Sunday, October 19, 2008

A U.S. citizen should be able to:

If the citizens were more knowledgeable on these seven points, we'd have fewer problems and misunderstandings during the Christmas seasons, fewer misinformed school officials and better collections in our public libraries.
    1. Explain the position that religious liberty is a universal human right, the preservation of which depends upon a reciprocal responsibility to respect that right for everyone.

    2. Explain how the constitutional principles of religious liberty are the ground rules that enable people of all faiths and none to live together as citizens of one nation.

    3. Explain the principles of religious liberty or freedom of conscience as found in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

    4.Explain various interpretations of the constitutional relationship of religion and government in American political life.

    5. Explain the significant role religion and religious belief have played in American history and politics.

    6. Explain the relationship of religious liberty to the strength and diversity of religious life in the United States.

    7.Take, defend, and evaluate positions on constitutional issues regarding religious beliefs and practices.

    Finding Common Ground; a First Amendment Guide to Religion and Public Education, on-line edition, “Appendix B, “A history of religious liberty in American public life.” The on-line edition has more material than the print edition, 1997, as well as an article from 2007 by the editor, Charles C. Haynes of the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt.

Hilltop Lutheran

Although I’ve expressed some concern about our church’s relationship with the federal government through faith based initiatives, I have no reservations about our unordained (non-ordained?) pastor at Hilltop Lutheran and navigating around the rules of ELCA. He has a heart for Jesus and the people living in the neighborhood. Hilltop Lutheran serves a "transitional" community which 50 years ago was thriving and middle-class. Most of its members had moved to the suburbs. It became part of Upper Arlington Lutheran Church six years ago.
    Hilltop‘s unorthodox mix also includes an unordained spiritual leader, Steve Scott, 51, a former lawyer. In the 70s, he worked with Young Life, an urban ministry for high-school students. He began preaching at the church two years ago and became its minister in November because of a "compelling sense that it‘s the right thing to do," he said. He can‘t perform marriages but can do most other pastoral duties. Full story in the Columbus Dispatch

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Another one who escaped

Obama's fairness doctrine

The damage of Obama's slip up in talking to Joe the Plumber, and why the press is trying to take your eye off Obama and focus on an ordinary citizen working for a living for a plumbing company in Ohio, is that even the most undecided voter knows that "spread the wealth around" is socialism.

For some reason, the voters haven't caught on to the lie, "95% will have their taxes reduced." These are the same people who don't realize credit means debt and sale means spend. In this parable he's talking about reinstating welfare for millions; millions of people don't pay taxes, so they will get a tax credit, i.e., will be paid for not paying taxes. McCain has been really weak in demolishing this phony claim.

Also, voters don't seem to remember one of the most successful features during the Clinton years was the Congress forcing his hand on welfare reform. Oh! the Democrats moaned and groaned, they predicted horrible things, but the economy soared by putting people to work. And Clinton got the credit--about his only positive legacy. The "community organizations" immediately went right to work pushing the newly employed or low income into NINJA loans so they would have something to do when they took their clutches off the necks of the poor.

Also, voters in 2008 don't remember the promises Bill Clinton made about reducing taxes on the middle class during his campaign in 1992 (I voted for him, did you?)--took about a month when he told us that he really couldn't do that--we'd all have to pay more. Maybe McCain is too much of a gentleman to bring it up, but he could turn that one over to Sarah.

Someone, and I don't care if it is Governor Palin or Senator McCain, needs to tell the voters that when Obama hits up the rich for more taxes (because "it's fair" or "patriotic"), he is simply penalizing the investors. The truly rich will still hire the accountants and lawyers and buy their boats, houses, and travel, but there will be much less left to invest. I saw some figures on how much Cindy McCain has lost recently. You're not sorry? I am. That's money that won't create jobs. (And she won't pay taxes on her losses, remember, so we're hurt two ways). So tax rate for the top 10% goes up, but Joe the Plumber or Jane the Pharmaceutical rep may be 100% out of a job. Jobs are created by the rich, not the poor.

Bush certainly hasn't been frugal. He's thrown money at education like he was a drunken Democrat from Massachusetts instead of a recovering Republican from Texas. He's infuriated conservatives. But he knows the way to bring in more money is to reduce the tax rates--that really spreads the wealth. Our nation's unemployment was under 5% for most of the Bush years because of his tax cuts. And before the housing meltdown caused by Democrats failing to rein in Fannie and Fred, the market was at an all time high. Obama doesn't care. He wants your job--as long as some rich investor gets taxed more. If you are 100% unemployed, well good, it just gives him more opportunity to make you more dependent on him. Makes him feel good--or powerful--or both.

The Team Obama's treatment of Joe the Plumber is just a foretaste of what's to come.

McCain supporter attacked by Obamatite

Although the press reported some mean language at a McCain rally and the MSM was all over it, the Secret Service and police and people attending never heard or saw a thing. However, according to Pajamas Media, an irate Obama supporter attacked a McCain supporter holding a poster causing injuries and a police report. "The overly formal document doesn’t mention this important detail: the victim was a small, quiet, middle-aged woman wearing glasses, and the attacker was a loud, angry man who went into orbit at the mere sight of McCain campaign signs." Get a grip, folks. It's just our future. I don't watch the NBCBSABC news much. Have they been as good at tracking down this guy's license to assault, tax records, voter registration and divorce papers as they were with Joe the Plumber?

John the Plumber, not Joe

is making robocalls in Ohio according to Maggie Thurber, a radio talk show host in Lucas County keeping an eye on local, state and national politics. When you check the caller ID number, you get recorded B.O. I still think they're mad that Joe the Plumber was more articulate than Barack the Candidate.

The Junior Senator from Illinois on the issues

was elected on 11/02/2004, and began service in 2005. He immediately began to run for President. I looked at Project Vote Smart I browsed through a few topics that interest me--abortion, agriculture, commerce, environmentalism, but you may want to check others.

Prohibiting the Funds in S 1200 from Being Used for Abortions--Senator Obama did not vote. I think he does this a lot--sort of his political footprint--tries to make it small. However,
    NARAL, Planned Parenthood, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association give him a score of 100. National Right to Life Committee and Illinois Federation for Right to Life give him a zero.
Americans for Tax Reform which believes in a system in which taxes are simpler, fairer, flatter, more visible, and lower gave him a zero in 2005 and a 5-15 in 2007 as he was moving closer to his goal of being the party’s choice (they gave McCain a 70). Citizens for Tax Justice which wants higher taxes for the wealthy and the closing of corporate loop holes, gave him 100 (they gave McCain a 50). National Taxpayers Union, which "Seeks to reduce government spending, cut taxes, and protect the rights of taxpayers." gave him an F, or a 6 (gave McCain a 78).

National Association of Government Contractors gave him a score of 100 (McCain a zero) as did the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association (this endorsement begs for a comment about Chicago type justice, doesn’t it?) which gave McCain a 33. U.S. Chamber of Commerce which promotes human progress through an economic, political and social system based on individual freedom, incentive, initiative, opportunity, and responsibility gave him a 33 and McCain a 100.

The Arab and Iranian interest groups are very savvy; they gave both candidates almost identical scores--very high. The NAACP have Obama 100 and McCain a 5--they will just never forgive him for not voting for the day off for MLK day, no matter how much he grovels.

Club for Growth gives Obama a 33 and McCain a 100; Americans for Prosperity give Obama 42.9 and McCain 100; John Birch Index gives Obama 18, McCain a 38. American Wind Energy Association and League of Conservation Voters give Obama 100 and American Land Rights gives him an 11.

I realize McCain is older, more experienced and has been reelected often, however, when the two pages (bio/resume) are compared side by side, the differences are stunning. The item on BO's very short resume you need to notice is The Woods Fund of Chicago, which sort of bundles all the funding and scary friends together in a neat package.

