Thursday, October 09, 2008

A Tangled Web of Housing Grants

Since 1978 "NeighborWorks has been helping create opportunities for homeownership through NeighborWorks® America, local NeighborWorks organizations and Neighborhood Housing Services of America." Considering the amount of money they've been pulling down, I'm surprised anyone is left to recruit for the program! Just teasing. The money goes to fund their offices and salaries just as in most government programs.

Why, just last year NeighborWorks received a big chunk ($180 million) of the $360 million funds appropriated by Congress for 2008 to increase the availability of foreclosure counseling services across the country, and they're getting another $180 million from the newest bailout. Grants are being made to fund foreclosure counseling and legal assistance to homeowners at risk of foreclosure to housing counseling intermediaries approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Of course, if you sign up to take one of their classes so you can counsel people in foreclosure who were probably counseled by one of NeighborWorks home ownership counselors, you'll have to pay over $1,000 to take the class. It's only $610 to learn how to prequalify potential buyers. Who knows where the $360 million goes--the courses certainly aren't free--maybe to pay your salary after you become a counselor?

And look who helps NeighborWorks--research and input from ACORN, and La Raza, the militant organization that wants to return our southwestern states to Mexico is on their Advisory Board. Not that advocacy groups like NeighborWorks much. Seems to be a parting of the ways when slicing and dicing the poorer communities.

And you should see the career opportunities in this organization. Big time. I don't know how many poor get into homes, but there are bunches of high level administrative jobs for bureaucrats like DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION, Senior Corporate Partnership Development Manager, and PRESIDENT/CEO! And you can work in the nice trendy suburbs of DC (except for that one with the Navajos--you need to go to NM and have a brokers license).

How buyers were lured into home ownership they couldn't afford

In June 2005, Black Enterprise was encouraging potential minority home buyers with the following article, which contained a chart (scroll to the bottom of the article) of private and government programs to assist with low or no down payment home ownership:
    With interest rates still near historic lows and the growing popularity of low down payments and "no money down" mortgage programs, more families and individuals are taking the plunge into first-time homeownership. . . many people are still delaying building wealth through homeownership because they think they must already have the money in the bank to do it. "People assume they'll need 15% to 20% down to get their first home, which is simply not the case these days." [said Pierre Dunagan, president of The Dunagan Group].

    Fannie Mae, while not a lending institution itself, is a government-sponsored enterprise that buys loans from lenders to make mortgage financing available to more borrowers. A number of financing programs that don't require the standard 20% down payment -- or any down payment at all -- are available through approved Fannie Mae lenders and mortgage companies. One of them is the Flexible 100 program, which is especially popular with first-time home buyers. Borrowers need only contribute $500 toward the down payment and/or closing costs. The Flexible 97 program, which allows borrowers to put up just 3% of the cost of the home, is also available through Fannie Mae. Banks have created similar programs to help new home buyers. . .

    SPECIAL PROGRAMS MAKE IT EASIER
    Many of the new loan products for first-time home buyers have been created specifically to make homeownership easier, says Fannie Mae spokesperson Sandy Cutts. "In addition to our Flex programs, we have the Expanded Approval/Timely Payment Rewards program for people with less than perfect credit. With this program, the homeowner makes on-time payments for two years, then after that time, their interest rate automatically lowers," she explains.

    Cutts also says Fannie Mae has rolled out a new pilot product called the Payment Power program, which allows borrowers to defer two monthly payments a year -- but no more than 10 over the life of the loan -- in exchange for slightly higher interest rates. The loan reamortizes, meaning that the skipped payments are recalculated into the remaining payments. This program may be especially beneficial for people who hold seasonal jobs, such as teachers and construction workers who may not have an income during certain times of the year.

    Dunagan says there are also 100% financing programs available for first-time home buyers but, in some cases, they have higher interest rates and higher private mortgage insurance costs. He says deciding whether having a higher interest rate is better than long-term renting is an important decision prospective home buyers will have to make.
One of the programs listed in this article is AmeriDream, which as near as I can determine was a shell game founded in 1999 under the Clinton Administration whereby builders “donated” the down payment to a charity (AmeriDream), took a charitable deduction, and then that was gifted to the buyer. The buyer was actually charged that amount more for the house, plus paid a fee to AmeriDream, but it looked like they had the down payment to qualify for a loan. By law the seller gifting the buyer is illegal, and of course it hurt many buyers in the long run, who would have been better off saving first, buying later. The AmeriDream program was eliminated on July 30, 2008, after which Representatives Gary Miller, Maxine Waters, and Christopher Shays introduced legislation to reauthorize and reform the charitable down payment assistance funded in part by sellers. The program was eliminated by legislation signed by President Bush on July 30, 2008. It still has a website, and is appealing for funds--and its life.

The Black Enterprise article has links to some other programs--Austin, Sacramento, Washington, DC, etc. but I haven't looked at all of them. Some sites I googled no longer exist--I suspect the companies have gone under with their clients.

Cheers for GWB for eliminating AmeriDream, but I suspect it will resurrect itself after Maxine can show her face in public again. Miller and Shays serve on the House finance and banking committee, and Shays is up for reelection.

Creating the meltdown
--a rousing cheer for the Democrats

Fannie, Freddie, Sallie,
Barry, Nancy, Harry,
Barney, Chris and good ol' Joe
Watch our pensions as they go

Yeah team Democrats!
Boomers, Yuppies and the old
On team Democrats!
Watch our pennies not our gold.

A house of very shaky cards
with old junkers in the yards,
On the backs of working poor
Now you're checking us for more.

Yeah team Democrats!
Boomers, Buppies and the cool
On team Democrats!
More control for which you drool.

Their dream, our nightmare

Ordinary people get it. Why doesn't Congress?

In one month, we've lost more value in our retirement funds than the value of the mortgages of many of the home buyers the government is trying to bail out. Why are we being punished for the misdeeds of Congress, who actually alotted $20,000,000 a year to protect buyers from "predatory lenders" while forcing banks to make risky loans.

We played by the rules--bought our first house in 1961--didn't exceed credit limits or go into consumer debt, lived in a crummy neighborhood, got fixed rate mortgages, fixed up our homes and never missed a payment. We weren't the ones who thought low income workers had to have "the American dream." We actually understood from 47 years of home ownership that a home isn't an investment, it's a place to live that you care about more than the place you rent. Period.

But Congress thought it was a good idea to provide NINJA loans (no income, no job, no assets) and push low income people into the suburbs to fill up cheaply built houses where they had no network of friends, services or church and a long drive to work. Not the best place to be when gasoline prices started to soar due to more diddling by Congress with e-regulations.

All this was encouraged by the other dream--"wealth redistribution" and "justice" (just-us) pushed by the left, by church groups and "organizers" with their hand out, like ACORN, and the clever entrepreneur real estate home flippers, and wealthy CEOs atop the Fortune 400 who never miss a chance to make a buck with government loop-holes.

Now you want to hand out below market rates to rescue these mortgages, and that's what got my retirement account where it is? Are you guys crazy? Why do you want to rescue people who couldn't make it the first time, but not me who did?

Let's stop grilling CEOs

For now. I don't care if they make $90 million a minute, if it's legal and their stockholders don't object. Franklin Raines (formerly of Fannie Mae) made far more than Hillary Clinton and Barney Frank who both make way more than I do, and after the first million or so, I lose track of who is being greedy.

First, let's serve up some toasted Congress for public heckling, disgrace, fines and prison.

So just how did a little ACORN bring down the mighty oak of our economy? By manipulating some very vague regulations about how banks should treat low income applicants for mortgages in a social engineering law of the 1970s. Doesn't this sound innocent enough? But it's a recipe for blackmail once ACORN started realizing they could rake in big money from the government by spinning off smaller groups to get government grants (millions and millions from HUD) and big pay-offs from the banks (more millions in hush money).
    The OCC encourages community and civic organizations, government, and other members of the public to express their views about a bank’s CRA performance to the bank and the OCC at the earliest possible time. This allows the bank to address any concerns and the OCC to take the public’s views into account in evaluating the bank’s CRA record and reaching conclusions about its performance ratings. If those comments are sent to the OCC, the OCC will also consider them when reviewing applications covered by the CRA. OCC Link
Some of you "get" the voter fraud stories we see about ACORN every election cycle--just 6,000 votes have determined a president in Ohio [Carter], the swing state, and this year they probably bussed in that many homeless in our one week marathon of register and vote the same day. Fox is all over this story today. Why not go directly to START? Voters and investors should be more outraged about how they've set in place the machinations to destory your retirement income (46% of Americans are invested in the stock market which has just recently lost trillions).

“Critics of the notion that CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) had a major impact on the subprime crisis ask how a law passed in 1977 could have caused a crisis in 2008? The answer has a lot to do with ACORN — and the critical years of 1990-1995.”

