull it off. I think we all knew that would be what happened however I had prayed her counts would recover so we could pull it off. We have looked forward to it so much. So I think Phillip is going to take Sophie and maybe a friend and Lily and I are going to listen to Adele's album in her room. However, it was yet another blow of something she would miss out on due to this.

So that is about it. Oh, steroids have kicked in big time in addition to the meds today, so its a hungry, sad, angry time (cancer moms know what I mean). Needless to say Cancer SUCKS!!!!!!

Keep an eye on your investments.

 Small groups of anti-first amendment activists are doing the same thing they did to our churches. Chip, chip chip until the foundation is completely undermined. This concerns Procter and Gamble, but they'll be back.

"However, spurned by activist investors, a dishonest press and liberal executives, the anti-religious movement is growing in America and threatening the liberty of millions. Muslim, Jewish, Christian and other religious investors... and citizens should take notice. Many major American corporations are working with liberal activists to severely limit your ability to freely practice your religion. This is a well-funded, well-organized effort with many high-profile corporations such as Apple, Disney, Salesforce and the National Football League leading the charge. Today, we stopped Northstar Investment Management's attempt to have Procter & Gamble join in on this fervor, but much more work remains to be done."

"Northstar's proposal also attacked freedom of conscience and public accommodation laws. There is a growing pattern in which, after a conservative legislature or governor works to expand religious liberty protections, liberal activists team with major American companies to try to stifle these efforts," said Danhof. "Procter & Gamble's investors should be proud that they defeated Northstar's efforts to make the company another pawn of the left." Press release, National Center for Public Policy Research

Reading the small print of the party platforms--Rogue Agency

About that rogue agency Obama created which advances big banks (supporting Hillary): it should be abolished regardless of which party takes the White House. . .  p. 3 Republican Platform

"Community  banks  are  essential  to  ensuring small  businesses  have  easy  and  affordable  access to the capital they need to grow and prosper. Community banks should be relieved of excessive
regulations. We support removing roadblocks and regulations that prevent access to capital.

The  worst  of  Dodd-Frank  is  the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, deliberately designed to be a rogue agency. It answers to neither Congress nor the executive, has its own guaranteed funding
outside  the  appropriations  process,  and  uses  its  slush fund to steer settlements to politically favored groups.

Its Director has dictatorial powers unique in the American  Republic.  Its  regulatory  harassment  of local and regional banks, the source of most home mortgages  and  small  business  loans,  advantages big banks and makes it harder for Americans to buy a home. Its one-size-fits-all approach to every issue threatens the diversity of the country’s financial system and would leave us with just a few enormous institutions, as in many European countries.

If the Bureau is not abolished, it should be subjected to congressional appropriation. In that way, consumer protection in the financial markets can be advanced through measures that are both effective and  constitutional.  Any  settlements  arising  from  statutory violations by financial institutions must be used  to  make  whole  the  harmed  consumers,  with any remaining proceeds given to the general Treasury.  Diversion  of  settlement  funds  to  politically connected parties should be a criminal offense."

Why are you voting for Democrats?

If you're tired of crime, poverty, bad schools, corruption and lies
then stop voting for Democrats

 http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/25-facts-about-the-fall-of-detroit-that-will-leave-you-shaking-your-head

 http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2016/03/cleveland_metro_ranks_in_top_1_1.html

 http://www.latimes.com/local/crime/la-me-lapd-central-20150902-story.html

 http://seattle.curbed.com/2016/2/1/10887154/university-district-has-seattles-highest-poverty-rate

Conservatives have a problem--moral relativism of liberals

"The problem for Conservatives is that they believe in morality and in recent days many conservatives found themselves in a gut-wrenching decision over whether to vote for or against Donald Trump. Individuals within the loop of moral relativism have no such problem. There may be one such person, but I have discovered no agony within the Hillary supporters.

• Fifty million abortions? No problem!
• 500 million dollars from the Federal Government to fund the new Nazis who run Planned Parenthood and sell off body parts? No problem! 
• Benghazi? No problem!
• Releasing of terrorists from Gitmo? No problem! 
• Emptying the jails of individuals who produced and sold cocaine and heroin? No problem! 
• Hundreds of millions in cash delivered to Iran in the middle of the night for ransom? No problem!
• Redefinition of marriage? No problem!
  
• Transsexual bathroom directives from Obama? No problem!
  
• No settlement of IRS harassment of Conservative groups? No problem!
  
• Continued chaos and suicides of veterans in the VA? No problem!
  
• Destruction of emails and servers by the Secretary of State? No problem!
  