What happened to the $160 million Annenberg challenge?

Through Bill Ayers, Obama got a piece and had the opportunity to “spread the good(s)” in the 90s and launch his career in politics. Peggy Noonan doesn't get it. Do You? Do you really want Democrats controlling all three branches of the government with their Just-Us radical, anti-American social plans?
    “[Bill Ayers‘] hatred of America is as virulent as when he planted a bomb at the Pentagon. And this hatred informs his educational "reform" efforts. Of course, Mr. Obama isn't going to appoint him to run the education department. But the media mainstreaming of a figure like Mr. Ayers could have terrible consequences for the country's politics and public schools.”
Ayers is no education reformer

High noon for Noonan

It's too bad that print readers won't see the comments conservatives have sent to the WSJ about Peggy Noonan, who has been suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome for years, ever since she was left at the altar--wasn't even invited to be a bridesmaid after being a big wheel in the party. Now she's really shaming herself with tantrums about Palin. Readers aren't buying it. I sent a comment, but I'm no match for the pros. They're all pretty good, but this was one of my favorites.
    Ms. Noonan writes, "In the end the Palin candidacy is a symptom and expression of a new vulgarization in American politics."

    And here's what the press had to say about the Gettysburg Address, back in 1863: "The cheek of every American must tingle with shame as he reads the silly, flat and dishwatery utterances of the man who has to be pointed out to intelligent foreigners as the President of the United States."

Voter fraud in Ohio

Here in Ohio we’re experiencing massive voter fraud. The Obamanation has so much money and so many volunteers we are being overwhelmed. Check out the Palestra blog for a story on "Mr. Smith," from Florida who had been living in Ohio 2 days (working for the Democrats, living with a host family) and registered and voted during our "golden" week.

A commenter explains why ACORN submits hordes of duplicate and obviously false names on voter registration forms.
    The obvious phony voter registrations keep the election boards tied up trying to locate the obvious ones. The new voters with actual verifiable addresses are over looked in this process. In the mean time these organizations have rented houses in various voting districts so dozens of out of state and fraudulent voters have a local address to use for the actual voter fraud. Usually these places are dumps unfit for human habitation so the rent is cheap. With millions of dollars backing them and the stakes of putting their man in the White House, how many of these mail drops can they afford? It's almost unlimited. Once they show up and vote at the polls that vote can no longer be traced.
I know well the passion and idealism of the Democrats, young and old, student and retiree. I'm sure they see what they are doing--destroying our country through the ballot--as honorable and just. But they're just wrong.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Obama and ACORN

We know personally how much noise an acorn can make. We lived for 34 years in a house with a metal roof with a huge oak tree overhanging it.
    "A common thread in many of the cases that [John] Fund spotlights [in Stealing Elections] is the shadowy presence of Acorn. Two and a half years after the debacle in Seattle, Washington’s attorney general indicted seven Acorn workers for their role in what he called “the worst case of voter registration fraud” in the state’s history. In St. Louis, eight Acorn workers pled guilty to election fraud this past April. On the other side of Missouri, in 2006, four Kansas City Acorn workers were indicted after officials deemed nearly 15,000 of their 35,000 registrations phony.

    In the mid-nineties, Barack Obama ran Acorn’s Project Vote campaign in Illinois. He sued the state of Illinois on the group’s behalf in 1995 to implement the Motor Voter law. “After he joined the board of the Woods Fund,” Stealing Elections notes, “Obama saw to it that substantial grants were given to Acorn.” Senator Obama has championed Acorn’s legislative priorities in Congress. His presidential campaign even donated more than $800,000 to Acorn. Obama is the oak grown from Acorn, a group so proud of its association that it boasts “Obama Organizing Fellows” and runs a “Camp Obama” training event. While Acorn boasts of its Obama association, the candidate, of course, is more reticent. That’s because he well knows that many non-dead, non-animal voters would not find a close association with such a group a desirable quality in a potential president." Read the article at City Journal.

Running into a PUMA

I was leaving the library today and a woman in the lobby thrust a Ted Celeste ad at me that she had just picked up from the table. "Is this the Governor Celeste we used to have?" she asked. I just look like I have all the answers, but I could remember Dagmar, his wife's name, but not Governor Celeste's first name. "Oh, he had a lot more hair than that," I said. "Yeah, but in 20 years?" she said. So together we started running through names. "Go inside and ask a librarian," I said. "They love questions like that, then come back out and let me know." So I waited while she went inside. "Richard," she said when she came out.

We chatted a bit on the way to the parking lot and I flashed my McCain-Palin badge that was under my jacket. "Oh, so you're going to vote for a woman," she said, "So am I." We both agreed that we weren't all that thrilled with either Obama or McCain. "I was a Hillary supporter," she said, "She really had some good ideas. I'm just so mad at those Obama people for how they treated her." "Are you a PUMA?" I asked. But she didn't seem to be familiar with the word, but if ever there was an angry, disenfranchised Democrat, she was it. She just wants a woman in the White House. Then in four years. . . I told her I liked Palin because she was a Conservative and so was I. We chatted a bit and then said good-bye and walked to our cars.

The food stamp challenge

A Lutheran church in Seattle took the "Food Stamp Challenge," to see what it was like to live on a food stamp budget of $1 per person, per meal for one week. I blogged about one couple, Jason and Krista, at my other blog.

The present food stamp program began during Johnson’s Great Society in the 1960s (there was a small brief program 1939-1944) and was expanded during the Carter years, and every administration since, including the Republicans. It is now a massive hot potato that no president or congress dare cut. Food stamps were never intended to replace the family’s food income, but to supplement it so they could have a healthier diet. This is the first fallacy of the “Food Stamp Challenge”--they were supposed to be supplementing a modest food plan.

However, the real motivation behind food stamps is/was to help farmers with surpluses. After WWII, our surpluses (huge expansion during the war) went to Europe to help them rebuild, but eventually they weren’t needed there and they had their own food commodity markets and trade. But our farmers were still raising surpluses. So subsidized food surplus was distributed to prop up agriculture, and to generate additional economic activity. It is supposed to be a type of stimulus for the economy--something Jason and Krista who tried the challenge didn't understand. Like many good intentions, it has created a type of dependency, poor planning, huge bureaucracy and frustration among the poor because it doesn’t do more. Every federal budget, food stamps now called SNAP, is expanded and more people and more programs are added.

According to the Cato Institute, “The largest portion of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s budget consists of food subsidies, not farm subsidies. Food subsidies will cost taxpayers $55 billion in fiscal 2007 and account for 61 percent of the USDA’s budget. The largest food subsidy programs are food stamps; the school breakfast and lunch programs; and the women, infants, and children (WIC) program. The federal government as a whole has about 26 food and nutrition programs operated by six different agencies.“

The biggest distributor of these programs is "faith based and community" initiatives like our church, UALC, which participates in and works at the local food pantry (over 90% funded by the government) and the summer lunch programs (all government).

Update: I didn't know that the USDA also was in the business of providing mortgage money for low income families through a church chipping in the down payment, but it is. Story here about Mennonite Self Help Housing.

Off the reservation?