Read the whole story. Planting Seeds of Disaster; ACORN, Barack Obama, and the Democratic party. By Stanley Kurtz

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

The new racist vocabulary

The left just keeps embarrassing itself looking for new ways to cry "RACIST!" First it was "dressing a Moose," according to that Floridian Hastings, whose only regret is he wasn't clearer in how he called her a racist. Then "palling around" with a terrorist (Bill Ayers, a person of pallor) was a racist comment according to a hypersensitive AP writer. And now they've gone berserk over "that one." Obama can be "the one," but not "that one." And to think Hip Hopsters make millions with the "N" word. And yet, look at what his running mate called him and the left tolerated and even rewarded that.
    Biden has a long history of making statements that get him in trouble. He was forced to apologize to Obama almost the moment he entered the race for president after he was quoted as describing Obama as "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," a remark that drew criticism for being racially insensitive. [Press Democrat]
The left is truly losing it.

Bill Ayers, proud terrorist, stands on the American flag, but Palin is called a racist for pointing out his long standing friendship with the Obamas.

Sarah Palin and the rape kits

Here's another favorite lie of the left about Palin.
    The Boston Globe editors opine about Sarah Palin and the rape kit allegations. The only problem is they ignore any facts that are inconvenient to their stated position, which is, apparently, that Palin is akin to the Anti-Christ, but more evil. Link.

    It begins with the headline, "Wasilla Made Rape Victims Pay." Except that there's no evidence that any rape victim was ever charged by the town. In fact, the town has financial records indicating they did pay for rape kits during Palin's time as mayor.

    The Globe writes, "The policy so outraged the Alaska Legislature that in 2000 it passed unanimously a bill forbidding such fees." As discussed earlier, in six separate hearings on the legislation, Wasilla was never mentioned. Other, much larger jurisdictions like Juneau were mentioned as places where victims were being charged. During those hearings, the deputy commissioner of Alaska’s Department of Public Safety testified that he had never found a police agency that had billed a victim.
They are so afraid, so very afraid, of a woman. It really is in a class with the Bush Derangement Syndrome.

The Effort Diet

Seth says that effort is more important than luck, and suggests you try his diet
    . . . here's a bootstrapper's/marketer's/entrepreneur's/fast-rising executive's effort diet. Go through the list and decide whether or not it's worth it. Or make up your own diet. Effort is a choice, at least make it on purpose:

    1. Delete 120 minutes a day of 'spare time' from your life. This can include TV, reading the newspaper, commuting, wasting time in social networks and meetings. Up to you.

    2. Spend the 120 minutes doing this instead:
    1. Exercise for thirty minutes.
    2. Read relevant non-fiction (trade magazines, journals, business books, blogs, etc.)
    3. Send three thank you notes.
    4. Learn new digital techniques (spreadsheet macros, Firefox shortcuts, productivity tools, graphic design, html coding)
    5. Volunteer.
    6. Blog for five minutes about something you learned.
    7. Give a speech once a month about something you don't currently know a lot about.

    3. Spend at least one weekend day doing absolutely nothing but being with people you love.

    4. Only spend money, for one year, on things you absolutely need to get by. Save the rest, relentlessly.

    If you somehow pulled this off, then six months from now, you would be the fittest, best rested, most intelligent, best funded and motivated person in your office or your field. You would know how to do things other people don't, you'd have a wider network and you'd be more focused.

    It's entirely possible that this won't be sufficient, and you will continue to need better luck. But it's a lot more likely you'll get lucky, I bet.

Where have you been all my (blogging) life?

Today I found Dennis. He's a library director and theologian. Can't imagine I've not had him on my links, unless he fell off during one of my remodelings or has used a pseudonym.
    "Dennis Ingolfsland: I usually write these commentaries in the evenings or weekends from my recliner (hence the name, Recliner Commentaries). I am a library director with masters' degrees in library science and theological studies. I also have a doctor of philosophy in religion and society. I've published about 30 articles, 50 book reviews, numerous scholarly conference papers and I have an insatiable interest in almost everything."
Wow. He's written more on the current campaign and Obama than I have! Wow. What a guy.

Obama votes pro-growth 0%; McCain 94%

Take a look at your portfolio if you are over 50. Does it have time to recover with a 0% growth President?

These are pro-growth issues. These issues are what will keep you and yours employed, traveling, attending good schools, enjoying a night out, redecorating your home, buying that new car, having a nice retirement, keeping the lights on, reading new books, buying the grandkids some great toys at Christmas and birthdays, choosing what you want to listen to on the radio or watch on TV, what indoor temperature you prefer, what doctor you’ll go to, how much of your parents’ estate you’ll inherit, and a multitude of other things perhaps you’ve forgotten you’ll miss if they are taken away.
  1. Making the Bush tax cuts permanent
  2. Death tax repeal
  3. Cutting and limiting government spending
  4. Social Security reform with personal retirement accounts
  5. Expanding free trade
  6. Legal reform to end abusive lawsuits
  7. Replacing the current tax code
  8. School choice
  9. Regulatory reform and deregulation
Check out the Club for Growth

Americans for Tax Reform ask Obama

Here.

Most small business profits are taxed at the top marginal tax rate. Is now the time to raise this rate? In what way will your tax hikes on small businesses help Main Street?

The capital gains and dividends tax rate help set the value of the stock market. With the Dow under 10,000, is now the time to raise these tax rates?

Specifically, which of your policies will increase the value of the average American’s 401(k)?

Sen. Biden has said paying higher taxes is “patriotic”. Do you agree with him?

Historically, trade protectionism has served to cause and deepen economic recessions. As president, are you prepared to buck the labor unions and work for bilateral and regional free trade agreements?

Do you support the expansion and new creation of domestic nuclear power plants as a clean, safe and reliable source of energy?

As president, would you protect a worker’s right to a private, democratic ballot when deciding on whether or not to join a union?

As a top recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, do you feel that you have a conflict of interest in fixing the housing mess?

Looking into the camera, could you explain to the family of every police officer in America why it is okay to associate with William Ayers?

Just because the debate is over, you don't need to stop asking about his tax-us more plan.

Good source for conservative news

Check here for some headlines. OK, so they missed me, but I did get an offer the other day to join some blogger service for pay. I thanked him and said No. If I did this for pay it wouldn't be fun. Although if my Democratic dumbed down investments go further into the basement, I might have to reconsider. I wonder where I put that?

Annoyed Librarian has gone over to the other side. She's actually going to blog for ALA. Couldn't believe it.

Whose tax plan gets us where we need to go?

"According to the Tax Policy Center, around 78% of the McCain tax cut would accrue to the top fifth of income earners, with almost 30% going to the highest 1%. This seems inequitable on its face, a point the Obama campaign and the press focus on.

As it happens, the top fifth of earners currently pay 67% of all federal taxes -- including not just income taxes, but payroll taxes, corporate taxes and death taxes. The top 1% of earners pay 26% of all federal taxes.

If the McCain proposal were passed, the top fifth would actually pay a greater share of total federal taxes and the top 1%'s share would decline by only 0.3%. In other words, high earners carry the vast majority of the federal tax burden and, despite what the media portrays as a shift from Scandinavian egalitarianism to Latin American inequity, would continue to do so under Mr. McCain's plan. . .

As it happens, the McCain proposal would maintain current income tax rates and lower corporate taxes to help American businesses -- which ultimately provide American jobs and pay American wages -- compete in a global economy"


The Rich pay their fair share

No preconditions for the tea party with Ahmadinejad

And we’re not talking about misinformation passed out by Joe Biden at last week's debate, either. No, it's the religious Left (and some not so religious, and a few not so Left). The Christians, of course, were simply following their community organizer's command some 2000 years ago to "Go therefore and eat together and hold a dialogue, but forget about worshiping me and baptizing them; just use your own plan."
    “In a fourth encounter over two years, American church officials shared an Iftar meal with the visiting Iranian president on September 28 in New York City. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad earlier in the day had delivered his usual rant against Israel and the United States at the United Nations. But hosting religious officials, anxious for dialogue, were undeterred. Nor were they were intimidated by boisterous demonstrators outside their Manhattan hotel, where some placards demanded: "No Feast with the Beast."
Who’s responsible for this travesty?
    The Mennonite Central Committee, the Americans Friends Service Committee (Quakers), the World Council of Churches' UN Liaison Office and Religions for Peace. About 300 religious representatives attended, mostly American church officials, but also including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, leftist Jewish Renewal movement chief Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb, a Zoroastrian priest, and former Norwegian Prime Minister Kjell Bondevik, a Lutheran minister.” . . .“The other denominations that sent representatives to the Iftar dinner included the United Methodist Church, Episcopal Church and Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), all of which, along with the UCC, have recently rejected anti-Israel divestment initiatives, thanks partly to appeals from American Jews.”
The National Council of Churches, in an unusually wise move for a left of center Christian group, boycotted the party for Amadinejad due to his hateful language, behavior, and screwed up views of history.

Then there was the usual, naive woman asking questions later.
    “United Methodist Women's chief Harriett Jane Olson told Reuters afterwards that she wished Ahmadinejad had talked about "practical issues" such as the treatment of women and children in Iran instead of abstract theology."
Story at Weekly Standard.

