More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global
Scientists Continue to Debunk “Consensus” in 2008 and 2009. You are going to be heavily taxed and perhaps your job destroyed on faulty, bogus "scientific" claims about the dangers of C02. Read this Senate report before you accept a word of Obama's threats to destroy more of the American automobile industry and tax Americans with an additional $1300 per car.“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.
“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.
“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.
“There are simple facts in such abundance that the media never reports. When the media lambastes a great (skeptical) scientist and brave patriot, Jack Schmitt, a geologist, astronaut and former senator for apostasy, you know that it isn't science they're talking about, but agendas. Schmitt knows more about the Earth and its environment than all the staff at The New Mexican put together. Listen to a proven scientist,” Geologist Dr. Seymour Merrin, a Fellow of the Geological Society of America and a research scientist.
. . . and many others. We are being deceived for a social agenda.
Posts
4 comments:
Impressive! 700 in the entire world huh? That sounds like a lot! Until you consider that out 3,146 who were surveyed in America alone in Jan '08, 97% agree that it's man made.
This reminds me of the evolution/creationist debate where people like you trotted out what you thought was an impressive sounding number of scientists who disputed evolution only to be outnumbered by an even larger number of scientists who shot down their claim--and these were just the scientists who shared the same first name as Steven Jay Gould!
I bet you just hate how facts always have such a liberal bias, don't you?
I love facts. Even from liberal librarians. But it's also a fact that the press pretends there is a consensus, and that my dear friend is what this entry is about. I don't care a bit if evolution is taught in the schools--I certainly heard it my entire life and looked around and knew it wasn't true. It doesn't hurt a kid to hear about it, nor will it fry the delicate brain of a liberal to find out there are other view points.
If 3,146 flights landed safely and 700 crashed, your buddy would have a differet view of consensus. He'd be riding horseback.
Lol! So 97% agreement among the people who know what they're talking about means nothing, it's only a consensus if the scientists also agree with you whether you know what you're talking about or not.
Post a Comment