Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Marxism, a refresher

All history, according to marxism (named for Karl Marx 1818-1883) is a struggle between the exploiter (in modern times, the capitalist) and the exploited (the worker). The struggle will only cease when capitalism is destroyed and a classless society exists. The golden age arrives when private property, marriage, nationality, and religions are abolished. Religion is a tool of the oppressor, as are conventional or traditional ethics and idealism (including humanism and liberalism). High on the list of marxist ideals are concern for public health, a sense of public duty (even if it has to be required), mutual respect, moral purity, modesty, brotherhood above family, race and class, and a solidarity with working people everywhere. Fraternity with capitalists, of course, is excluded from these principles, and class hatred is permitted for the cause of assuring justice. For Christians, this is most clear in Liberation Theology and Black Liberation Theology, both of which have made great inroads in both conservative and liberal Christian groups, who have become impatient to "bring in the Kingdom" while expelling God and replacing him with "the poor."
    Beginning in Latin America, Liberation Theology is based on the belief that the Christian Gospel demands "a preferential option for the poor," and that the church should be involved in the struggle for economic and political justice in the contemporary world—particularly in the Third World. Dating to the Second Vatican Council (1962-65) and the Second Latin American Bishops Conference, held in Medellin, Colombia (1968), the movement brought poor people together in Christian-based communities, to study the Bible and to fight for social justice. However, since the 1980s, the church hierarchy has criticized liberation theology and its advocates, accusing them of wrongly supporting violent revolution and Marxist class struggle” (Columbia University Encyclopedia 2004).

    Black Theology developed alongside Latin Liberation Theology and had its roots in the Civil Rights and the Black Power movements of the 1960s. In the process, many “black ministers consciously separated their understanding of the gospel of Jesus from white Christianity and identified it with the struggles of the black poor for justice.” Rev. Wright correctly credits two books written by James Cone, “Black Theology and Black Power” in 1969 and “A Black Theology of Liberation” in 1970, that made liberation the organizing centre of his theological system and subsequently of many Black churches.While Latin Liberation Theology was concerned with classism and Black Theology was concerned with racism, both held a common concern for the poor (Westminster Dictionary of Christian Theology 1984). Orthodoxy Today
Liberalism used to mean free from restraint, particularly from a system, like the church or a federal or national government. It eventually came to promote the interests of the middle class which included helping the disadvantaged and minorities, non-violence and environmentalism because in the long run, liberals would benefit. In past years, liberals and marxists were hand shaking enemies because marxists can't tolerate personal freedom. But liberals were much more hostile toward conservatives who see justice as a moral code existing outside their own vested interests (usually but not always, God), so increasingly liberals in the USA have assisted and promoted and been swallowed up by the marxists.

Barack Hussein Obama is not a Muslim, he is a Christian and a marxist as illustrated above--they are not necessarily incompatible. If your "Christian" label pre-dates Liberation Theology, you'll just have to adjust. Get over it. But whatever label you give him, he hates capitalism, which means he is not good for America and your 401-K or your annuities or your health plan (or Europe, or the struggling Third World economies, for that matter). This is clear in the way he has taken advantage of the huge meltdown of capitalism in the past month, almost prematurely dancing on its grave, while rushing in with the claim that he will save us from the jaws of death. He is funded and backed by notorious criminals both here and abroad, progressives and marxists who go by a variety of names--like George Soros, Moveon.org, Hate America First, Daily Kos Kids, and ACORN who are about to dismantle our right to vote, and then will go after our freedom of information. I would add the feminists in that marxist crowd, except they're the only ones who are true to their team and have stayed poor--they haven't been much use to him except to make the coffee like the good old days of the 60s.

4 comments:

R. L. said...

LOL.. you still just don't get it do you?

If he hates capitalism so much, why on earth would he propose that capital gains taxes not be levied against small businesses and start-ups? Please, don't let facts get in your way.

Obama doesn't hate marriage, which you list as an element of Marxism. He's married. And seems quite happy to be married.

Public health, modesty, mutual respect, moral purity, are not elements of Marxism. In fact, those are all elements generally associated with Victorian England. Not Marxism. The last two elements you mentioned are in SOME Marxist thinking, but certainly not all. However, I've seen nothing that Obama has said or done that would lead anyone to believe in brotherhood uber alles, or in promoting the solidarity of the working classes throughout the world.

I don't know what to tell you Norma, but your understanding of Marxism is deeply flawed and driven by your ideology rather than any attempt to really understand Marxism. LOL, I keep talking in circles, so I think I'll stop. I'll keep visiting, 'cause it's like a train wreck. I just can't help but watch.

You are right about one thing. I need my own blog. I started one, I just need to keep up on it.

One suggestion... take some time to actually study Marxism and other forms of Socialism. You'll be surprised at the differences. Just as not all capitalists are alike, not all socialists are alike. In fact, most socialists see some usefulness in the free market. They just don't see it as the holy grail of human economic life.

Norma said...

Get a grip RL. Marriage is useful to him as is religion and all the other perks--for now. You are the reason he's so successful. Open mind, drive garbage truck through. I didn't set out to write a thesis on marxism--this was intended to be a refresher. You, apparently, never got 101. Where did I say those elements of marxism didn't share something with other ideologies. Please, don't play the fool. I didn't say he was a socialist, nor did I say there aren't elements of capitalism in his plan. China has it, too. Its planned economy was failing--they had to throw a few bones. THINK, Real Lefty. B-I-G P-I-C-T-U-R-E. Don't drown yourself in footnotes and details.

LOL = Little Old Lady? You?

R. L. said...

No, you said they are marxist ideals. You didn't say they were ideals for anyone else. I can't help it if your writing/thinking is fuzzy.

If they are ideals across the board, then they really aren't marxist ideals are they? Since other political systems share them as well, they are proof of nothing. Unless, of course, Conservatives are all for digging up sewers. I mean, really, how marxist can you get? Lets go back to dumping raw sewage into the streets. Everyone who flushes a toilet is a marxist!

Yes.. BIG PICTURE. I get it. So big that facts are just annoying details. It's better not to have to deal with them at all, since they only get in the way. No, really Norma, I understand. Obama is a marxist because you say so. Big picture.

By the way, I'm pretty sure that McCain is a monarchist. I don't have any proof, but then facts aren't important. They're just details to drown in.

Anonymous said...

"The political and economic philosophy of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in which the concept of class struggle plays a central role in understanding society's allegedly inevitable development from bourgeois oppression under capitalism to a socialist and ultimately classless society."Answers.com

Seems pretty clear to me. What part of class struggle does RL not understand?