Fritz Hoffman

The central Ohio art scene lost a wonderful friend Sunday with the death of Fritz Hoffman. Every day we enjoy two of his wonderful watercolors (he was AWS and OWS) that hang in our dining room and my husband was in an artist luncheon group with him as well as community organizations. In recent years Fritz had changed to oils, and my husband thinks they may even be better than his watercolors, but I find that hard to imagine. Here is the obituary from today's Columbus Dispatch. He will be greatly missed.
    HOFFMAN Frederick R. Hoffman "Fritz", age 78, went home to be with his Lord and Savior on October 5, 2008. He served in the Army during the Korean Conflict, was Vice President of Burkholder Flint and Nichols Advertising Agency, was also active in C.O.W.S., A.W.S and O.W.S. Fritz is preceded in death by his parents Frederick and Susie Hoffman. He is survived by his loving wife, Joanne of 50 years; daughters, Betsy (Steve) Leitwein, Kathy (Jerry) Cutler; grandchildren, Steven (Ashley) Leitwein, Drew Leitwein, Jessica Cutler, Kaitlin Cutler; great-grandchild, Olivia Leitwein; sister, Barbara Hoch; nieces, nephews and many friends. Family will receive friends at SCHOEDINGER NORTHWEST CHAPEL 1740 Zollinger Rd., Friday, October 10, 2008 from 5-8 p.m. to celebrate Fritz's life. A private family service will be held at a later time. In lieu of flowers, contributions may be made to the charity of ones choice.

John McCain's arms

I hate to watch John McCain. I usually have to leave the room or switch channels. My body just aches when I see his poor, damaged arms. I'm such a wimp. I should be asking myself, "I wonder how many hours or minutes Barack Obama would survive if tortured for his country and his beliefs?" When I see what McCain has given up in just being comfortable in his body, I wonder which pains him more, an electorate who thinks it doesn't matter if we run out again on our allies, or his own broken body.

Recommended by a Canadian!

"As a pro-America conservative Canadian, I enjoyed this book so much. Lots of answers to some very confusing questions like Public Health Care, Defense and Foreign Policies, role of the US in the world and many more. If you're a liberal, you should read this to understand more about our point of views. If you're a right winger, you still need this great handbook to defend yourself against the Lunatic Leftists. Highly Recommended!" [Amazon Review]

I haven't read too much of this title--already know a lot of it, but it's got some great notes, charts, definitions and web sites. Conservatives need something like this to come up against the in-your-face Alinsky-trained almighty Obamites. And can you believe this was actually at my very liberal public library branch? Throwing a bone to the conservatives in town who pay their salaries. I was so thrilled, but I noticed the titles with which it was keeping company (the ones not checked out but sitting on the new book shelf). I've probably missed a few left and right, but I'm going by cover and spine titles. It's a little like trying to take photos of all the out of state license plates where the Dems were registering voters this past week--gotta work fast.
    The political mind

    Right is wrong

    The wrecking crew

    The trainwreck

    The last campaign

    A time it was

    Know your power

    The good fight

    Bush's law

    Fire breathing liberal

    Step by step

    Against the tide

    A time to fight

    Who killed the Constitution

    Your government failed you

    Guantanamo diary
and then there were twenty-one "green titles," from gardening to jobs, too many to list, and not all worthless of course, but many hyping the human caused global climate change myth (it's very lucrative for business, but especially publishers).

I won't provide the links to these title--sometimes librarians just yawn and point when you ask a question (I never did, but I've seen it done). But in case you noticed how the list lists to the left, I'll remind you that among journalists, they are 5 to 1, liberal to conservative; out in Hollywood in the entertainment industry they are 11 to 1, liberal to conservative; but the library profession is 223 to 1, liberal to conservative. Dixie Chicks and Barbra Streisand have nothing on your local library staff selecting titles from LJ and PW while posting their banned books list.

The next bailout

says Sue Shellenbarger in today's WSJ is your adult children. Sorry Sue. Hate to break the bad news, but Americans have already done that. Boomers were bailed by their parents, and the boom-lets and boom-lights even more so by their boomer parents. No one in America is allowed to have a living standard less wonderful than their parents' it seems. That was a constant riff in the "this economy" theme we've heard the past seven years, and probably before that, because Democrats didn't invent that, I think Republicans did.

My husband's parents (who were younger than mine) didn't help us much--all their disposable income that wasn't needed for the basics like housing, food, clothing went for alcohol, cigarettes and nice vacations. My husband during one stint in college lived with the parents of his best friend, not his own parents. This dear woman even fed him and bought him a winter coat. But my parents certainly chipped in. A lot. It was sort of a family tradition. My great-grandfather had helped my maternal grandmother, and on the other side, my great-grandmother had helped Dad buy his first home. Dad provided for my college education, of course, at least until I was married, then it became a loan to be paid back (and I did). He gave us $1,000 for our first home (a duplex) which didn't have to be paid back, and then took a second mortgage for us on his own savings account (that was paid back). He also sold us my mother's car, which we made payments on. But still, for the 1960s when we had no credit of our own, that was a big help. The irony is we actually inherited more from my in-laws, who'd never given us a dime, than my own parents who had so carefully managed their own resources. That really doesn't matter, since we're grateful to both families not only for their love, but their limited resources the government didn't tax away, so that I could retire at 60 instead of 65.

For our daughter, things were fairly straight forward--we had purchased stock for her (Wendy's) that had recovered from the bust in the 80s and reinvested the dividends (and hid it from her in her late teen years). We'd also taken out a life insurance policy after she left home and it had some value when she cashed it in. The money we had "sheltered" for her when she was very young designated for college was long gone by the time she wanted to buy a house, because we'd made the mistake of using her SS# which meant at 18 she had control, not us. That money went to buy a car to replace the one wrecked by a drunk driver who hit her while she was waiting at a stop light.

For our son we had to be a bit more creative to be "fair," and we won't know for years if we helped or hurt him. His stock tanked and was worthless, and we couldn't get insurance for him. His childhood college account also went for other things that young adulthood required and he had access by then. So after his divorce we purchased a home for him, a wonderful place where he could garden and run his big dog. We used our assets to qualify for a low interest ARM, and he made all the payments. He now owns it (with the bank) and we gave him the equity that he had built up by faithfully paying the mortgage and paying all the expenses for four years.

Of course, we hadn't counted on the government so badly managing the mortgage market with the same good intentions we had that it would bring down the economy. We knew some of the places we looked at with him in 2004 had bizarre financing options (NINJA), but although tempted, we took the "conservative" route, and took on the debt ourselves after years of having no debt at all except for a few months of a "bridge loan" when we bought our condo. We did far more than our parents had done for us, but still within the family tradition of the 19th and 20th centuries being the financial safety net for adult children. However, we live in a two-income household society, and try as I might to interfere, he hasn't found a wife to help with the cost of living and a mortgage. So being a brand new home owner in a neighborhood where many foreclosure signs are popping up may be tough if the credit market tumbles even further and affects his job.

But just like the social engineers in Washington, we believed home ownership was right and "a right" for all Americans, especially our children. It may take years to straighten all this out, and there could be more bailing in our immediate future.

Who is more dangerous?

Over at Democratic Underground dotcom which seems to be a discussion board (I haven't found actual articles) there are 30,200 posts about Sarah Palin and 5,270 about Bill Ayers and his relationship to Obama. Most of those Ayers posts are how to refute, stomp on, deny and disclaim that he has any link to Obama other than just a harmless fuzz ball from the neighborhood. I didn't even bother to check on what they're saying about Sarah, but obviously as a woman not defined by leftist feminism, she's a terrible threat to the Democratic Underground.

Definitions of leaks

Some bloggers do have ears for the leaks, but mainly those go straight from the government's lips to AP, NYT or WSJ "sources" then the bloggers go to work. I wrote about this maybe 2.5 years ago, and found these definitions really interesting. Leaks about the current financial crisis weren't too important. It was all out there loud and clear. Even the talking heads could hear Maxine and Barney defending Fannie, and no one cared because their own portfolios were doing fine. We all wanted to believe the house of cards built in the suburbs was the "American dream" for people who couldn't afford it.

Source: Stephen Hess. The Government/Press Connection: Press Officers and their Offices. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution, 1984. 77-79;

Ego Leak: Giving information primarily to satisfy a sense of self.

Goodwill Leak: Information offered to “accumulate credit” as a play for a future favor.

Policy Leak: A straightforward pitch for or against a proposal using some document or insider information as the lure to get more attention than might be otherwise justified. The leak of the Pentagon Papers falls into this category.

Animus Leak: Used to settle grudges; information is released in order to cause embarrassment to another person.

Trial-Balloon Leak: Revealing a proposal that is under consideration in order to assess its assets and liabilities. Usually proponents have too much invested in a proposal to want to leave it to the vagaries of the press and public opinion. More likely, those who send up a trial balloon want to see it shot down, and because it is easier to generate opposition to almost anything than to build support, this is the most likely effect.

Whistleblower Leak: Usually used by career personnel; going to the press may be the last resort of frustrated civil servants who feel they cannot resolve their dispute through administrative channels. Hess is careful to point out that Whistleblowing is not synonymous with leaking.

Bolstered by Congress?

"Open access pioneer BioMed Central has been acquired by Springer, ScientificAmerican.com has learned.

