2598 Can 500 experts be wrong?
Today's WSJ editorializes that 500 prominent economists claim that "immigration has been a net gain for American citizens."Guess what? In the 1830s and 1840s, U.S. economists and egg-heads believed that about slavery too! Yes indeedy. Slavery was absolutely an economic necessity in the rural South (they said then) and besides, white people were doing those poor pagans a big favor by bringing them to an enlightened country (while decimating their own culture and families).
I'm not worried about the 950,000 legal immigrants. We need them. But the illegals flooding in from Mexico? Is that good for the Mexican economy and culture to export their poor so they never have to address the inequalities in their system. And how about that drug trade that is part and parcel of the illegal immigration, and the one in 10 who are not Mexican, but come across that border into the U.S. Do you know how hard it is to immigrate to Mexico? Did you know you can't be President of Mexico if your mother was born in Spain even if you were born in Mexico? Did you know there are at least 4 classes of citizenship in Mexico, and guess who is at the bottom--the poorest and brownest (that's not the correct way to say it, but I like the alliteration). Well, no, the naturalized Mexican citizen would be at the bottom--especially if brown--not allowed to do many things.
But hey. Could 500 economists be wrong? Yes, about something other than the economy.
1 comment:
Well, it could be considered a net gain if you include all of the immigrants over time -- the ones who came from Europe through Ellis Island, struggled to learn English, and became AMERICANS.
But not if you just look at the Hispanic ghettos.
Post a Comment