Tuesday, October 05, 2010

The Kirwin Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity

I've been looking through the programming, publications and propaganda put out by the Kirwin Institute here at Ohio State University in Columbus and find nothing but hopelessness, divisiveness, anger, and hatred. Why are we employing people to constantly be stirring the pot? Were there not enough academics in the Black Studies, Women Studies, Social Work, Public Health, etc. departments to do this? I read one heart breaking piece on the black women, forgotten, being pulled out of the Anthony Sowell property in Cleveland a year ago. No mention that the killer was a black man--just condemnation of a racist society that cares so little when a black woman disappears. No mention that a few had never been reported missing by their families.


Some samples, just in case anything were resolved, to continue the employment of the staff:

    Social justice issues are never static and new challenges and issues are constantly emerging [so we can keep our grant money flowing?].

    In addition to our core research areas, the Institute has several emerging research initiatives that are responsive to new issues that have profound impacts on racial and ethnic groups. . . Our work operates on the premise that opportunities exist in a complex web of interdependent factors, and that to alleviate inequities in any single area, we must first consider the entire structure that supports these inequities. [We're on a roll--let's see how far we can go with this web!]

    Inequality has a geographic footprint. We have pioneered the use of maps to communicate the history and presence of discriminatory and exclusionary policies that spatially segregate people [Let's draw in academics from geography and urban planning.]

You get the idea. This is a funding scheme that will never end.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

About that mapping:

"They were then able to overlay that data with housing and foreclosure rates. After the information was revealed, they have unveiled programs like "Adopt a Zipcode" (to target donations to legal aid groups for communities in need), a state level program design (which brought $5 million in new affordable housing in higher opportunity areas) and added 21 million in "neighborhood stabilization funds" to increase opportunities in these neighborhoods. This was all put into motion in the 18 months after the report and maps were published."

More money ($26 mil) so there can be more foreclosures for "opportunity areas?"