Open access is the movement, recently bolstered by Congress, to make studies available for free online, instead of charging taxpayers who funded the research (and others) to read them. Many prominent scientists have backed it, signing on with BioMed Central and a non-profit open access publisher, the Public Library of Science". Full article and links at Scientific American.com

The idea that the federal government isn't already involved up to its eyeballs in all scientific research is bogus in itself. The only thing different about "open access" is that at one step--early publication--you should not have to pay to see what you've already paid for. You pay many times over--you fund the researchers (you've probably already paid for their education) at their various institutions through the grants they get from various government agencies, then those institutions skim a huge amount to keep the university running, including the library, which in turn keep those programs going that don't have a cash cow. This in turn eats up a huge amount of time of the faculty, which is why you are paying for your kid to be taught by a grad student from India or China, rather than a full professor, who has to be off in the lab researching and publishing so he can keep his job, which is to hire more foreign nationals to teach your kids. Then you are charged again for that research when it appears in peer-reviewed scientific journals which the library has to buy so the researchers can keep applying for more government grants. A decade ago librarians were all caught up in the idea that the internet was going to be our savior, but sadly have learned otherwise, because business and Congress were just much more clever than we were. This symbiotic relationship, this coziness between research and politics is best illustrated by the shut down of scientific debate on the hoax of human caused climate change--just one example of why science isn't impartial when you let international left wing organizations, Hollywood and Congress control it.

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Justice and Redistribution

The Christian evangelical Left parallels the rise of the radical far Left in American politics. That's why I don't see a conflict with calling Obama a Christian and a marxist. I am not one who was surprised that Obama stayed with Wright's church. Like many churches, it runs programs for the poor, such as housing, food, clothing, but it also receives funding from the government to do so. That money comes from you and me in the form of taxes. Sometimes it is a summer lunch program, sometimes it is rehabilitating older housing, or it may be career or job training (or subsidies for barely working). Christians see this as "distributive justice" (or more accurately, redistributing our wealth). There is also a far left wing among mainline protestants and Roman Catholics. Together these three groups are the Religious Left. They all have their own organizations, many of which receive money from the government as well as their denominations to fund their programs and achieve their goals, which are often in line with those of the government.

Justice in the Bible is synonymous with righteousness, which is an attribute of God. Man, made in God's image, was also righteous before the Fall, but now is a sinner and receives Jesus' righteousness by faith. The "good news" includes concern for the whole person, but leftist Christians have distorted the Biblical view with the idea that government needs to redistribute goods and services through taxation to achieve justice. Thus the state can be God's representative on earth.

The following is from Stewardship Journal, Winter 1991, "The Christian Debate over Justice and Rights" by Ronald H. Nash, 29-40.
    The most elementary analysis of the Religious Left's writings about justice makes it clear that they are interested almost exclusively in questions of distributive justice. When one's announced intention is to help the poor, it is probably inevitable that one's emphasis will be upon distributing (or rather redistributing) society's wealth. . . Political liberals concerned with distributive justice on the level of an entire society usually try to disguise the fact that the redistribution of a society's holdings they wish to institute must be enacted through coercion, that is, through the state or government forcing people in some way or other.

    On several occasions, I have heard my friend Ron Sider give eloquent appeals to rich Christians in America to spread their wealth around to help the poor. I am often mystified as to why Sider fails to tell his audiences that what he desires is for the state or government to effect his desired redistribution of wealth through force, that is, through taxation (the IRS, after all, does not suggest that one make a donation). Some of Sider's followers obviously sense that he is an apologist for higher taxes that will supposedly support greatly expanded liberal social programs. Others seem to miss this obvious point and simply get caught up in the idealism of a noble crusade to help the poor.

    Please note the big difference between Christians voluntarily giving their own money to fund programs to help the poor and the quite different situations in which agents of the state take other people's money, keep a large chunk of it to pay their inflated salaries, and use some of what's left to fund counter-productive and self-defeating programs that end up making life even more miserable for the poor. . .

    Social or distributive justice as liberals view it is possible only in a society that is controlled from the top down. There must be a central agency with the power to force people to accept the liberals' preferred pattern of distribution. . . What liberals call justice is a setting in which representatives of the state, the most powerful and coercive institution on earth, are empowered continually to take from some in order to give to others, taking care in the process that they keep enough to pay their own salaries. . .

    Devotees of liberal "social justice" often fail to see how their position leads to an aggrandizement of state power, how it enslaves people to the state. They too easily overlook the massive threat the institution of the state poses to human liberty. . .

    Christian political liberals want the state to use its vast powers of coercion to force everyone in society to help attain the Christian's ends. . . [They] often use the doctrine of Christian stewardship in an attempt to justify their commitment to statism. . . Christian stewardship is perverted into a doctrine that obliges Christians to surrender their judgment, will, and resources to the liberal state which, in the view of the Religious Left, becomes God's surrogate on earth. (p. 31)

Never believe a promise that they'll only tax the other guy

That's class warfare. Class envy. Obama can't reduce taxes for 95% of Americans, since about 1/3 don't pay taxes anyway. Here's what to remember the last time a charismatic candidate promised to tax the rich and give you a break.
    “Back when Mr. Clinton was campaigning for president in 1992, he made a pretty direct pitch: Raise taxes on people making more than $200,000, and use those revenues to fund tax relief for the "forgotten middle class."

    In an October presidential debate, then-Gov. Clinton laid out the marginal-rate increase he wanted and some of his plans for the revenue that would be brought in. He followed with a pledge:

    "Now, I'll tell you this," he said. "I will not raise taxes on the middle class to pay for these programs. If the money does not come in there to pay for these programs, we will cut other government spending, or we will slow down the phase-in of the programs."

    Mr. Clinton, of course, won that election. And as the inauguration approached, he began backtracking from his promise. At a Jan. 14, 1993, press conference in New Hampshire, he claimed that it was the media that had played up a middle-class tax cut, not him. A month later, he announced his actual plan before a joint session of Congress.

    p. 1 NYT . . . "Families earning as little as $20,000 a year will also be asked to send more dollars to Washington under the President's plan." About That Middle-Class Tax Cut . . .

Why health care insurance is so expensive

"As a state senator in Illinois, [Obama] voted to require that dental anesthesia be covered by every health plan for difficult medical cases. Today, the requirement is one of 43 mandates imposed by Illinois on health insurance, according to the Illinois Division of Insurance. Other mandates require coverage of infertility treatments, drug rehab, "personal injuries" incurred while intoxicated, and other forms of care.

By my count, during Mr. Obama's tenure in the state Senate, 18 different laws came up for a vote and passed that imposed new mandates on private health insurance. Mr. Obama voted for all of them.

As a presidential candidate, Mr. Obama says people lack health insurance because "they can't afford it." He's right. But he is also partly responsible for why health insurance is too expensive. A long list of studies show that mandates like the ones Mr. Obama has championed drive up the cost of insurance for the very people priced out of coverage." Insider scoop, By Scott Gottlieb - WSJ 05-06-08

Who's left?

I used to stare at the list of 50 or so organizations on the campus willing to help me, a poor lil'ol weak, helpless female, and wonder why with all the local, county, state and federal laws and local and national organizations in place and living in the best country in the world, I needed so much help. That was about 10 years ago. Slicing and dicing the university community into small manageable groups (academe is very liberal, in case you hadn't noticed) continues. I wondered who was not eligible in this announcement. I really think I might be eligible for something (age? marital status?) even though my Wenger ancestors left Switzerland in the 1740s. I just need to find someone who thinks blogging is important and can nominate me. If you cast your net broadly enough, I suppose you ensure your continued existance.
    “The Distinguished Diversity Enhancement Awards recognize individuals or groups who have demonstrated a significant commitment to enhancing diversity at Ohio State and to exceeding expectations in implementing the Diversity Action Plan. The program, now in its 21st year, rewards efforts to enhance diversity on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, sex, age, disability, veteran or military service status, gender identity, economic status, political belief, marital status or social background.” Recognizing excellence, OSU Resources

OSU Increases Adoption Assistance Benefit for 2009


The Adoption Assistance Program reimburses eligible employees for adoption-related expenses upon placement of a minor child in the employee's home. In 2009, the university will increase its reimbursement amount from $4,000 to $5,000 per adopted child.

Adoptions eligible for the benefit should meet the following criteria:

• Adopted children must be under 18 years of age.

• Adopted children may or may not be biologically related to either parent.

• Adoptions are made through public, private, domestic, international, and independent means.

Looks like if you adopt your own step-child, you can get $5,000.

How McCain handed the election to Obama

"McCain unaccountably failed to make his strongest argument [about the economy]. The roots of the crisis lie in both parties' encouragement of greater home ownership. But at critical points, notably in 2005, some Republicans, including McCain, called for tighter regulation of the mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This was resisted by Democrats, with no demur from obama." Michael Barone, column in Columbus Dispatch, 10-7-08.

Obama has promised so much based on taxing the rich, promoting class warfare, and now they'll all show losses. That's a lot of angry, expectant, greedy people. So, you know who's next in line for more taxes. You and me.

The Taxman Rap
by Norma Bruce
June 10, 2008

More new taxes
to buy axes
for our backses
and our neckses

for our gases
and our classes
(just the riches'
and the niches.)

Yo! Obama
Go! Oh mama
You our Papa
You Messiah.

Obama can
He is the man
He do the plan
He be the taxman.

Global Economic Challenge

C-SPAN covered an interesting conference yesterday called Global Economic Challenge. The first guy said that when he accepted the invitation to speak a year ago, he had no idea we'd be in the middle of this mess. I thought that was quite telling because I wrote a poem about the mess at Fannie and Fred in September 2007. If I noticed it, I wonder why the economists on the panel didn't. Or maybe they did and Congress stonewalled them as they did Bush.