Leftists can't hack it. Blacks and women are not allowed to leave the reservation/plantation/basement/kitchen. Now the working class can't either. As soon as they discovered that "Joe the Plumber" from Ohio could speak better off the cuff and was more knowledgeable than the candidates, BO and Biden, they swung into action to destroy him. Checked his plumber's license. Nope. Checked his union membership. Nope. Checked his voter registration. Yes (although some got that wrong). Checked his taxes. Wow. Look at that! He like thousands of others, still owes Ohio money. No wonder he doesn't want Obama to raise his taxes. Just like they flew a covey of lawyers to Alaska to find dirt on Palin and her husband and children, they have launched a "destroy Joe" campaign.
    Joe's American Dream: "was to have a house, a dog, a couple rifles, a bass boat. I believe in living life easy and simple. I don’t have grand designs. I don’t want much. I just wanna be able to take care of my family and do things with them outdoors and that’s about it, really. I don’t have a “grand scheme” thing. My American Dream is just more personal to me as far as working, making a good living and being able to provide for my family, college for my son. Things like that – simple things in life, that’s really what it comes down to for me. That’s my dream." Interview
Now Obama is lying on the campaign trail about what Joe said. I heard him this morning on the radio. "How many of you know plumbers who make a quarter of a million a year?" he said slipping into a little patois just to be authentic. Joe never said he earned $250,000 a year--he said he'd like to buy the business some day and not pay even more taxes under Obama's plan. Joe's a working guy who'd like to do better someday. Under President Obama, that's not allowed. Step back, working folk. Do the Obama blue collar, black face shuffle.

Pot to Kettle: Martin Nesbitt's tax liens (Obama's treasurer).

See Michelle Malkin who is tracking this.


Update: This comment #23 at Malkin was good: "Thank you to all the MSM hyper Obambi lovers and supporters. Thank you, thank you, thank you. In your zeal and hatred of the American workers you have kept Joe and his story in the news. This could very possibly be your Dukakis in the tank moment. With the race tightening up voters are hearing Obambi over and over again espouse his socialism and the thug-ocracy of the Obambi machine. Thank you again." Marshall Russ

The MSM has tracked down the truth and reported: His name isn't Joe; that's his middle name. Oh the shame and horror!

Our household income fell by one-half under Bush!

Of course. We retired during the Bush years. Eeek! And our insurance costs have gone up! Just like the leftist say. Yes, we're on Medicare, a government health plan and our costs have gone up! Not nearly as good or cost worthy as what I had at the university. And we're not the only ones, we're part of a million household trend. And it will only get worse, unless Obama decrees that the Census reports can no longer be issued until he's finished with the country. Whenever that will be.

Here's a lefty who just doesn't get it.

Wall Street Journal front page feature, the black McCains

Interesting isn't it, when Barack Obama has slave owners both in his African ancestry and his American white ancestry, that WSJ choses 2 weeks before the election to write about McCain's ancestors who owned slaves?
The first Islamic assault on African culture was the jihad that annihilated Coptic Egyptian culture and Greek culture in Northern Africa. Today these areas are Arabic and Islamic.

That was just the thin end of the jihad wedge. Over the next 1400 years, Islam took approximately 25 million slaves out of Africa. An Arabic word for African is abd, the same word that is used for black slave. Arabic has about 40 words for slaves. White slaves are mamluk. Islam took more than a million European slaves into slavery. The highest priced slave in the Meccan slave market was a white woman.

There is great deal of collateral damage when a slave is taken. A warring party attacks a tribe and when enough of the protectors are killed, the rest will surrender and become slaves. All of those who were strong enough to work were taken away in a forced march for days. But there are many who are left behind -- the young, the old, and the sick and injured.

Estimates vary, but from 5 to 10 people left behind died as the result of taking one slave. So for 25 million slaves, we have the deaths of 125 million Africans over a 1400-year period.

When the story of slavery is told in America, as in the movie Roots, the sailors get off the boats and capture the Africans and make them slaves. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

When the white slaver showed up in his wooden ship, he made a business deal with a Muslim wholesaler. Jihad was the machinery that Mohammed used, and his model worked well in Africa as slavers filled the slave pens for the same reason that Mohammed did it: profit. Whites only traded slaves with Islam for about 200 years. Islam was in the slave trade before and after selling to the West
.From every educational and personal achievement measurement, the black McCains and the white McCains seem pretty well matched in the 21st century, regardless of what transpired in the 19th century. We'll never know if the NGOs and western aid hadn't virtually destroyed African culture and propped up despots, 21st Africans would be doing as well as 21st century African-Americns.

WSJ news coverage is among the most liberal of all the MSM. It's difficult to tell sometimes if journalists or left wing social workers are doing the writing, because much of it belongs on the op-ed pages. Generally, the editorial staff and letters to the editor are conservative. I wonder, do the two cultures of this paper even sit together in the lunch room?

What housing crisis?

If there is a housing slump or melt down in my neighborhood, it would be hard to tell from the real estate ads in our SNP Upper Arlington News. If you are from San Francisco or the east coast, these may sound low, but for our neck of the woods, they are high. Plus, I'm familiar with some of these properties and I don't think they were anywhere near these prices 5 years ago. My comments appear after the double slash.
    South of Lane. Wonderful 2 story in historic Old Arlington. Spacious living room and dining room. Hardwood floors, French doors, screened porch, rec room in lower level. Beautiful gardens. $498,500. New Price. // The key word here is "old." The important thing to notice is the agent doesn't mention bathrooms or garage--the photo appears to feature a home about 80 years old, so I'm guessing a 1 car garage and 1.5 baths.

    Cottage style home. Charming 2-story in the Northam Park area. Great details, hdwd floors & built-ins. Generous size living & dining rooms. 1st flr den. 3 BRs, 2 full baths. Paver patio & deck. $398,000. // This is near our old neighborhood, only a bit older--probably built late 20s. From the photo I can see that the "den" is a filled-in porch with windows that don't match the original architecture, a frequent mistake in remodeling. These lots are very small, but with huge gracious trees (very expensive to maintain, btw). Landscaping looks way over grown--probably from early-90s upgrade and now is out of control.

    Loch Lomond. Stately entrance to a limestone terrace. Private 1+ acre lot. Gourmet kitchen, open floor plan. 2-sty great room. 5BR, 5 full & 2 half baths. Terrific floorplan for entertaining. $1,475,000. // Not quite sure where Loch Lomond is but I think it is the northern edge of UA. From photo I'd guess a late 80s design from a catalog. This description means "this is a hard to heat barn"--you can square dance in the entry and fly kites in the great-room. The utility bills for houses like this could put a kid through college.

    Desirable location. This beautiful 4 BR home is located in a prime UA neighborhood on the corner of Abinton and Redding. Recently renovated, the home features a gourmet kit w/granite counter tops, top of the line appliances & a wine cooler. Each BR is completely renovated, while new French drs lead to the extraordinary patio. Boasting new Pella windows, driveway, and exterior stucco, this home is truly a must see! $739,000.// We lived on Abington so I know this house--I think everyone who has ever lived there has remodeled it which might be why the price is so high. That sounds like a fab kitchen, but Redding Rd is a main thoroughfare through Arlington that cuts through what would be a very small area on the edge of Canterbury addition. Virtually no useable yard. If you have young children, I'd look elsewhere.
Yes, there seems to be 1) a lot of money still available, or 2) people not too anxious to move.

Global cooling suggested

Don't buy those funny light bulbs yet. The regular ones help heat your home. Old Farmer's Almanac is predicting we're going into a cooling period and they're not looking at fuzzy caterpillars crossing the road.
    These factors—the cooling Pacific, the yet-to-cool Atlantic, and the historical reduction in recent solar activity—suggest that a staggered cooling period could continue. Absent from most headlines about global warming is a discussion of measures suggesting that the warming has ceased and a cooling may have begun. For example, deep-ocean heat content has not increased during the past five years. Looking at just one year, from January 2007 to January 2008, we find that satellite-derived atmospheric temperatures indicate that Earth was about one degree Fahrenheit cooler at the beginning of 2008 than it was at the beginning of 2007. The United Kingdom's Hadley Centre ocean and land temperature records show cooling in the last seven to ten years.

Are you government approved?