When moral relativists in the Democratic Party demand that you do not vote for Trump, you have every right to make the same demand to the moral relativists to not vote for Clinton. If they, who do not believe in a moral universe, suddenly decide that there is such a thing; then, by all means use this fleeting opportunity to extract a pledge from them to not vote for Clinton."  Roland Lane​

My first piano teacher

Hacked e-mails. Have you ever gotten an e-mail from someone with no subject, and just a link? I don't know where that link goes, but I don't click. I've had two this week. Today it was from Helena Patlak. Now, I do know a woman by that name and she died in 2012. When I was 8 and she was 16 and we lived in Forreston, IL she was my piano teacher (Helena Tinklenberg, daughter of the Reformed pastor and organist at his church). Some years ago through the magic of the internet I located her and said "Hi, how are you," and she probably responded, "Who are you?" and so I ended up in her address box, and six years later that is hacked. How does this work--who profits? Yesterday, I got a no subject line message from Win and Gracia with a link, missionaries from Alaska whose newsletters I used to get years ago.  I didn't click.

What gets a rich Democrat excited? Killing babies

Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, recently stated that she gets excited hearing about how and why women choose to get an abortion: 

 

"For too many years, certainly for my generation, all issues about sex and sexuality were stigmatized. Abortion was, homosexuality was. And the exciting thing to me now is that young people are telling their stories and they are living out loud. More women are telling their abortion stories, and I told mine. I think once we get out of the shadows, and I think the LGBT movement has led the way in this, it normalizes what should be an open and honest conversation."

Where has she been?  I remember reading gay and feminist newsletters 40 years ago that were excited about being "open and honest," . . . and ghoulish.

She's one who already had three children and thought that was the perfect size for her family, so she aborted the fourth.  A full sibling of her other three.  They didn't get a vote; nor did the one she killed.

Capitalism is progressive, socialism is not

"The champions of socialism call themselves progressives, but they recommend a system which is characterized by rigid observance of routine and by a resistance to every kind of improvement. They call themselves liberals, but they are intent upon abolishing liberty. They call themselves democrats, but they yearn for dictatorship. They call themselves revolutionaries, but they want to make the government omnipotent. They promise the blessings of the Garden of Eden, but they plan to transform the world into a gigantic post office. Every man but one a subordinate clerk in a bureau, what an alluring utopia! What a noble cause to fight for!"
- Ludwig von Mises  https://mises.org/library/bureaucracy

When did Democrats get so prissy and delicate about smutty talk?

"Rap lyrics celebrate the assault of women all day long, and our pop stars twerk for the precise purpose of attracting lewd attention, and some of these artists are fêted at the White House and elsewhere as role models for young people. My friends—even some of my pious Christian friends—watch and celebrate Game of Thrones, which if I understand correctly, features graphic depictions of the demeaning of women and everyone else.

Bill Maher, hero to the Left (and likewise to some on the Right for his straight talk about Islam), has a foul mouth and celebrates his hanging out at the Playboy Mansion, where people are known to behave in the way Trump describes, and that is perfectly cool. Even Ann Coulter wants to be friends with him.

President Kennedy joked about his presidency being like a golf course; I will spare you the foul punch line if you don’t already know it. Senator Ted Kennedy was caught in flagrante delicto drunk and palming waitresses. Bill Clinton is a known sexual predator. Joe Biden has often been shown on camera being far too handsy with pretty women."

 http://amgreatness.com/2016/10/08/lewdness-donald-trump/

Why Clinton's media buddies focused on Trump all week-end

What's with this woman and putting people in containers like buckets and baskets? Does she have a refrigerated box for baby parts from the little ones who won't grow up to vote?

Here's what Secretary Clinton said about Bernie's supporters in a speech for Goldman Sachs. “This coalition, a collection of generally under-represented, low social capital individuals has become increasingly networked and increasingly motivated. This group that our analysts are calling the ((Makes air quotes)) bucket of losers could not only be a significant force in the next election but could, on an outside percentile, even win.”

Then for the older crowd: "In lucrative paid speeches that Hillary Clinton delivered to elite financial firms but refused to disclose to the public, she displayed an easy comfort with titans of business, embraced unfettered international trade and praised a budget-balancing plan that would have required cuts to Social Security, according to documents posted online Friday by WikiLeaks."

 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/hillary-clinton-speeches-wikileaks.html?_r=0

You can see why her media buddies focused on Trump all week-end, instead of her leaked speeches.

Specimens ready to ship

What has Trump done? Internet meme

 

"Last night a friend claimed that Donald Trump wouldn’t make a good president; he is brash, he is racist, he is a loudmouth; you know the normal things people learn to recite after being programmed by television news. The one I loved was that, “Trump is arrogant.” My friend questioned if one man could make “that much difference in the world today.” To my friend's credit, she was respectful enough to let me respond when she asked, “Really, what has Trump done?”

