Bill and Barry disagree on banking
Barack Obama's tale is pretty fishy. It's not the way Bill Clinton remembers it."In BusinessWeek.com, Maria Bartiromo reports that she asked the former President last week whether he regretted signing that [1999] legislation. Mr. Clinton's reply: "No, because it wasn't a complete deregulation at all. We still have heavy regulations and insurance on bank deposits, requirements on banks for capital and for disclosure. I thought at the time that it might lead to more stable investments and a reduced pressure on Wall Street to produce quarterly profits that were always bigger than the previous quarter.
"But I have really thought about this a lot. I don't see that signing that bill had anything to do with the current crisis. Indeed, one of the things that has helped stabilize the current situation as much as it has is the purchase of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America, which was much smoother than it would have been if I hadn't signed that bill. . .
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act passed the Senate on a 90-8 vote, including 38 Democrats and such notable Obama supporters as Chuck Schumer, John Kerry, Chris Dodd, John Edwards, Dick Durbin, Tom Daschle -- oh, and Joe Biden. Mr. Schumer was especially fulsome in his endorsement."
Story here.
4 comments:
Or, conversely, Bill is lying to protect his image. He's been known to do that before, and I think he's still seriously PO'd that Obama got the nomination and not his wife. LOL, I really don't consider him a credible source.
LOL, you've got a point. He'd like Obama to look bad and lose so Hillary can win (or run) in 2012. However, he has been known to tell the truth, and Obama, hmmm, not so much. This one is easy to check. There are records unlike most of Obama's fantastic tales of hope, change and audacity.
And.. just one more.. I promise. I don't think know I've ever seen the WSJ op-ed page actually tell someone to listen to Bill. Whats wrong with that picture?
You're wrong on that. On the op-ed page, lefties are always around. I think Al Gore had an article this week. The actual staff editorials are conservative and pro-business. On the news pages, WSJ is more liberal than NYT and always full of social engineering.
Post a Comment