Check out this website and see! I am approved--my BMI was 22.46. But all these folks the government says are overweight:
    OVERWEIGHT:
    Barry Bonds: 6'2": 228 lbs: 29
    David Boreanaz: 6'2": 218 lbs: 28
    Tom Brady: 6'4": 225 lbs: 27
    President Bush: 5'11": 191 lbs: 26
    Nic Cage: 6'1": 210 lbs: 28
    George Clooney: 5'11": 211 lbs: 29
    Tom Cruise: 5'7": 170 lbs: 26
    Matt Damon: 5'11": 187 lbs: 26
    Johnny Depp: 5'7": 190 lbs: 27
    David Duchovny: 6'0": 212 lbs: 29
    Vin Diesel: 6'2": 200 lbs: 26
    Cheryl Ford: 6'3": 215 lbs:27
    Harrison Ford: 6'1": 218 lbs: 29
    Brendan Fraser: 6'3": 234 lbs: 29
    Richard Gere: 5'11": 187 lbs: 26
    Ethan Hawke: 5'9": 172 lbs: 25
    Hugh Jackman: 6'2": 210 lbs: 27
    Lebron James: 6'8": 240 lbs: 26
    Dale Jarrett: 6'2": 200 lbs: 26
    Bobby Labonte: 5'9": 170 lbs: 25
    Nick Lachey: 5'10": 180 lbs: 26
    Karl Malone: 6'9": 259 lbs: 28
    Dr. Phil McGraw: 6'4": 240 lbs: 29
    Mark McGuire (playing weight): 6'5": 250 lbs: 30
    Donovan McNabb: 6'3": 240 lbs: 30
    Yao Ming: 7'6": 310 lbs: 27
    Brad Pitt: 6'0": 203 lbs: 28
    Keanu Reeves: 6'1": 223 lbs: 29
    Cal Ripken: 6'4": 210 lbs: 27
    Andy Roddick: 6'2": 197 lbs: 25
    Will Smith: 6'2": 210 lbs: 27
    Sammy Sosa: 6'0": 220 lbs: 30
    Denzel Washington: 6'0": 199 lbs: 27
    Bruce Willis: 6'0": 200 lbs: 29
    Billy Zane: 6'2": 210 lbs: 27

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Do American schools not graduate any physics students?

Does the Zhong Group at Ohio State University look a little unbalanced to you?

Older, male and Protestants lean toward McCain

Jews (78%), other (71%) and no religion (61%) are going for Obama big time. People over 45 are going 45% for McCain, with only 32% in the 65+ age group for Obama. Protestants are 53% for McCain. Males about 50% and single women are all ga-ga over Obama, 62% to 25%.

The one that really puzzles me is investors in a dead heat, 45% and 45%, with 11% undecided. Someone really doesn't understand economics or how we got this melt down. Or how the Democrats tried to block for the last year and a half (since they came into power) any investigation of the GSE's roll role in the subprime housing mess. See IBD poll as of yesterday.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/Polls.aspx?id=308947386648301

From the fraud we see in Ohio perpetrated by the Obama campaign, I doubt this poll will mean much.

What a first class education and 30 years experience will get you

J-O-B-S is a three letter word. Joe Biden.

I hope Sarah got a good laugh. I sure did.

Wake up America, and smell the gas


"The first results of the survey indicate previous assessments have severely underestimated Turkmenistan's gas reserves. The BP Statistical Review of World Energy, an industry bible, sets the country's reserves at 2.67 trillion cubic meters. Analysts expect that to be upgraded in light of the information on South Yolotan.

The findings suggest Turkmenistan should be able to confidently move ahead with plans to boost its exports of gas. At the moment, it sells most of its gas to Russia -- about 50 billion cubic meters a year, which is mostly resold to Ukraine -- and a little to Iran. But it has plans to export to China and Europe too, as well as significantly boost sales to Russia. China is building a pipeline from Turkmenistan that will have the capacity to bring 30 billion cubic meters a year, and Ashgabad has also agreed to sell 10 billion cubic meters to Europe. The European Union hopes that a gas pipeline will one day be built across the Caspian Sea, which would enable direct imports of Turkmen gas, bypassing Russia."
WSJ, Oct. 16, 2009

Now that the fifth largest natural gas field in the world has been found in Turkmenistan, let‘s review what Governor Palin of Alaska, which has the mother load of energy resources for the USA, told Charlie Gibson about our relationship with Putin and former Soviet republics like the Ukraine. You didn’t see this part of the interview because ABC which is in the tank for Obama was trying to make her look like a beauty queen ingénue.
    GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

    PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.
    But NATO, I think, should include Ukraine, definitely, at this point and I think that we need to — especially with new leadership coming in on January 20, being sworn on, on either ticket, we have got to make sure that we strengthen our allies, our ties with each one of those NATO members.

    We have got to make sure that that is the group that can be counted upon to defend one another in a very dangerous world today.

    GIBSON: And you think it would be worth it to the United States, Georgia is worth it to the United States to go to war if Russia were to invade.

    PALIN: What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We have got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries.

    And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is what it leads to.

    It doesn’t have to lead to war and it doesn’t have to lead, as I said, to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries.

    His mission, if it is to control energy supplies, also, coming from and through Russia, that’s a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.

Reduced to holding pancake breakfasts?

I checked the website of the Prairie Fire Collective, the Weatherman group created in the late 1970s by Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers. There was an ad on the page for a pancake breakfast fund raiser, although it was for December 2006. You really don't know whether to laugh or cry.

The Prairie Fire Collective favored coming out of hiding, with members facing the criminal charges against them, while the May 19 Coalition continued in hiding. A decisive factor in Dohrn's coming out of hiding were her concerns about her children according to Wikipedia. The Prairie Fire Collective started to surrender to the authorities from the late 1970s to the early 1980s. The remaining Weatherman Underground members continued to violently attack US institutions. East coast members favored a commitment to violence and challenged commitments of old leaders, Bernadine Dohrn, Bill Ayers and Jeff Jones.

Here's their statement of purpose. It has Bill and Bernadine written all over it.
    We oppose oppression in all its forms including racism, sexism, homophobia, classism and imperialism. We demand liberation and justice for all peoples. We recognize that we live in a capitalist system that favors a select few and oppresses the majority. This system cannot be reformed or voted out of office because reforms and elections do not challenge the fundamental causes of injustice.

    Prairie Fire Organizing Committee.

The unrepentent Bill and Bernadine Ayers

Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers turned themselves in on December 3, 1980, in New York. Charges were dropped for Ayers. Dohrn received three years probation and a $15,000 fine. These criminals and others of the anti-war protest groups who tried to destroy the USA in the 1960s and 1970s went scot free and government officials who had violated privacy laws during their investigation were tried during the Carter Administration, receiving stiff fines, prison terms and ruined careers. They were later pardoned by Reagan. [See Wikipedia article which contains citations]

Here's what Bill Ayers, who provided the spring board for Barack Obama's career in leftist politics by including him in the Annenberg Project to radicalize Chicago school children, said in 1970. To my knowledge, he hasn't recanted, but Palin is roundly criticized by the MSM and Obama campaign as "racist" for bringing up his friendship with Obama.
    "We were talking the other night and we realized that all our heroes are dead. Wow, what a trip! Ché, Nguyen Van Troi, the Vietnamese who tried to get McNamara. We're running their pictures in our paper with the line 'Live Like Him!' and they've all been killed. Outtasight, man. We've got a new slogan for the people that are going down to help with the sugar harvest: 'Cuba is for the Living!' "

    Ayers' remarks typify Weatherman's tendency to define its situation in terms of extremes. Building socialism in Cuba is for the living; overthrowing American imperialism is a death trip. Weatherman, as early as the action in the streets of Chicago, already had begun to live in the shadow of death. Not long after the "Days of Rage," Weatherman would compensate for its death trip mentality with hedonistic orgies. Like a pendulum, moving from one extreme to the other, Weatherman swung from death trips to life trips to death trips … . Bill Ayers is quoted in an article by John Kifner, "Vandals in the Mother Country," New York Times Magazine, January 4, 1970. This quote appears in the publication, Weatherman, by Harold Jacobs, Ramparts Press, 1970. p. 86

Independent, non-profit, non-partisan, pt. 2

When I encounter a new name or organization I first go to the “about us” page, and then to the “funding” if I can find it (and that’s extremely difficult because so many political, community and church organizations both on the left and the right try to disguise or downplay this), and I then look at the “staff” or “advisory board” or “contacts” if possible (that too is sometimes hidden, but you may find an address).

