Tuesday, May 10, 2016

This is how much Obama cares about children

                   Image result for bathroom wars

North Carolina's children's education just took a backseat to the LGBT agenda. Loretta Lynch and Barack Obama are threatening the state with government money withdrawal for education.  Perhaps you don't understand that changing the law is a decision for Congress, and that for 20 years the LGBT lobby has failed to do this.  Never mind.  Here comes the President, who can't put boots on the ground in Syria for fear of the Muslims, but can put men's butts in women's restrooms in our country to poke you in the eye.  What a brave man; who cares about the women and children. Remember in 2008 he was all for traditional marriage.  Then in 2012, the LGBT really went after him for his reelection and all of a sudden the dam broke. Now we not only have same sex marriage, we have business people being sued who don't want to participate, we have men being invited to use women's locker rooms and bathrooms and churches will be next. But it won't stop here; a P will be added to the acronym because why should age matter if nothing else does?
"Title VII prohibits private and public employers (including state governments) from discriminating on the basis of “race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.” Title IX prohibits federally funded educational institutions from discriminating on the basis of “sex.” Neither statute prohibits sexual-orientation or gender-identity discrimination. For more than 20 years, LGBT activists have sought to amend federal law through the so-called Employment Non-Discrimination Act, a bill that would essentially add sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes within federal nondiscrimination law. For more than 20 years, LGBT activists have failed. ENDA hasn’t passed even when Democrats controlled the presidency and both houses of Congress."
http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/2016/05/the-reckless-and-ruthless-bullying-of.html

1 comment:

Paula said...

I thought you meant age as in elder discrimination and couldn't find it in your quote. I thought employers couldn't discriminate based on age? Maybe that's in another statute. In any case, it took me another minute to figure out what you meant by P. That seems crazy, but this whole thing is so insane, that who even knows what will happen next. Kids can't read or do math, but let's hold up money because of the bathrooms. Maybe we should all return to doing our biz in the bushes, like bears.