Paul Krugman was on the panel. He and Thomas Sowell are about the only economists I've read. His comments were interesting to say the least, in that he really had no answers. He was extremely hesitant--almost as many "ahs" and "uhs" as Barack Obama as he thought his way through his responses. There were lots of "could be" and "it's not compelling" type phrases. However, in discussing how our problem has spread world wide he reminded me of something I'd completely forgotten; the Asian economic contagion of 1997-1999. The only reason I remember it at all is that it started in tiny Thailand and spread through out Asia. A Thai PhD student came to me looking for a job. Not only had her government scholarship money dried up, but her very wealthy family had been wiped out. She had even sold her jewelry. Usually I didn't hire this type of student because they often don't do well in repetitive library routines, but I felt sorry for her and for the few months she worked for me, she was able to perform some complex jobs. Her IQ probably qualified her for Mensa. As soon as the college offered her an assistantship, she quit.

Krugman did make some memorable points, however. It isn't just the trade linkages--where we're buying less from other countries and hurting their economies. Diversity, which is recommended for the private investor, actually hurts us in the global economy. Many of our assets are foreign owned, so that affects the world economy. Krugman didn't like the Paulson Plan--he joked that it should be called "Bailey Mae" or "Hanky Panky." Capital has been destroyed he said, and Paulson has "grabbed the wrong end of the stick." (Note the complex economic jargon.) He should have injected capital, but time was wasted as well as political capital.

In conclusion, with one tiny jab at the Bush Administration (the lack of blame here I think indicates that the Bush admin is not to blame) he said, "This is amazing stuff," which I'm sure the audience found helpful, and that "We need clear thinking."

Guess I'll keep checking the blogs for links to CRA and ACORN. Good intentions run amuck, or Fox watching the hen house sounds about as useful an explanation as "stuff out of whack" and "burst housing bubble."


Freddie and Fannie
Sept. 29, 2007
by Norma Bruce

Freddie and Fannie
went up to Capitol Hill
to fawn for a bigger profit
Sticking you and me with the bill.

With help from our taxes
They'll package and resell,
a windfall for the banks and rich,
for the rest of us, economic hell.

Years ago the original aim
was to help the struggling poor.
Now they seek those jumbo loans--
Congress and Bush! Show them the door!

Monday, October 06, 2008

ACORN, Obama, Ayers, Fannie, and the subprime mess

My, what a tangled web this is. Check here for the chart and explanations. They're not just sticky fingered crooks registering dead people, they're actually big time players. Also check this blog.

Start tracking the housing money in your state. You'll probably find some of the same connections.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley

"Democrats largely supported it at the time, and one of their own, Bill Clinton, signed it. Now they frame it as a Republican bill that helped send the nation on the path to perdition."

Even Bill Clinton has been interviewed recently as saying it was a good idea, and of course, he could have vetoed it. So why do we let the Democrats get away with saying it is the Republicans and deregulation's fault? Here's what happened.
    Modernized the rules, says IBD.

    The mistakes had nothing to do with the 1999 law.

    Pumping up home ownership was good for business and good for the politicians--all of them.

    A new multitrillion-dollar market emerged

    And what happened from there to cause the collapse needs to be investigated.
Well, maybe, but we sure shouldn't put Barney Frank in charge, he definitely needs to go; and congress definitely shouldn't be patting themselves on the back!

Not everyone in Chicago shrugs

New York Times was late to the story--it is after all, an Obama supporter--about Barack Obama and terrorist Bill Ayers, but Chicago never really cared much, said Editor and Publisher back in April. However,
    "Chicago's pundit class is not exactly unanimous on shrugging off the Obama/Ayers connection. Steve Chapman, a Chicago Tribune columnist of libertarian bent who also serves on the paper's editorial board, argued Sunday that the relationship, which he said Obama was disingenuously trying to downplay, does matter.

    "It's hard to imagine he would be so indulgent if we learned that John McCain had a long association with a former Klansman who used to terrorize African-Americans," Chapman wrote. "Obama's conduct exposes a moral blind spot about these onetime terrorists, who get a pass because they a) fall on the left end of the spectrum and b) haven't planted any bombs lately.

    "You can tell a lot about someone from his choice of friends. What this friendship reveals is that when it comes to practicing sound moral hygiene, Obama has work to do and no interest in doing it." "
And it's true, Bill Ayers hasn't planted any bombs lately; but he also has done no jail time like some of his buddies who committed the same crimes. Do you suppose in 20-30 years the families of the the 9/11 victims will be this casual about criminals?

Maybe it's Chicago's image of their hometown boy--it just doesn't gibe with hanging out with terrorists. They see him as a "cautious, conservative, ultra-pragmatic legislator hack."
    "But locally, Obama is far more likely to be rapped for being too palsy, or at least endorsing, the feckless president of the Cook County Board, Todd Stroger. Chicago media critic Steve Rhodes, in his blog The Beachwood Reporter, rarely lets slip an opportunity to contrast Obama's national image as a daring leader who will bring "change you can believe in" with his get-along, go-along relationship with city and Cook County political hacks."

On the campaign trail

Senator John McCain holds a rally at the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque. Gov. Sarah Palin holds rallies in Clearwater and Estero, Florida. John and Sarah are then back in Ohio on the 8th and 9th. Not sure what the attraction of Wilmington, Ohio, is--pretty liberal place. Maybe that's why she's alone. Can talk to those college kids. Joe Biden is in Wilmington, Delaware with no public events planned while he looks for that restaurant that closed 25 years ago that he lied about during the debates. Guess he doesn't get home much.

McCain seems to be wimping out--wants to be the good guy, so Sarah is sent out to soften up the opposition. He must have believed the MSM press back when they were so thrilled he was a RINO--but they will crush him now if he so much as lays a glove on Obama. You know, the crowds like Sarah, and she may be the biggest reason people are supporting him, but I'm just old fashioned enough that I don't think this is her job. Come on John. Let's see some of that toughness that got you through your POW days.

Road to Victory Rally with John McCain and Sarah Palin-Strongsville, OH
Strongsville City Commons
Corner of Rt. 81 and Rt. 42
Strongsville, OH 44136
Doors Open: 2:15pm
Wednesday, October 8th

Road to Victory Rally with Sarah Palin-Wilmington, OH
The Roberts Centre
123 Gano Rd.
Wilmington, OH 45177
Doors Open: 4:00pm
Thursday, October 9th

Sunday, October 05, 2008

Vote Democrat

Three Strikes Librarian had this on his site. Pretty good.



Mr. 3 Strikes says he's a straight male, Republican, Catholic Christian Librarian.

Sowell says we don't deserve Obama

"The media alone are not alone in keeping the facts from the public [on the Democrats' responsibility for the meltdown/bailout]. Republicans, for reasons unknown, don’t seem to know what it is to counterattack. They deserve to lose.

But the country does not deserve to be put in the hands of a glib and cocky know-it-all, who has accomplished absolutely nothing beyond the advancement of his own career with rhetoric, and who has for years allied himself with a succession of people who have openly expressed their hatred of America." Do Facts Matter?

A leader who has never led

"Obama is a cipher, an easy repository for the hopes and dreams of liberals everywhere...But if Obama avoided being battle-tested in 2004 by the grace of God, it's his own timidity that has kept his name clean since. Given his national profile and formidable political talents, he could have been a potent spokesman for Democratic causes in the Senate. Instead, he has refused to expend his political or personal capital on a single controversial issue, preferring to offer anodyne pieces of legislation and sign on to the popular efforts of others...Indeed, Obama is that oddest of all creatures: a leader who's never led. There are no courageous, lonely crusades to his name, or supremely unlikely electoral battles beneath his belt. He won election running basically unopposed, and then refused to open himself to attack by making a controversial but correct issue his own." Link here via Ali Sina.

Sina concludes Obama is a narcissist with a weak sense of self. That I don't know, however, the following is a fairly accurate description of some of his followers who feel personally attacted if you don't like him or think he is bad for America. I would like to see McCain-Palin win, but I don't feel personally attacted if you don't agree.

"The narcissist’s anger and intolerance is projected on his servile followers who also become angry and intolerant of criticism of their leader. Remember the sick symbiosis between the narcissist and his codependents? The followers get their narcissistic supply by elevating the status of their leader. The greater he looks, the better they feel. They see their glory is his glory. Conversely, when the narcissist is criticized, his followers become offended. They take those criticisms personally and their instinct of self defense is triggered. They will become vigilantes and will silence their critics through intimidation, bullying, mocking, threats and violence (like calling those who disagree with Obama, racists)."

Alinskyian trained Catholic laity

The Chickens Have Come Home to Roost: Obama, ACORN, and the Catholic Campaign for Human Development,” by Stephanie Block, The Wanderer editorial, via Illinois Review
    "For nearly forty years, The Wanderer has followed the Catholic Campaign for Human Development’s funding of radical, left-wing political organizations, many of them carrying the brand of Saul Alinsky. The Wanderer also covered the first Call to Action conference – the months of “hearings” leading up to it, its orchestrated structure and contrived demands – and our reporters commented on the Alinskyian nature of it, not merely in its tactics but in its outcomes. In hindsight, we can see that organized dissent in the Church was a product of organized parishes, filled with Alinskyian-trained laity.

