Saturday, April 28, 2007

3761

Unintended consequences of emissions control

In my opinion, the most sensible gas saving regulation ever to go into effect was the 55 mph speed limit back in the 1970s. I'm sure it cut into someone's profits, but overnight it saved many lives--thousands a year--and miraculously, it seems to cut down on travel time because there were far fewer accidents holding you up on the roadways and interstates. One benefit never measured was that on the cardiovascular system of the drivers and passengers who weren't driving at 75 mph in a moving parking lot with their heart in their throats.

Now there are hearings for new regulations on emissions control of heavy trucks, which really are the life blood of this country. Virtually everything we eat, or wear or use one square of each time we go to the rest room, is shipped by truck.

Stricter emissions:

    Worse mileage will mean more fuel. 1 mile less per gallon

    Worse road conditions for other vehicles. Longer, heavier trucks will need to make up the added costs for everything moved by truck, tearing up our asphalt and concrete, causing more fatal accidents when we hit them.

    More unsafe trucks. Current trucks will be kept in service longer because they will not be covered by the new regulations.

    Hotter trucks. Engines need to burn at a higher heat with the new standards.

    Reduced competition. New standards hurt independents and small truckers, and some will go out of business.

    Stockpiles. Larger companies have stockpiled new trucks built before the new standards, raising costs for independents.


Add to this the cost of gasoline blends we're going to be forced to burn in our cars, and we're going to have a huge increase in food prices, hurting the poor who spend a larger percentage of their dollar on food.

I like clean air as much as the next gal, but green air costs you the green.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I recall a whimsical suggestion from years ago : higher mileage cars could go faster because they were not contributing unfairly to the consumption problem.
Another nice one related to the march of progress and pollution controls. Reducing diesel particulate emissions did, in fact, require running motors hotter. The compounds resulting from this increased 'heat of formation' are reduced in mass - and vastly increased in
carcinogenic toxicity. Oops !