I said, “In June of last year, Trump entered the race for president. In just a little over a year, Trump has single handedly defeated the Republican party. He did so thoroughly. In fact, he did so in such a resounding way that the Republican Party now suffers from an identity crisis. He literally dismantled the party. Trump even dismantled and dismissed the brand and value of the Bush family.

Trump has Obama petrified that Trump will dismiss programs that weren’t properly installed using proper law.

Trump has single handedly debunked and disemboweled any value of news media as we knew it—news now suffering from an all-time level of distrust and disrespect.

Trump has leaders from all over the world talking about him, whether good or bad. Trust me, powerful men who have been president before weren’t liked by the global community. I doubt Mikhail Gorbachev liked Reagan when Reagan said, "Tear down that wall."

Trump has expressly disclosed the fraud perpetrated on the American public by Hillary Clinton. He has, quite literally, brought Hillary to her knees—if you believe that nervous tension and disorders offer physical side effects and damage.

Trump has unified the silent majority in a way that should be patently frightening to “liberals.”

As the press accuses Trump of being a house of cards, Trump has proven the press is the real house of cards. He has whipped up the entire establishment into pure panic. Trump has exposed them for who they are and worse, what they are. George Clooney was right when he said Trump draws live news coverage of his podium that he’s not yet approached. Thanks, George, you were perfectly correct.

What we see as headline news today are actually the last bubbles from the ship that is now sunk—meaning the standard news media, as a propaganda machine, has been exposed. They have no more value.

In the same way Trump asked the African-American community this question, I asked my friend, ”At this point, what do you have to lose?” We have mass cop shootings, riots in our streets, ambushed cops, double digit inflation, bombs blowing up in our cities, targeted police, BLM, a skyrocketing jobless rate, no economic growth, privately owned land being seized by the federal government, the worst racial tension in my lifetime, no God in schools, more abortions than ever, illegal aliens pouring into our country, sick veterans receiving no care, and a debt that doubled in seven years to $19 trillion. Are you really happy with the condition of the current system?

One man has done all of this in one year—one guy, and on his own dime. And with everything I’ve written above, you believe Trump hasn't done anything? You claim that you are afraid of Donald Trump? No wonder we’re in trouble. You can say that Trump is a lousy presidential candidate. That’s your right. Just don’t ever say he’s not effective.

That Megan Kelly, FOX News, CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post, the New York Times, Raleigh’s News and Observer, the AP, Don Lemon, Jake Tapper, and many more, failed to implement their collectively orchestrated lie on the American people against Trump, is actually a massive testament to Trump. The press colluded pure propaganda to accomplish his demise … and they have collectively failed and miserably.

Here's just one example of how badly America is injured right now. There are high school football players on their knees during the national anthem simply because the press used as propaganda to program those kids to do that very thing. But, these kids are mimicking NFL stars the same way the same kids chooses which brand of football shoe to purchase—they're overtly brain-washed to do that very thing.

Now, we have a generation of children who hate America.

America’s problem isn’t that little children are on their knee in collective disrespect of America. Our problem is that America is on her knee from collective disrespect by Americans.

You can disrespect America all you want. But, it’s high-time you respect the silent majority. Because they’re not simply the “silent majority” as you’ve been trained to believe when Hillary calls them “deplorables.” The fact is, they are simply the majority. And now they're no longer silent either. Donald Trump changed all of that, single-handedly and within one year.

" From Be Forbes."
Bebe Coe Bertino

[I've tried to find a better reference for this, and there is a Bebe Coe Bertino on Facebook, but whether he wrote this or just copied it from another source, I can't determine.]

What the Friday Wikileaks showed about Clinton

"If you were wondering if a Trump candidacy was any worry to Clinton, then wonder no more.

The hacked emails released by Wikileaks shows an interesting tidbit about how the Democrats looked at the idea of a Trump candidacy, and you can safely see that of all the candidates Hillary actively wanted to face, Trump was on the list.
...

Calling them the "pied piper" candidates, team Hillary describes Trump, Cruz, and Carson as nominees that could - if handled properly - make the extreme the mainstream.

"We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to them seriously," it said in the email.

The summary is that the DNC and the Clinton campaign wanted Trump to be Hillary's opponent because they knew his extreme stances could be used to alienate and divide. They could then use these candidates to paint the Republican party as a whole as something dangerous.

Trump was a tool for Hillary's campaign all along. She wanted the press to take Trump seriously, put him up as the most viable option for Republicans, and the right took the bait, hook, line, and sinker. Now with the Trump campaign burning to the ground, and GOP leaders walking away due to his recent comments, the Clinton campaign's plan to put Hillary on top is coming to fruition.

In short, the Republicans have been played. Trump was a unknowing puppet for Hillary from the get-go, and the right - though some had very strong suspicions - didn't know it."

 http://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/10/08/leaked-emails-show-trump-tool-used-hillary-campaign-day-one/