    The Catholic Campaign for Human Development is responsible for that. . .

    . . . Even the politically naïve are fascinated by the pejorative dismissal of Obama as a “community organizer” and his campaign’s rebuttal that to disrespect community organizers is to disrespect Catholic Action. Obama isn’t Catholic. Catholic thought hasn’t subtly filtered into this ecumenical movement. Amoral [Saul Alinsky] thought, on the other hand, has clearly filtered into Catholic circles – to such a degree that some people confuse one for the other."

Polling the pollsters

I asked Google if Pew Research Center was liberal or conservative, because I've been reading Pew research since the late 80s and have always seen it tracking a bit to the left--not horribly, but certainly there. While I was looking for some evidence (haven't found it yet) I turned up this:
    Good Morning America on Wednesday reported on a new Quinnipiac poll that highlighted leads for Barack Obama in Florida and Ohio, but completely skipped the network's own national poll that found a tight race. A September 30 ABC News/Washington Post survey concluded that Obama leads Senator McCain by four points -- 50 to 46 percent. In contrast, GMA last week trumpeted an ABC News/Washington Post poll that showed Obama with a nine point lead. On September 24, former Democratic aide-turned journalist George Stephanopoulos touted the larger lead and asserted, "...You have to go back to 1948 for the last time when a candidate having this kind of a lead, in late September, lost." He mentioned that on the issue of the economy, the Illinois Senator is "blowing away John McCain." An onscreen graphic proclaimed: "Obama Surges Ahead." But, just a week later, GMA not only ignored findings suggesting a closer national race, the morning show highlighted a rival poll's state numbers. CyberAlert (which tracks liberal media)
The search developed because I had been listening to an NPR program which interviewed a Pew Research person who reported that confidence in the media was as low as it had been since 1973, and people didn't believe what they were being told about the bailout. But he said the media were misleading us about the bailout--at least I think that's what he said, and that calls and e-mails to Congresses were politically driven. Only the most vocal and political contacted their Congressional representative. Imagine! Wouldn't that be true of bloggers and the foot soldiers in the campaigns, too? On what basis should the electorate be contacting their representatives?

I didn't spend much time looking through the results, because Pew has set the rules for polling and it's difficult to accurately assess your own bias. But I did rediscover (used to know this) that the U.S. has the lowest voting turnout of functioning democracies. 2004 numbers were higher (60%), but usually it's about 50% (The Psychology of Media and Politics By George A. Comstock, 2005).

Everyone who says she doesn't pay attention to polls, including me, is always happy to see her own team go up in the polls.

O'Biden's tales

I had heard that there were at least 14 big ones told by old Joe at the debate Thursday night, but like the foreign money being pumped into the Obama-Biden campaign, we'll probably not see him called on it. But a few have. Here's a piece from Investor's Business Daily:
    ". . . neither Carter nor Bill Clinton, whose twists and turns before a grand jury led to his impeachment, ever stared into the camera and spouted such a string of outright fabrications as if they were gospel truths the way Barack Obama's running mate did last week.

    Thankfully, the blogosphere has been having a field day cataloguing Joe's whoppers. First, as InstaPundit's Michael Totten instantly noted after the debate, Biden — the great, seasoned foreign policy expert who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — falsely claimed France and the U.S. "kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon."

    Other whoppers on the menu:
      accusation that John McCain is soft on regulation, when in fact he tried to beef up regulations on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

      falsely claiming that Obama didn't pledge to meet with Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

      falsely claiming that Gov. Sarah Palin supported a windfall profits tax on oil companies

      saying he's always been for clean coal in spite of his record of voting against it in the Senate

      pretending he and Obama are in favor of drilling for oil

      lied about the surge

      lied about McCain's health care plan

      was 2000% off on his claims about war costs

      but, and how pitiful is this,

      the restaurant he invited folks to in Wilmington hasn't been around in decades!
    You Democrats have got yourselves a winner here. Someone who can out-deceive Bill Clinton is quite a master. There are people who believe their own lies and are insulted when called on it. Joe seems to be one of those. Obama, on the other hand, most likely knows he's lying. But, Joe is likeable and I suppose brings some gravitas to the ticket.

    Phishing Scams

    Have you been getting e-mail from Google reporting you need to download something? Or something from your bank about updating your account? Google doesn’t send those and neither do banks. Ignore them. The messages from the phony Google vary (many domain names), but all tell you that you won’t be able to log in to Google if you don’t comply. Often you can tell right away it is a bogus site, says Dennis at Almost a Newsletter by lightly passing the cursor over the link, but sometimes the crooks are really clever. For more details on the Google, bank, and career sites phishing problem, Dennis suggests Gary Warner’s CyberCrime blog.

    I get a lot of e-mail about my debt. Those automatically go in the trash through the filter (I don’t have any debt so I know they are phishing, nor do I have accounts at those banks). Some days I get about 50 messages about "returned, or non-deliverable e-mail." Those are also trashed. Then I’ll get a run of items all in Russian. Trash ‘em. Don’t get caught in the phisher’s net.

    After finishing the item at Gary's blog about Google I looked at some other entries and found his a fascinating source. Thank you, Dennis, for the link. Between the porn peddlers and the scammers, the internet has really become a cesspool. I'm beginning to think that those of us who use it for fun or legitimate information are becoming the minority.

    I’ve been following Dennis' newsletter for years from back in the 90s when I had a real web site and needed help with code. He’s upbeat, helpful and offers a lot of free tips (but you will want to buy a subscription or his e-books if you do this for a living).

    Saturday, October 04, 2008

    Founders of a library imitated their husbands’ rituals

    This year the Ida Rupp Public Library in Port Clinton, Ohio, is 100 years old. Like many libraries in the United States, this one was founded by a women’s club, The Literary and Social Club, now 127 years old. These clubs were an opportunity for women of a certain social stature to get together, study local problems and hear educational programs. The library in my little home town, Mt. Morris, Illinois, was started the same way, and became a public library in the early 1930s. Ida Rupp predeceased her husband Lawrence Rupp, and he donated money to establish a library--even designating the interior colors as azure blue to match her eyes. In my years in academe and in churches, I’ve seen designated funds and portraits come and go, and I salute Ida’s longevity! Apparently, no one has been successful at changing the name or tried to hide the portrait of her and her bird dog.

    Over at the BGSU archives are the records of the Literary and Social Club of Port Clinton as of their 100th anniversary in 1981. This organization was instrumental in creating the Lakeside Women‘s Club which also is still functioning.
      "The Ladies Social Club was formed in Port Clinton, Ohio, in 1881 for the "mutual improvement" of its members and to "aid the poor of the village." In reaction to their husband's secret lodge meetings, these women created a secret initiation ritual and designated the officers with such names as the "Superb Expounder," the "Assistant Expounder," and the "Guard." From the beginning, these women enjoyed a few hours of social interaction each month with an anti-gossip rule being strictly enforced. Later these ritualistic trappings were dropped and study topics were introduced along with a name change--the Port Clinton Literary and Social Club. Study topics included the history and literature of various countries, U.S. History, the Bible, and American biography and humor, as well as the reading of various literary works.

      Civic projects also were undertaken by this Club including the establishment of a public drinking fountain (1895), a public restroom (1910), and the public library (1908). The Club also was instrumental in organizing a sister literary group in Oak Harbor (1882) and the Lakeside Federation of Women's Clubs (1894). Today this organization could well be the oldest literary society still in existence in the State of Ohio. Histories of the Club written by members are included in the collection and provide much detail on its early years."

    Plugged in and plugged up

    "The Barack Obama presidential campaign has tapped Apple's iPhone to help deliver news and information about the candidate. It's also giving Obama's supporters a new way to help swing the campaign to Obama's favor: a Call Friends feature organizes and prioritizes contacts by key battleground states, making it easier to place grassroots political calls."

    You mean Obama supporters have friends who have iPhone who aren't already working for him? I'm shocked.

    Speaking of grassroots, I was just raking leaves and stepped in some cat feces. Boy does that stink--travels faster than campaign poop on an Obama iPhone.

    What happens to the other housing programs?

    There are already programs in place to help distressed homeowners. What happens to those with the bailout? Are we only helping the CEOs of Fannie and Fred, or are we dumping good money after bad on an already failed plan? Are the old programs, worth billions, folded in? Replaced? Thrown out?

    Port Clinton, Ohio has received $522,000 from CHIP, Community Housing Improvement Program. The limit, according to the website, is $500,000 but there's an extra $50,000 in there if you say please. According to The Beacon, Oct. 2, "The funds will be used to provide housing rehabilitation grants and loans to at least six homeowners and repairs for at least 9 owners . . ." plus some rental assistance, mortgage counseling, etc., and of course, it will pay the salaries of the folks managing this account--which is $25,000,000 just for Ohio. I wonder how you get to be one of the lucky six? If you can get this much under the mean old Republicans and that hateful President Bush, just imagine what the tooth tax fairy will bring under President Obama!! And you can get your unemployment benefits extended 2, 3 or 4 times under a Republican President, just imagine what it will be under Obama. You may never have to work again. Hope. Change. Just tax those top 5% more.

