Friday, August 19, 2005

1379 The neutrality of this article is disputed

Well, I should hope so! If it were any more biased in choice of words [invasion, officially-stated purpose, justified, fruitless missions, etc.] it would be on Moveon.org's site with Cindy Sheehan. And although I haven't read the details, I'm guessing the anti-Bush folks don't think this wikipedia article is anti-enough, and they are probably the ones disputing its neutrality.

No comments: