Wednesday, October 17, 2012

The Benghazi cover up and why

Why did the White House persist with the phony story of a protest against a video being the cause of Ambassador Stevens' death, when they had to know there was no protest?

The most plausible explanation is that the truth -- we were being hit with the worst terror attack since 9/11 in a city we saved -- would have exposed Obama's boasting about his Libya triumph and al-Qaida being "on the run" and "on the path to defeat" as absurd propaganda.

Al-Qaida is now in Libya, Mali, Yemen, Syria, Iraq and Pakistan.

And the epidemic of anti-American riots across the Muslim world, with Arab Spring elections bringing to power Islamist regimes, testify to the real truth. After four years of Obama, it is America that is on the run in the Middle East.

But we can't let folks find that out until after Nov. 6.

Hence the Benghazi cover-up.

Read full essay with time line here.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Murray sez:
By golly Norma, I think you got it!

What say you Liberals?

Norma said...

Notice the link. This is from Pat Buchanan. But thanks, I think I said this a few blogs back. If Obama admitted up front the truth, he'd be faced with everyone knowing he's failed in the Middle East.