    But I digress. We're talking housing. Look how many people are employed by Ohio CHIP, just by the state--think how this will spread around and help in your county! I see the Planner job is open (on the chart)--I use to be one of those on JTPA. Great job [the title is meaningless].

    And what about the American Dream Downpayment Assistance Act--that was $200,000,000 a year under Bush. Will it flourish under the magic wand of Obama? And what about all those community partnerships we've been paying for?
      . . .the purposes of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 (NAHA), as amended, are: (1) to promote partnerships between States, units of general local government and nonprofit organizations, and (2) to expand nonprofit organizations' capacity to develop and manage decent and affordable housing. To assist in achieving these purposes, participating jurisdictions (PJs) under the HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Program must reserve not less than 15 percent of their HOME allocations for investment in housing to be developed, sponsored, or owned by Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs).
    Yes, HOME got in the bailout document. Just glancing through this HUD report I see we the people already had about $20,000,000 in place just to protect low income people from predatory lenders in 2001! Well, guys, how well did that work? Do we get more of this program that didn't work in the bailout?

    There are thousands of housing-help links to be tracked--there are a lot of different government agencies dabbling in this. That's why it is so critical to keep poor people poor. Thousands of government workers would be unemployed if this were ever successful! You'll have to do some of this research yourself. I have no horse in this race. But if you own distressed property in a bad neighborhood and you earn less than $60,000 a year, I'd say it would be worth checking the internet to see if you can find a way for me to pay for your repairs.

    The criminalization of HIV transmission

    The two lawyers who wrote about this in the August 6, 2008 JAMA are probably correct. Making it illegal to infect another person isn't going to save many lives and will probably discourage some from getting the care they need. For the most part, their article is about Africa, although their footnotes are from Europe and US. Even so, their recommendations are so pie-in-the-sky it makes you wonder. Except for the sex part, I think I was collecting U.S. government funded reports on this in the 1970s in the agriculture library. And then the goal was a bit smaller--better crops. (AIDS was in Africa at that time, but no one knew it.)
      address women's subordinate socioeconomic positions [mentioned several times in the article]

      improve women's status and offer serious protection of women's rights

      promote equal status of women in marriage, inheritance, access to credit, and employment

      address cultural issues such as dry sex and "wife inheritance"

      protect women from violence and ostracism

      those with HIV MUST PROTECT OTHERS [my emphasis]

      those jurisdictions which have criminalization laws in place must reverse them
    Maybe they should cut their teeth on global warming first, then work on completely changing the culture of Africa.

    "The case against criminalization of HIV transmission," by Scott Burris and Edwin Cameron. JAMA, August 6, 2008, Vol. 300, no. 5, pp. 578-581.

    Barney's ex-lover was director of Fannie Mae

    Barney Frank seems to have a wide stance problem with his ex's. One was running a male prostitute ring, one had access to inside information and influence that he shouldn't have. I don't know who the current squeeze is, but some sharp reporter ought to be checking him out for the next big story. Not that it would matter to Democrats. I don't expect this to change anyone's ideas of responsibility for the bailout. Whether it's about Bill Ayers and Barack Obama or Barney Frank and Herb Moses, it's always old, unimportant news to liberals.
      Now that Fannie Mae is at the epicenter of a financial meltdown that threatens the U.S. economy, some are raising new questions about Frank's relationship with Herb Moses, who was Fannie’s assistant director for product initiatives. Moses worked at the government-sponsored enterprise from 1991 to 1998, while Frank was on the House Banking Committee, which had jurisdiction over Fannie.

      Both Frank and Moses assured the Wall Street Journal in 1992 that they took pains to avoid any conflicts of interest. Critics, however, remain skeptical.

      "It’s absolutely a conflict," said Dan Gainor, vice president of the Business & Media Institute. "He was voting on Fannie Mae at a time when he was involved with a Fannie Mae executive. How is that not germane?

      "If this had been his ex-wife and he was Republican, I would bet every penny I have - or at least what’s not in the stock market - that this would be considered germane," added Gainor, a T. Boone Pickens Fellow. "But everybody wants to avoid it because he’s gay. It’s the quintessential double standard." Link

    Obama worship

    If you thought that video of little kids singing a hymn to Obama was bad, watch this video of young boys in paramilitary garb strutting and shouting Alpha-Omega and reciting different talking points of the Obama campaign, promising him their lives and careers. North Korean brainwashing anyone?

    And to think I was bothered by those Obama logos--the red white and blue sun with the road going nowhere--painted on collapsing Ohio barns. Obviously I hadn't looked far enough.

    Democrats for Life will have to buck their own President

    Moral leadership on this issue is important. Democrats are about to put a man in office who believes the outrageous abortion rate among black women is just another informed choice, a decision between a woman and her “health care provider.” This is a parent who would have his own daughters get an abortion if it weren’t a convenient time in their lives (or his career). This is a man who will shut down opposition to his views in the media. Does DFL really think Obama is going to buck feminists and the left on this notification issue? Feminists don’t want to save babies lives--even babies born alive, and neither do Team Obama and its obedient workers and followers! “. . . parental-involvement laws reduce the minor abortion rate by 13 to 31 percent when a state enacts laws to require parental consent or notification before a minor undergoes an abortion.” Story here.

    I’m on the mailing list for the Pregnancy Distress Center, and when the women’s reasons are listed they are often the boyfriend or her parents doing the pressuring to get an abortion--so what's the plan to reach them?

    Friday, October 03, 2008

    Thanks, Sarah

    For showing the world, particularly the hateful women on the left and the right, who denigrated everything about you, from your accent to your education to your baby son, that women can hold their own. If I could change one thing in the debate, it'd be that Johnnie-one-note "corruption and greed on Wall Street," as if that wasn't the stockholders on Main Street in the pensions, IRAs, 401-Ks, 403-Bs and private investments and annuities who were depending on their elected officials--the other 3 guys you're running with and against--for some oversight of the laws and regulations they themselves have put in place. We need an investigation of the Barney Franks of Congress--like yesterday!

    However, many people sold homes during the housing bubble and were thrilled that they were able to choose from bids offering thousands more than the asking price. Their "good fortune" was being fed by deregulation in the 90s, by CRA engineering the poor into bad home deals, by Congress taking money from Fannie and Fred in bipartisanship, by the push by banks to move low to moderate income people into homes they couldn't afford to meet their quotas. You can call it corruption and greed if you want, but some were just ordinary school teachers or business people from Dayton or Columbus, Ohio, taking advantage of a good return on their hard earned money as home prices doubled in a very short time. After the recovery from 9-11 with the Bush tax cuts, our investments soared, and we were enjoying the experience of having an imaginary "third person" in our home who just turned over his paycheck each month with no questions asked. We live on our pensions--hardly the rich fat cats that both the Obama-Biden and the McCain-Palin teams try to portray. When the bubble bursts, and they all do, greed has a different face, and it's never the one we see in the mirror. That imaginary tenant has packed his bags, hired a U-haul and left town.

    Well, Sarah, you're a winner in my book. I heard someone say that if you watched on TV you saw one debate, if you only listened, you heard something different, and if you read the debate, you'll get yet a third message. Well, there will be a fourth message, as the media snip and cut away at you. They are very hostile toward you. They are subjecting you to the Justice Thomas take down routine, but you seem to be putting on the full armor. We'll know the truth, regardless of how the MSM spins it, and it didn't come out of Joe Biden's mouth.

    We've heard this tune before

    I don't know about the neo-nazis I never read their stuff, but the far left anti-semitism is certainly on the rise, encouraged by the huge growth of the USA's Muslim population, which now exceeds the Jewish population. Yes, remember this from the 1930s? Or at least the history books we used to have--it's probably all been revised. It's all the fault of those "Jewish bankers." I tell you, folks, you're buying into a package here with Team Obama and his leftist handlers. The left can always find a reason to blame the Jews and especially our ally Israel.

    Store here.

    Thursday, October 02, 2008

    How people you didn't elect control everything you do

    This is just one. The Western Climate Initiative. There are many out there--mostly under the umbrella of global warming, which now includes health, safety, education, social engineering, and got its fair share of pork in the new bailout.
      The Western Climate Initiative would establish a regional market to trade carbon emissions credits, allowing industries that emit greenhouse gases to buy and sell credits for their emissions. The goal is to cut the region's carbon emissions to below 2005 levels by 2020, a roughly 15 percent reduction. [I read 25% by 2020.]

      The initiative, proposed Tuesday by seven western states and four Canadian provinces, covers more polluters than other regional plans adopted in the United States, Canada and Europe. [Yahoo News, AP story.] I would have copied from the WCI document, but couldn't--it's more scary in the "real" language.
    I think I see hundreds of these a week--architects, engineers and the building trades are wetting themselves, they are so eager to build green, and by that I don't mean environmental--I mean $$$$. If you see a really ugly building that looks like a box of blocks attached with velcro and tin foil, betcha it's "green."

    Cap and trade covers electricity, natural gas and heating fuels emissions as well as industrial emissions and transportation emissions. In short, just about everything that makes our world pleasant and easy and comfortable for us. It doesn't cover hot air by politicians and Al Gore.

