3758

Why I'm not voting for the library levy

SNP Publications

The Editorial in the April 25 UA News urged readers to 'keep the library at top of the class.' I don't plan to vote for the levy, although I use the library frequently and appreciate many of its good features, such as pleasant, helpful staff, digital genealogy sources, circulating magazines, and easy parking.

What I don't like is the response to concerns of the people the library serves. When parents came to them about the free-circ, sexually explicit journals and newspapers stacked in the entry way for pick-up by anyone coming or going, the library's response was to bring the material inside and build expensive shelving for protection of the distributors, not the children. No public library has a mission or responsibility to distribute free-circ material, which essentially is an advertising medium. And then there was that recent dust-up reported on TV because the librarian says she can’t block inappropriate material for minors at check out.

Money for the recently hired PR person could have been much better spent to upgrade the salaries of current staffers, or to add a librarian who would balance the lopsided collection or improve the catalog.

The library installed a very expensive drive-through drop off, destroying some nice green space and spending foolishly while Lane Road's plumbing rotted. I don't know if an in-house coffee shop is still being planned for Tremont Rd, but that idea definitely is poorly conceived.

The turn-key, on-line catalog is awkward and difficult to use, riddled with mistakes, and contains 2-3 hot links for each entry that go nowhere. The subject headings are inconsistent, and if there is keyword access (the easiest method), I haven't found it. The library web page is more attractive and helpful than what most libraries have, but could be much better.

The library regularly prints wall size posters in vivid colors and individual announcements on upcoming events and new acquisitions, using its supplies budget carelessly if the cost of my ink cartridges are any indication. The lyceum programs it sponsors duplicate many other activities and organizations in the community and Columbus. It increases the gate count, but not much else.

The current selection policies reflect the tastes of the staff--15 hard copies of Bob Woodward’s latest book, everything Michael Moore ever produced in every possible format, every anti-Bush administration book, 30 new cookbook titles always on the new bookshelves, a stunning collection of scrap booking titles, and a college-level collection on film, media and celebrities. I don’t know much about music, but 17 drawers of jazz CDs?

At Christmas, UAPL couldn’t even find a Christian title to include in its recommended nine new Christmas books published for a local magazine. Although Upper Arlington has three Lutheran churches, one of which is among the largest in the country, it has only 9 books on Lutherans, 2 of which are biographies of Martin Luther. There is more on Wicca and Wiccans than Lutherans in the UAPL collection. Methodists and Presbyterians don’t fare much better, and the Baptist title count is inflated only because of books--probably over 100--on Martin Luther King. There are probably more titles on the Amish than other Christian groups combined other than Catholics. The blatantly anti-Christian books, however, cover many shelves in the 300s and 900s. They are biased, hate filled, and political. You want to raise our taxes by $800,000 for that?

You say we UA folks are only paying 40% of the library’s operating budget? No sir, we’re paying ALL of it--just from different pots of taxes.

<------------------->

For other essays on UAPL where I site specific titles and subject headings, check here.