SourceWatch (a wiki) mentioned below defined itself as “a collaborative project of the Center for Media and Democracy to produce a directory of the people, organizations and issues shaping the public agenda.” However, when I looked up that organization and moved past its own glowing descriptions, I found this definition at Activist Cash.com.
    “The Center for Media & Democracy (CMD) is a counterculture public relations effort disguised as an independent media organization. CMD isn’t really a center it would be more accurate to call it a partnership, since it is essentially a two-person operation.” . . “Their books Mad Cow U.S.A. and Toxic Sludge Is Good for You! were produced and promoted using grant monies from the Foundation for Deep Ecology ($25,000) and the Education Foundation of America ($20,000), among others. Along with the more recent Trust Us: We’re Experts, these books are scare-mongering tales about a corporate culture out of control, and each implies that the public needs rescuing. Guess who the heroes in this fantasy are? “
If I had scrolled through more stuff on the SourceWatch page and found these titles, I could have figured out all by myself that it is a shill for leftist causes.

Of course, this means I have to go to the “about us” page of Activist Cash.com and find out who funds them.
    “This site, created by the Center for Consumer Freedom, is committed to providing detailed and up-to-date information about the funding source of radical anti-consumer organizations and activists. We have analyzed over 410,000 pages of IRS documents to create this database, and new information will be added every month.

    The organizations we track on this site are tax-exempt nonprofits. That means you have the right to know what they're up to. The same rule applies to the tax-exempt foundations that pay their bills.”
So then I need to find out what is Center for Consumer Freedom who is paying the bills for Activist Cash.com who is checking on Source Watch who is watching the speaker from AEI who is telling the health care employees at a conference this week, how to use incentives, which just might be affecting my own personal health.

At its “about us” page I learn that
    “The Center for Consumer Freedom is supported by over 100 companies and thousands of individual consumers. From farm to fork, from urban to rural, our friends and supporters include businesses, their employees, and their customers.

    The Center is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization. We file regular statements with the Internal Revenue Service, which are open to public inspection.”
Looking through their material I see a lot on the food and nutrition industry and animal rights scams. So now I know it represents business interests of its clients, so we’re right back to the socialist do-gooders fighting the nasty mean capitalists, or WHAT ELSE IS NEW?

Independent, non-profit, non-partisan, pt. 1

These words have lost their meaning in today‘s political climate. They might have meaning for their tax status, but not their reliability, their slant or values. Ignore these terms when seeking information and do more than a cursory background check before trusting.

Today I was attempting to look up information on a “consumer health care incentives” conference taking place this week. I found that web page from a table of contents that a publisher sent in an e-mail to a librarian list. All the conference topics used what I would call either jargon or mush terms--impossible for the outsider (like me who worked in a medical library for 14 years) to discern. But I could figure out the conference logo--a large carrot dangling in front of buildings labeled hospital, insurance company, government, etc. inside what looked like a stamp. So I examined the list of speakers and just picked one, Thomas P. Miller, who was presenting a paper for AEI, American Enterprise Institute, which I would define as libertarian in its economic views, conservative in its social views, and all over the map politically. Over the years I have found their reports and papers to be trustworthy and well-researched, even if I don‘t always agree with their conclusions.

After browsing Mr. Miller’s resume I found a google link directing me to a wiki, Source Watch. Wikis are all over the internet--they are user-created encyclopedias and they are not peer-reviewed--your 13 year old could contribute and probably has because anyone can edit the information an expert just contributed 30 minutes ago. The most famous wiki is probably Wikipedia, but they are proliferating like pet rabbits loosed after Easter. Sometimes a wiki can help you get someplace, but they are not in the same class with Encyclopedia Britannica which began publishing in 1768 or The World Book that you may remember from your schools days. Their advantage is they often contain really obscure information that isn’t available in a true encyclopedia.

Next entry will continue this theme, but now it's time to go to the coffee shop.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

What Sarah really said to Charlie

Remember how she was denigrated and dissed for that interview? Read the full interview and see what was edited out. She had a whole lot more to say about Russia and Iran than what we heard.

The Charlotte Front and Center is a PUMA website for Hillary supporters and it is supporting McCain-Palin in their anger over the sexism and misogyny by the Obama people and supporters in the MSM.

Book TV

Each week I enjoy tuning in a few minutes or hours to Book-TV on C-SPAN, and it was gone! There in its place was a tour of Korea. So I googled asking what had happened to it. It's now on 94, which means I can't get it in my office because I don't have a box.
    Bucyrus, Circleville, Columbus, Delaware, Galion, Kenton, Lancaster, Marysville, Mount Gilead, Mount Vernon, Pataskala, Thornville and Zanesville channel lineups

    Big Ten Network will move to Standard Channel 58.

    When available, BTN alternate games will air on Digital Channels 153-156.
    Travel Channel will move to Basic Channel 14.

    Time Warner Connection returns to Channel 24.

    C-SPAN 2 will move to Digital Broadcast Channel 94.

    Product Information Network (PIN) will launch on Digital Variety
    Channel 166.
I just hate it when they mess with my favorites.

Vote from Home--in Columbus, Ohio

What a handsome group! Marc Gustafson, the founder, seems to be in two places at once--Columbus, Ohio and Oxford University where he is in Middle East Studies. His permanent address for campaign contributions is New York. He speaks Arabic.
    Vote from Home is a Political Action Committee established in 2007 by a group of Marshall, Rhodes, Fulbright and Truman Scholars. VHF's mission is to recruit and track early Democratic voters in Ohio for the 2008 Election.
Walter Cronkite, former news man and Robert N. Downey of Goldman Sachs are listed on the Advisory Board of his other organization Reach The World, which Marc also founded. Marc and his group, none of whom are from Columbus, decided they needed to come to Ohio to register Democratic voters. Who knows if it is legal. They are living on Brownlee, according to Michelle Malkin. How much of this is going on in the critical states under various names? Why do these carpetbaggers think the residents who live here and pay taxes here can't be trusted with the ballot? Do we need snobby, east coast kids who travel around the world and study in Europe to come here for a few months and 'splain it to us dummies? We've got 50,000 students on one campus at OSU, plus Capital, Wittenberg and Columbus State. With OCLC, Chem Abstracts, Battelle, and OSU we are the information capital of the USA. But apparently we're too dumb to know how to register and vote!

Update: Story about the group on Brownlee in Columbus Dispatch.

How to get our tax money back from ACORN

I just sent off my absentee ballot. I took the warning on the bottom seriously:
    "Whoever commits election falsification is guilty of a felony of the Fifth degree."
Didn't even say "voting" just falsification. ACORN has been committing a lot of election falsification in Ohio and saying it's up to Jennifer Brunner to figure it out because it can't be responsible for all its workers. Then Brunner says she can't be expected to correct it--there isn't time.

So I looked up 5th degree felony (Ohio felony sentencing law by Burt W. Griffin and Lewis R. Katz is the source cited on the 'net). The penalty is 6-12 months in jail and a $2,500 fine. What if ACORN had to return to the jurisdiction $2,500 for every falsified registration? Might put a huge crimp in that $800,000 Obama gave them for "services." What if Brunner had to pay up for election falsification?