    Faith Votes Columbus

    is funded by National Industrial Areas Foundation, a Chicago-based community organizing network established in 1940 by Saul Alinsky. IAF provides training and consultation, furnishes organizers, and develops national strategy for its affiliated broad-based community organizations [i.e., community organizers--like Jesus]. You can follow the interview of a Faith Votes worker who was picking up, taking to registration and telling homeless voters to vote for Barack Obama at this video. I think it is the third interview on the tape that shows the illegal behavior.

    Saul Alinsky was an American marxist who died in 1972. His son is proud that his father's handiwork footprint was so visible at the recent Democratic convention, and on Obama. Sen. Clinton was also one of his disciples. Clinton actually knew Alinsky; Obama did not--too young. He just taught from his marxist playbook being one of the best and brightest of those trained by the IAF--certainly light years ahead of the woman interviewed on this tape who needs to go back for a bit more training in how to talk to the press!

    We own Fannie and Fred, let's investigate

    "Now that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s failures have forced the federal government to put both into conservatorship — costing taxpayers some $200 billion — Americans, who now own the two entities, are entitled to know what role the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) played in creating this mess." Here.

    Will Nancy, Frank and Chris ever allow this? Barney Frank claims he didn't know his partner 20 years ago was running a gay sex ring out of Frank's home, and 2 years ago he stonewalled an investigation of Fannie. He's not going to get smarter, folks. Throw him out.

    "So why didn’t Congress do anything about these taxpayer-financed “bastions of privilege” sooner? Lest anyone ask questions about what they were up to, Fannie and Freddie also showered elected officials on Capitol Hill with campaign cash to keep their mouths shut and vociferously defend their accounting practices."

    Gwen Ifill needs to recuse herself

    The public's trust in the news media is maybe a few notches higher than Congress, but not much. Why the Commission on Presidential Debates needs someone selected from the news media is a mystery to me. They read and write text for a living--they are no better informed than a blogger from Ohio who reads and writes for fun, their faces and voices just are recognizable. Why not someone who doesn't make a living catering to politicians at the local, state and national level? It's OK for them to go out and explain weather to the kindergartners or cut ribbons at the opening of new nursing homes, but let's give them a night off during the debates. She has a serious conflict of interest, and McCain is a wimp for not objecting. There would be no reason for Obama to object--he knows the press is in his hip pocket wallet.

    PBS sure gets their shorts in a knot over someone else's perceived conflict of interest.

    Cheap gasoline and cheap tricks

    Here in Columbus gasoline is about $3.25. I realize in some cities you can't get it at any price. Never thought I'd say $3.25 was cheap, but that's down $1 from what it was on the peninsula this summer.

    Then those great old "community organizers" are rounding up the drunk and homeless to register to vote. Yes, Barack Obama has already started to steal Ohio--as of a few days ago you could register and vote on the same day, and boy were the Demmies ready for that one with a Democrat Attorney General and a court that seems to have lost all common sense. Not satisfied with a Democratic machine in Chicago--they've brought the goon squads here. The locals are outraged.
      "Election officials around Ohio were preparing for a rush of early voting Tuesday, the first day absentee ballots are accepted in advance of the Nov. 4 presidential election.

      Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, a Democrat, is also allowing new voters to register and cast an absentee ballot on the same day during a weeklong period that ends Oct. 6.

      For weeks, the Ohio Republican Party accused Brunner of interpreting the early voting law to benefit her own party by allowing same-day registering and voting. Republicans argued that Ohio law requires voters to have been registered for 30 days before they cast an absentee ballot.

      But the Republican-dominated Ohio Supreme Court decided Monday that Brunner was following the law. The decision was backed by a federal judge in Cleveland. Another federal judge in Columbus declined to rule, deferring to the state Supreme Court's decision." AOL News, Sept. 28
    One caller to a local station said it looked like a drunken rodeo with the "organizers" trying to chase down their transported prey in the parking lot and herd them into the building. Hmm. Sounds like Congress doesn't it?

    Student reporters interview registrants and "impartial" volunteers getting them to the polls. Here. One guy was for Obama for his "Thug Thizzle." Really, folks, it's pathetic, but no more so than the white, middle class voting for Obama to assuage their guilt for all their failed programs of the last 50 years and a past they had nothing to do with. Or because he is in Joe Biden's words, "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."

    Mortgage crisis sends illegals home

    It seems only the illegals knew our economy was robust during most of the Bush years. Certainly Democrats and particularly Barack Obama were clueless as was Kerry in 2004 when he declared it the worst economy since the Great Depression. Ten percent of Guatemala's population was living in the U.S. sending home $4.12 Billion in 2007--more than its exports of coffee, sugar and other commodities. All this from jobs Americans don't want? In that terrible Bush economy? Well, no wonder our household income was decreasing--it was going south!

    Miriam Jordan’s article , "Latest Immigration Wave, retreat" on the exodus of immigrant labor in today’s WSJ is careful not to use the word “illegal” or “undocumented” in the front page story. You need to get to paragraph 6 before that’s even hinted at. But it is slipped into the tiny print of the sub-headline and on page A16, you do find the headline has been readjusted by the truth meter: “In immigration’s latest wave, an illegal worker goes back home.”

    Her sob story teasers are then strip teased, little by little. For instance, Ambrosio Carrillo of Guatemala had to use his savings of $3,100 to get back home after construction work dried up. That’s early in the story. Then near the end, you find out it really only cost him about $300 for one-way fare--the rest went to ship his truck back home ($1,100), as well as a new TV, a DVD/VCR, a music system, and he gets home with $600 and his cell phone, where wages might be $10 a day.

    The talented Ms. Jordan, who has impressive street creds, can speak Spanish and writes sympathetically of illegals, also has wings, and flies right over Mexico during Carrillo’s dangerous and life threatening trip with a Coyote to Arizona, where he was picked up, taken to California and then flown to the east coast, all for $10,000, which must have been a horrible burden for his family. Mexico, in case you didn’t know, is not nice at all to central Americans found illegally in their country, even though Mexican authorities don’t mind if their own people travel north to work and send money home to bolster a corrupt government.

    Here are some of my favorite parts, with my comments and asides. I am not unsympathetic with Mr. Carrillo's plight, he's a hard worker and has become a small businessman since returning home--but American journalists, particularly those who write for WSJ, drive me up the wall with their leftist, pity-parties and op-ed front page rhetoric.
      "Once a construction worker earning about $15 an hour in Maryland, Mr. Carrillo barely worked in the fall of 2007 as plentiful jobs evaporated." What happened to that terrible pre-2007 Bush economy that was hurting middle class families?

      "Mr. Carrillo is helping to write the latest chapter in the American immigrant story." Switch to script writing, Ms. Jordan. Let's not get him confused with people who played by the rules.

      "In part, the slowdown is a product of a Bush administration crackdown on illegal immigration, with factory raids that led to deportations and even criminal charges for thousands of undocumented workers." Yes, let's blame Bush crackdowns, even though his own party wouldn't support him on amnesty and guest worker programs. He's one of the best buds the illegals ever had.

      "The fee charged by a coyote, or smuggler, was 42,000 Guatemalan quetzales, or about $5,700 -- including the overland journey from Guatemala to Mexico to Los Angeles and then a flight to Baltimore. Mr. Carrillo's family made a downpayment of about one-third of the tab before he set out. With interest, the total cost of the trip would double to nearly $10,000." Why no outrage at how a poor worker from another country (and obviously not that poor) was exploited in his own country, Ms. Jordan?

      "The Census Bureau reported last month that the income of U.S. households headed by non-citizen foreigners dropped 7.3% in 2007 from the previous year, after rising 4.1% in 2006. Pew Hispanic says that among households headed by Central Americans, the drop in income has been in the double digits." Let's keep in mind when Democrats describe the losses of income by "household," they aren't necessarily talking about Americans. The Census counts anyone who is here, even those illegals keeping wages depressed for African Americans.

      " "I started as a 'laborer,' making $9 an hour," says Mr. Carrillo, using one of the English words that leavened an interview otherwise conducted in Spanish. After tax and Social Security deductions, Mr. Carrillo says his take-home pay was about $400 a week, more than a dozen times what he earned back home. He bought a 1998 Nissan Sentra for $425." Although Ms. Jordan carefully notes he was learning English as he worked his way up to better jobs, she slips up here and says this was an English word he knew. But American fire, emergency, police and health care workers are severely chastised when they can't respond to 911 calls because they don't know Spanish!
    There's more. Obviously, the Democrats in Congress and the MSM have been lying to us about how awful the economy has been the last 7 years, and who was getting rich on the backs of working Americans. All so they can get their guy elected.

    Veep gaffes

    "In what has now become a disturbing pattern, the Alaska governor seems either unable or unwilling to avoid embarrassing statements that are often as untrue as they are outrageous. Recently, for example, in an exclusive interview with news anchor Katie Couric, Palin gushed, “When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the, you know, princes of greed. He said, ‘Look, here’s what happened.’ ” Apparently the former Alaskan beauty queen failed to realize that in 1929 there was neither widespread television nor was Franklin Roosevelt even President." Victor Davis Hanson on Sarah Biden.

    But in case you don't read Hanson's article closely and were planning to cut and paste, he is rewriting all of Joe Biden's gaffes into sweet Sarah satire.