Thursday, March 01, 2012

The Joseph Ellis fabrication of George Washington

Why Time Magazine would use a liar and known character assassin to write about George Washington for a special edition, I don't know. . . Oh, wait, I think I do. Because Washinton stood for something. Have you checked his piece for original sources? Ellis was exposed 8 years ago as a fraud. What's up at Time? When he tried to trash Thomas Jefferson with the Hemings story in the 1990s, he was trying to shore up William Jefferson Clinton, as "see everyone does it." With Washington, I think he's trying to discredit all patriots, and shore up President Obama. Mt. Holyoke suspended him for a year. It was far too little. I have the pb edition of his "Founding Brothers" (written before his lies were exposed), so it will go in the trash, not even to the library book sale where it might mislead someone for fifty cents.

". . . consider how intellectually disabled a generation of students mentored by Mount Holyoke "presidential historian" Joseph Ellis must be, given his assertion in Time Magazine this week that "[Washington] began the political tradition that produced a Union victory in the Civil War, the Federal Reserve Board, Social Security, Medicare, and most recently, Obamacare. He had no patience in his own time with a states' rights interpretation of the Constitution and would have found the conservative agenda of the modern Republican Party and its Tea Party allies a repudiation of all he stood for."

Of course, Time's editors failed to issue a disclaimer noting that their esteemed source is a fraud and fabricator. In 2001, the Boston Globe revealed that Ellis had been telling his spellbound young students tall tales of his involvement in the civil rights movement in the South, of his valor as a combat platoon leader in Vietnam, and of his later activities as an intrepid anti-war leader at Yale. All lies."

    "For years, Mount Holyoke professor Joseph Ellis had been regaling students, interviewers, and friends with gripping stories of his service in Vietnam. He claimed to have been a platoon leader and paratrooper with the 101st Airborne Division. He said he served in Saigon under Gen. William Westmoreland.

    Ellis was recently forced to apologize for "having let stand" the "assumption" that he served in Vietnam. Ellis whiled away the Vietnam War in his college dorm room, presumably, like most academics, smoking pot, and listening to the Beatles' "White Album."

    Among the "assumptions" Ellis had "let stand" was his claim that after witnessing the horror of Vietnam, he came home and enlisted in the anti-war movement. He also boasted of having helped David Halberstam with his 1972 best seller, The Best and the Brightest, by sharing his vivid recollections of Vietnam.

    He had no involvement in the anti-war movement, and Halberstam says he's never talked to Ellis.

    The fantasy life of this deskbound Walter Mitty didn't stop at Vietnam. He has also bragged about his work in the civil-rights movement. He claims that while on the Freedom Trail in Mississippi, he was the victim of racist Southern cops banging on his door late at night and following him in his car. He wistfully recalled his years as a high-school football star, describing to a reporter last year how he once scored the winning touchdown.

    He wasn't in Mississippi, and his greatest moment on the football field involved a clarinet.

    Between 'Nam flashbacks and Freedom Rider reunions, Ellis co-authored the groundbreaking 1998 report, "Jefferson Fathered Slave's Last Child." You may remember this report if you weren't on the moon when it was released. It was the Clinton flacks' giddiest "Gotcha!" moment. The report was unveiled to instant acclaim — as luck would have it — just weeks before the House impeachment vote.

    Bill Clinton wasn't a pervert, liar, and felon after all! Rather, he was part of an honorable history of venerable men molesting the help. As report co-author Ellis put it: "It is as if Clinton had called one of the most respected character witnesses in all of U.S. history to testify that the primal urge has a most distinguished presidential pedigree." Ellis claimed the new testing proved "beyond any reasonable doubt that Jefferson had a long-term sexual relationship with his mulatto slave."

    As the author of the award-winning American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson — and a Vietnam veteran — Ellis spoke with some authority on the matter. He dismissed the likely protestations from "die-hard Jefferson worshippers," proclaiming the debate over. "Now we know," he said.

    Unfortunately, proof of a Jefferson-Hemings liaison was as fanciful as Professor Ellis's war service. Two months after the report's "findings" had been published in every news outlet where English is spoken, there was a slight correction. One of Ellis' co-authors, pathologist Eugene Foster, admitted to the British science journal Nature that they had not proved Thomas Jefferson fathered any children by Sally Hemings. What they meant to say was "Jefferson could have fathered the slave's last child." Just like Ellis could have served in Vietnam.

    The scientists had compared the DNA from descendants of Hemings's last son to the DNA of descendants of one of Jefferson's paternal uncles. The report established only that some Jefferson male had fathered a child with Hemings.

    That isn't as incriminating as it might sound. There were 25 Jefferson males with the same DNA alive when Hemings conceived her last son. Seven of them were at Monticello during the relevant time period. The report's title was a lie." Link

"I believe that the lies he told about himself and the way he told them changed the way he wrote history," Charles Hoffer wrote of Joseph Ellis.

Hoffer is kinder than I would be. Ellis is was and always will be a liar, and any school or publication that hires him to write or teach history is not worthy of my money or time.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well written - thanks for posting. I was just watching the same discussion on GBTV.

I have not read the TIME "special" myself. So far, based on what I just saw and heard on GBTV, I'm in no rush to go out and pick up a copy. Apparently, Ellis didn't include even one footnote citing any quotes or references to support his wild assertions.

In my opinion, Ellis and TIME have no credibility. All revisionist historians and the institutions that harbor and promote them need to be exposed for the liars and, dare I say, criminal accomplices that they are.

Wake up, America!

Three Score and Ten or more said...

I subscribed to Time for almost thirty years. Now (and for the past ten years) I occasionally read it in the Doctor's waiting room, an appropriate place to read well written fiction.

Anonymous said...

Ellis and Time belong together as neither have any credibility; therefore not worth reading! EVER!

President Carter enacted the Dept of Education & this experiment has failed everyone & needs to be closed & sent back to the States, yesterday.

And folks this is just one example of what's wrong with the educational system - try multiplying this by thousands of bad teachers.

Cos

Anonymous said...

very well said........i live in the next town over from joe ellis and i must say, alot of local folks were equally upset, angered by the fraud he has concocted over the years on these students he has taught...when you stand up and describe involvement in history, that you allege being a part of, first hand account, people perk up and listen more, thats my take anyway, but to fabricate a first hand account in so many ways almost indicates a mental issue, or some kind of ego problem...just the same he was exposed by the globe and at first the college tried in vain to smother it, but as the truth is, it became revealed, and the school was blasted to say the least, she (head of mt. holyoke) had no choice but to remove him, for a year i think. he made no apology to the local vietnam veterans chapter or any vets, said he only owed his school and students an explanation....what a disservice this guy did...............this was reported in many local news outlets and I am sure, the school's phone was ringing off the hook from former faculty, students, grads and the money holders.........his credibility is shot to say the least........good article.