The house on Brownlee according to Malkin contains out of state folks here only long enough to register others, and vote absentee. They are Marc Gustafson, Heather Halstead, Daniel Hemel, Jen Kyle and Greg Nolan. Nice, clean cut looking Ivy League type kids (except Gustafson and Halstead (a couple?) are no kids) working for non-profits, government and businesses, all here to steal our election. Two Truman scholars and two Marshall scholars. Tell me again, Heather MacDonald what exactly you don't like about Sarah Palin's small town, western values and ethics? I'd put her up against these moral midgets any day.

Why wasn't a 92% death rate enough?

Better science doesn't always mean a better life (Nov 2005). At least not a Down Syndrome baby. A faster, more accurate test for Down Syndrome.
    Published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine (Nov. 10, 2005 issue), the study is known as the FASTER trial (First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk). It was funded by a $13 million grant from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development – one of the largest ever grants for an obstetrical study.
But even in 1998 the termination rate following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome was 92 per cent Research here.Think of it. $13 million of our tax money so parents and doctors can know even earlier. Does an earlier abortion cause less guilt? Less grief as the years go by?

Dear Heather MacDonald

While on my walk this morning I listened to your complete interview on Laura Ingraham [your article here]. As I understand it, when you go to the polls in 3 weeks you are choosing between Barack Obama and Sarah Palin, not Obama and McCain. You think Obama has a better grasp of economic issues than Palin because he is articulate, thinks things through and has degrees from prestigious institutions (you didn't actually say that, but it was implied with typical east coast arrogance). Also, although Obama isn't staying home with his children and believes Down Syndrome babies should be aborted, you finally conceded when pushed by Ingraham that Palin should stay home with her baby, because that is the traditional conservative view.

Here are five points you overlooked.
    1) Of the four people running for office (and you're right either Joe or Sarah could become president the day after the inauguration), Sarah Palin is
      a) the only one with conservative credentials, and
      b) the only one with balls.

    2) Of the four people running for office, Sarah Palin is the only one who didn't have the opportunity in 2006 to turn this Fannie/Freddie subprime mess around and save the economy. John McCain tried for more regulation, Joe Biden and Barack Obama sided with all the other Democrats and fought it. These three Senators failed to save us.

    3) Of the four people running for office, most of the Congress, the President, most of the cabinet, and most especially the Ben and Hank club, Sarah Palin is the only one who did NOT go to one of those prestigious schools like Dartmouth, Yale, Harvard or Columbia.

    4) Of the four people running for office, Palin is the only one who doesn't stammer and stutter off teleprompter, who hasn't been coached to lie to us through nonsensical press interviews. Although I'm plenty sick of the phrases "Joe Six-Pack" and "Hockey-Moms" and might have preferred a ticket of say Mitt Romney and Condi Rice, conservatives didn't want a Mormon, and Democrats don't allow black women, even Republicans, to leave the plantation.

    5) And read the research, Heather. It is the marriage of women to the father that reduces poverty among children, not whether she stays home or works. The idea behind welfare was a government plan to keep women at home with the children. See how well that worked out?

Where is the laundress when you need her?

Last week I did some ironing--and tackled a bit more this morning. The Laundress seems to be rather erratically blogging these days. I don't know if she had as much laundry as she claimed, but it was always interesting.

The 20 lbs I lost 2 years ago have been creeping back since our trip to Ireland last September, to which was added all that pasta in Italy in June. So I got out some cotton slacks that were too big for me the winter of 2006 but now are bulging where they shouldn't. There's a rule of thumb in weight loss--5 lbs is a dress size (assuming you aren't obese). This rule doesn't work for slacks, at least not for the pear shaped maiden/woman. For slacks, it's the rule of thigh, not thumb. I'd guess 7 lbs, and you've blown it. Although it probably depends on where you carry your weight. Say what you want about Hillary's legs, but this is the healthiest body style--slim waist, heavy thighs and legs. Sure, you don't get those Hollywood or modeling jobs, and no one chases you at the beach, but you also are less likely to have heart attacks, diabetes and breast cancer as you age.

This week I packed up at least 5 or 6 pair of slacks and jeans that ranged from size 4 to 8, (expensive brands have a come-on of smaller size tags), all purchased at the Discovery Shop for about $4 each. Some were wool, some cotton, some poly-whatever blend. I'm back in the 10s, at least until I can get control of that craving for Pumpkin ice cream that is only available this time of year. In the fall I'm like a squirrel preparing for a long winter.

The house is loaded with food I don't usually keep on hand. We got the bad news Monday that our house guests won't be coming--she's in the hospital in Alexandria, VA with pneumonia. And since they live in Huntington Beach, CA, they aren't too happy about that. So having too much food around is a small problem compared to what these dear loved ones are going through. It's never fun to be hospitalized, but if you have to be, better close to home where you have your own doctor, and your kids are near by.

So if your prayer list isn't already jammed, please add a total stranger, sister Kate.

Are you an artist?

Here's some instruction on the web by James Gurney that will make you weep with envy and fill you with resolve to get all those supplies out and ready to go! I used to do that sketching trick from the van windows when we'd travel back from Lake Erie with watercolor pencils.

Why Blacks are supporting Obama

1) He's pro-life, 2) he won't withdraw the troops until the job is done, 3) Sarah Palin is his VP choice. Wow.



HT Dr. Sanity and Cheat Seeking Missiles

If you were poor or low income

sitting on the edge of the bottom quintile, hoping to move up a notch, which would you prefer:
  1. a job in an Ohio coal mine in Appalachia at $25/hour, or a job at an interstate McDonald's at $8/hour serving the people from Columbus and Cleveland who come down to see the fall colors in Appalachia

  2. the opportunity to shop at a Walmart on the outskirts of your community once a week, or driving 60 miles after filling the tank for the round trip to a Walmart 2 counties away to shop once a month

  3. living in your humble 2 bedroom home which grandpa bought in a not so great neighborhood near your friends and church, or being pushed into a balloon mortgage out in the suburbs by developers who bought the land with the help of city council rezoning to "revitalize" the down town

  4. being denied access to military recruiters who might make promises and come through on 50% of them, or hang out on the street corners with your friends and do a few drugs

  5. a job that has potential but no guarantees, or the security of a steady income stream from WIC, low income housing support, food stamps and SCHIP

  6. a used automobile that's not very fuel efficient or bus transportation that might get you within 2 miles of shopping and the doctor's office

  7. a used automobile that's not very fuel efficient or a fancy 10 speed bike and snappy lycra shorts with matching helmet
Don't answer based on your income or education in 2008, answer truthfully what you would do if your income was $20,000 a year. Think local, not global, as the tree huggers would say. You can't create another scenario. This is my fantasy, not yours.

The Death Penalty

Unlike many Democrats who support the death penalty for inconvenient or impaired babies, and many Republicans who will save babies but not wretched criminals, I do not support the death penalty. But if I did, Ohio's own fatso complainer, who first claimed he was too fat, then that he got fat in prison, surely deserved it. If you want to read more about this worthless piece of slime, for whom Jesus gave his life because all of us are fallen and don't live up to God's standard of perfection, read Cheat Seeking Missiles.

Anthropogenic global climate change

That big word means simply, "human caused,"--it's the same word stem as "anthopology" the study of humans, or "anthopomorphic," giving God human qualities or attributes. Anthropogenic global climate change theories and worries may be the absolute height of ANTHROPOCENTRICITY, the belief that humans are the most significant entity of the universe and everything must be interpreted in terms of our experience, especially science. Are you ready to come down a notch or two.

The human contribution to the greenhouse effect is 0.28%. Ocean biologic activity, volcanoes, decaying plants, animal activity, etc. (none of which we can control) accounts for 4.72%, and 95% of it is caused by water vapor. Feel better now? Less guilty or more helpless? If these stats make you feel more helpless, it's because of your wanting to feel powerful, the root is your anthropocentricity. If you feel less guilty, then you probably suspected all along they were feeding you a load of crap.

And here's some more. The human contribution to sources of CO2 emissions is 3.4%. Nature does the rest--96.6%.

Every region, state and city seems to be writing and passing standards and legislation for either green house gases, or CO2 emissions or both while we the voters watch Dancing with the Stars or cheer the Buckeyes or pull our hair out over the Bengals. Wake up America. They are stealing our country (what we haven't already destroyed with sloth, gambling, pornography, hedonism, and turning away from God) with massive e-regulations you never voted on that will put Kyoto to shame. The EPA is expanding at such a rate, that the head may soon have to fight Hank Paulson to determine who is the most powerful!

Ohio is already loaded with this alternative-save-the-planet stuff, with only lip service being given to the economic advantages of clean coal, which is God's stored sunshine and energy just waiting for us to be grateful. And don't you think the rest of the country isn't eyeing Lake Erie--the next battle over water will make fights over oil look like squabbles on the playground!

Read this policy analysis on the expanding authority of the EPA.

A financial crisis, not an economic crisis

Could have fooled me, but here's what an expert says. And wasn't it the experts that got us into this mess?
    It turns out that John McCain, who was widely mocked for saying that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong," was actually right. We're in a financial crisis, not an economic crisis. We're not entering a second Great Depression, says Casey B. Mulligan is a professor of economics at the University of Chicago.

    How do we know? Well, the economy outside the financial sector is healthier than it seems.Daily Policy Digest, digesting Casey B. Mulligan, "An Economy You Can Bank On," New York Times, Oct. 10, 2008

Following the Jennifer Brunner story

Maggie is on top of this. Check out her story If you Democrats think your guy is so great, there's no need for him to steal the election. And you Republicans keep in mind the local elections matter too.

"Acorn -- the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now -- has been around since 1970 and boasts 350,000 members. Acorn is now getting more attention as John McCain's campaign makes an issue of the fraud reports and Acorn's ties to Barack Obama. It's about time someone exposed this shady outfit that uses government dollars to lobby for larger government, says the Wall Street Journal." Read more.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Bailing with a hole in the bucket

Guest blogger Murray says:
    I know that you know it is not too comforting knowing that the same people who allowed this country's subprime mortgage crisis to happen are the ones that our government put in charge of fixing it. I also know that you know that they really don't have the slightest knowledge how to fix it. I also know that you know that this is really a bailout to the Wall Street high flyers and the sleazy investment banking business. Now they are adding the very bankers that caused the stink to the team assigned to fix the problem. It seems that once you're in bed with them you can't get rid of them. Kinda like bedbugs.

    Since it's the subprime mortgages that are the basis of the problem I would think the first thing they would do is put a stop to making these ridiculous loans. They have not done this. Banks and mortgage companies are still creating such loans. You can go to google and ask for "low price no money down mortgages" and you'll find all kinds of ads for these kinds of loans. It's pretty obvious to me that if we don't stop loaning with no money down and bad credit the "bailout" will go on forever.You can even apply on line. Here are a couple of examples:

    http://www.mortgage-helper.com/zerodown.html

    http://www.forthebestrate.com/no-money-down-mortgage.aspx

    OK, the damage has been done. Our astute legislators are throwing billions of our hard earned tax dollars all over the place. They say not to worry cause the are going to sell these worthless mortgage packages and they will get the money back. Why... they say we might even make a profit!! Well, let me tell you. IF THEY DO FIND SOMEONE DUMB ENOUGH TO BUY THESE WORTHLESS PACKAGES JUST WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY WILL DO WITH THE MONEY? Pay it towards the national debt? No, No, NO..... They will do the same thing they always do. THEY WILL SPEND IT. Folks, once they voted to spend that 700 billion, that money was spent never to return. That money can only be returned by you and I. The tax man cometh. If OBAMA gets elected it will come immediately. Find a way to protect yourself. Your first attempt would be to vote for McCain as feeble as that may be.
MURRAY

Why can't OSU cite its own or peer reviewed research?

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. It's happened twice now in about 6 weeks. If I see something health related in my OSU human resources site I think I should expect something other than shilling for an anti-aging supplement company. I noticed an article under Wellness about Vitamin D and immunity. It's flu season so I clicked on it and it brought up an interesting page (reformated from the original) about vitamin D research. I made the assumption I was reading research from the University's canyons of labs, offices, gov't grants and libraries, but by the time I started rolling through footnotes that began with #25, I realized something was wrong. So I scrolled to the bottom and got a link to Life Extension Magazine, a pop-health webpage that sells anti-aging supplements! And it wasn't even current--it was almost 2 years old!

The first time I was caught was a scare story about plastic baby bottles--that link led to an advocacy page loaded with the words, "might," "could," "it is thought," and nothing concrete out of thousands of studies.

If an OSU researcher has a break through, ah-ha moment, and it's out there at a popular science or consumer health website, by all means, let us know. But don't be making stuff up, folks, and sending off to buy supplements.

Meet the most powerful man in the world

until January 20, 2009. Who said you wouldn't get to the top with a degree in English (the degree of choice for directionless students when I was in school)?


Henry Merritt Paulson, Jr., was born on March 28, 1946, in Palm Beach, Florida. He graduated from Dartmouth College with a bachelor's degree in English in 1968 and from Harvard University with a master's degree in business administration in 1970.

Paulson began his career as a staff assistant to the assistant secretary of Defense from 1970 to 1972. He then became a member of the White House Domestic Council in the administration of Richard Nixon, serving as a staff assistant to the President from 1972 to 1973.

After his time in Washington, D.C., Paulson joined Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, at their Chicago offices in 1974. He became partner in 1982, and from 1983 until 1988 he was the head of the Investment Banking Services for the Midwest region. In 1988, he became managing partner of the Chicago office, and in 1994, he was appointed to the position of President and chief operating officer. In 1999, he became chairman and chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs.

President George W. Bush nominated Paulson as secretary of the Department of Treasury in 2006, and the U.S. Senate unanimously confirmed him on June 28, 2006. As the seventy-fourth secretary of the Treasury, Paulson is the leading policy adviser to the President on domestic and international economic affairs.

From The American Presidents On line reference source at Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904

Marxism, a refresher

All history, according to marxism (named for Karl Marx 1818-1883) is a struggle between the exploiter (in modern times, the capitalist) and the exploited (the worker). The struggle will only cease when capitalism is destroyed and a classless society exists. The golden age arrives when private property, marriage, nationality, and religions are abolished. Religion is a tool of the oppressor, as are conventional or traditional ethics and idealism (including humanism and liberalism). High on the list of marxist ideals are concern for public health, a sense of public duty (even if it has to be required), mutual respect, moral purity, modesty, brotherhood above family, race and class, and a solidarity with working people everywhere. Fraternity with capitalists, of course, is excluded from these principles, and class hatred is permitted for the cause of assuring justice. For Christians, this is most clear in Liberation Theology and Black Liberation Theology, both of which have made great inroads in both conservative and liberal Christian groups, who have become impatient to "bring in the Kingdom" while expelling God and replacing him with "the poor."
    Beginning in Latin America, Liberation Theology is based on the belief that the Christian Gospel demands "a preferential option for the poor," and that the church should be involved in the struggle for economic and political justice in the contemporary world—particularly in the Third World. Dating to the Second Vatican Council (1962-65) and the Second Latin American Bishops Conference, held in Medellin, Colombia (1968), the movement brought poor people together in Christian-based communities, to study the Bible and to fight for social justice. However, since the 1980s, the church hierarchy has criticized liberation theology and its advocates, accusing them of wrongly supporting violent revolution and Marxist class struggle” (Columbia University Encyclopedia 2004).

