I'm not a fan of ruling by Executive Order, but it can indicate a direction if not illegal, just as the orders can be undone by the next president of a different political bent—as in DACA and the Paris “Accord.” Just how evil is the Trump record that women who were interviewed on the Jan. 20 march spoke of (when coherent)? They were having these marches all over the country, even in little Rockford. The were billed as addressing women’s issues (like MeToo), but in fact they were hate trump events.
"Over his first 100 days in 2017, Trump signed two executive orders that support women in business: the Promoting Women in Entrepreneurship Act, which encourages entrepreneurial programs that recruit and support women, and the Inspiring the Next Space Pioneers and Innovators and Explorers Act, which directs NASA to encourage women and girls to study science, technology, engineering and mathematics and to pursue careers in aerospace." (reported in Forbes, April 27, 2017)
This in addition to using his influence in a World Bank plan to encourage women in business. And all those raises, bonuses, promotions, stock sharing in the private sector due to the tax cut. They went to women, as well as fattening their pension plans. A small pension is a problem for women who often do not have the longevity in the employment, and no one can live a normal retirement on Social Security alone, as the sugar daddy federal government pretends.
Women have traditionally voted Democratic, especially single women, because they want something like spousal assistance and safety net, without the cooking, cleaning and snoring. They are willing to go along with the abuses to their liberty in order to have the "security."
Thursday, January 25, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment