Tuesday, March 13, 2007

3577

It's naughty to be not nice

DePauw University (Greencastle, IN) has pulled its approval from the Delta Zeta sorority. It seems that 23 of the sisters were asked to take "alumna status" and leave the house because they failed to meet recruiting goals. DZ National's story. The sisters claimed it was because they weren't pretty enough. The photo in the USAToday shows some not unattractive, 20-something ladies with too much mascara and some extra poundage.

Sororities, cliques or social clubs for women (or men) whether in high school, college, or real life aren't designed to include everyone. Their very existence says, "we are somebody," and you aren't. Why is it worse to exclude a woman because she is not attractive than because she isn't a good athlete or a good student? Will black sororities be required to include whites? Will Jewish sororities have to rush Bahai's? Do engineering fraternities have to include thespians?

All 23 of those women when they went through "rush" knew they got in because someone else didn't. They knew that with the next class, they'd be the ones excluding another young woman whose grades would bring the average down, or she drank too much and embarrassed them, or her table manners were poor, or . . . she was homely. Is prettiness more superficial than bad manners or poor grades? I disliked the Greek system from the get-go, and never participated when I was in college. I lived in an independent dorm and loved it. It was the judging and exclusion stuff I disliked. But this is childish! Talk about "in loco parentis!"

Ladies, it's a big bad world out there. Deal with it. Don't be a victim. Don't join the Greek system and then whine about exclusionary behavior like this is all new to you and you just had no idea what was going on.

4 comments:

Cathy said...

I feel the same way as you about sororities and fraternities. I did not participate in them either.

Unknown said...

Um, reality check here ... The smaller chapters often don't make quota, so it's not a matter of people "getting in because somebody else didn't." They have more openings than people anyhow. Problem is that such chapters are sometimes not very well-treated.

Norma said...

Wayward--that may be true at the local level on small campuses like DePauw, but the concept of exclusion is still pervasive in the system, and they signed on for that. If they "didn't make quota" then the original reason given for the "alumna status" makes more sense than not being attractive enough, and the school administration still should have bowed out.

Joan said...

Well-said, Norma. I have always found it interesting that the adjective "exclusive" is regarded as a positive description. Most people seem happy to be "exclusive" they just don't want to be "excluded."