    Black Theology developed alongside Latin Liberation Theology and had its roots in the Civil Rights and the Black Power movements of the 1960s. In the process, many “black ministers consciously separated their understanding of the gospel of Jesus from white Christianity and identified it with the struggles of the black poor for justice.” Rev. Wright correctly credits two books written by James Cone, “Black Theology and Black Power” in 1969 and “A Black Theology of Liberation” in 1970, that made liberation the organizing centre of his theological system and subsequently of many Black churches.While Latin Liberation Theology was concerned with classism and Black Theology was concerned with racism, both held a common concern for the poor (Westminster Dictionary of Christian Theology 1984). Orthodoxy Today
Liberalism used to mean free from restraint, particularly from a system, like the church or a federal or national government. It eventually came to promote the interests of the middle class which included helping the disadvantaged and minorities, non-violence and environmentalism because in the long run, liberals would benefit. In past years, liberals and marxists were hand shaking enemies because marxists can't tolerate personal freedom. But liberals were much more hostile toward conservatives who see justice as a moral code existing outside their own vested interests (usually but not always, God), so increasingly liberals in the USA have assisted and promoted and been swallowed up by the marxists.

Barack Hussein Obama is not a Muslim, he is a Christian and a marxist as illustrated above--they are not necessarily incompatible. If your "Christian" label pre-dates Liberation Theology, you'll just have to adjust. Get over it. But whatever label you give him, he hates capitalism, which means he is not good for America and your 401-K or your annuities or your health plan (or Europe, or the struggling Third World economies, for that matter). This is clear in the way he has taken advantage of the huge meltdown of capitalism in the past month, almost prematurely dancing on its grave, while rushing in with the claim that he will save us from the jaws of death. He is funded and backed by notorious criminals both here and abroad, progressives and marxists who go by a variety of names--like George Soros, Moveon.org, Hate America First, Daily Kos Kids, and ACORN who are about to dismantle our right to vote, and then will go after our freedom of information. I would add the feminists in that marxist crowd, except they're the only ones who are true to their team and have stayed poor--they haven't been much use to him except to make the coffee like the good old days of the 60s.

Some Christians amaze me

Not because of their good works, or their awesome miracles, their faith that moves mountains, but because they have any faith at all. I was reading Andy's account of the death watch at his father's bed. We've done this twice--in 1996 for my sister and my husband's step-father. You are with them, and yet they aren't there. But I didn't rush to the hospitals in Bradenton and Indianapolis loaded with personal baggage. How much harder that would have made saying good-bye. Andy writes:
    We had a good week anyway. We laughed a lot, and cried a little. We spent time with funeral home staff members, lawyers, doctors, and nurses, but we still had a lot of time left over to reminisce, to compare memories and to try to make some sense out of the chaos of a home that featured an alcoholic, crazy mother and a philandering, adulterous father who would grab his car keys and drive away whenever the butcher knives appeared, my mother’s weapon of choice to torment the kids. He ran away from us all his life. Now he can’t run anymore.

    He’s left behind a mess. His estate, such as it is, was left to a former roommate who is now dead. His latest will, which was supposed to designate my Columbus sister Cathy as the recipient of his home, was never signed, and so the good State of Ohio gets to figure it all out. My dad’s house apparently goes to the estate of the former roommate. Whoopee. I’m washing my hands of the whole affair, even though technically I’ve been named as the executor of his will. It’s what I told him I would do, and would not do when he told me he was leaving the house to his roommate. I refuse to execute injustice, at least if I can help it.
Many days I remember to thank God for my fine, upright, honest parents, who worked hard and loved their children and extended family, always available for moral and economic support. And I ask forgiveness for the many times I was cranky or short with them when they didn't see things my way. After all, they weren't "fun," they rarely talked about our accomplishments (would be unseemly), we didn't take vacations, they often ignored my demands for more attention, they insisted that I do the right thing, be respectful and have good manners. I had to go to church, had to earn my own way, had to do well in school (actually, they never, ever said that--it was my own idea based on what I thought they wanted). They wouldn't take my kids off my hands when I was desperate for a break and oftened ignored my own failures at parenting, and just looked the other way! My Dad could be so casual about money that one time he sent me $10,000 (coupon bond) in the U.S. mail uninsured with no information or explanation about what it was. Even when I was 60 years old he thought he needed to remind me to put on an apron, but by then I could get back at him by hugging him, something not on his list. Some of the best times I had with Dad were the last two years of his life, and I still wonder why we waited so long. And when their time this side of eternity was over, they simply closed their eyes and were gone. Then there are the days I completely forget about them and think I got here all on my own, without their genes, love, hard work and discipline. Andy's blog was a good reminder.

65th wedding anniversary, 1999

At least she's honest

When looking through LibGuides that I mentioned a few posts back, I came across a library guide (don't remember the institution) for information on global warming. All of it led to sources that I would call pro-anthropogenic (human caused) climate change. One of the nice features of LibGuides is you can e-mail or text message the librarian who created the resource for additional information. Their photos are even posted--and I tell you, librarians today are much more attractive than my graduating class. Anyway, she responded: "This guide was created to support a teach-in that was not intended to present the other viewpoint." I'm not sure how a librarian assigned to a "teach-in" differs in responsibility from preparing materials for a regular class, but I suspect either way, you get the view of the librarian, not a range of viewpoints and studies.

Librarians always bring their personal values and viewpoints to their work--maybe moreso than some other professions. Librarians have a value system that is a blend of missionary and social worker. They are do-gooders in sensible shoes. When I was at the Ohio State Veterinary library, I purchased a nice collection of pet health books--the kind you can buy in pet stores for owners, not for researchers or veterinarians, the people I was hired to serve. It was my personal view, and it was not in my collection statement which gave the official version, that better educated pet owners would benefit both the animal world and the veterinarian. Also, I had lots and lots of unassigned gift money. In those days, my library was both the first stop or last resort for both children and adults because the public libraries had so little. Nor could a public library afford to buy books on relatively obscure breeds or pets (I also had an excellent collection for owners of snakes, flying squirrels, hamsters, rabbits, llamas etc.) I think I saved a lot of animals' lives by advising students to use a plant species instead of animal for their science project. If a beloved pet died, I often got the call. Well, was I going to describe Cushing's Disease in Fido from a textbook or a breed specific book? (And yes, of course, I would tell them to talk to their vet, but these people were in deep shock and grief.) And then you find out he was 18 years old and had practically been on life support for two years, and the owner was still grieving. So you put all those research skills aside and just listen letting the other work pile up. In my own mind, I justified stepping away from my primary duties as good PR for the college and library opting for the long range benefits rather than short term gain.

But I don't know why other librarians do what they do, except I know absolutely that politics goes with them to the work place. When you look at a library guide whether on-line or in print, look for what's missing.

Getting a head start on stealing the election

American Thinker poses a scenario where Obama and McCain are neck and neck after a last minute rally by McCain in the final weeks of the campaign. The polls are closed and McCain is leading by only 50,000 votes and then. . . our Secretary of State (register-and-vote-on-the-same-day Jenny) "discovers" some uncounted votes in Cuyahoga County.
    "Meet Jennifer Brunner, Ohio's real life Secretary of State, whose actions in the lead up to this election have been so shamefully partisan -- violating both federal and state law in the process -- that it is doubtful any result on Election Day from Ohio is going to be accepted as credible.

    Coupled with the outrageously illegal registration activity of ACORN and the shockingly illegal actions of the Obama campaign itself and what you have is an effort to not only "count every vote" but also steal as many votes as will be necessary for Obama to win the state on Election Day." American Thinker
Everyone in Ohio knows we have these thousands of phony registrations--people were bussed in to vote during that one week of same day vote registration. Legitimate, legal early voters saw them, saw the vans, busses and out of state license plates, the "community organizers" herding their flocks, some drunk and disorderly. Now Brunner's excuse, even as ACORN admits the problem that they've signed up all these non-eligible voters (more than we have voting age citizens), her excuse is there isn't time or resources to check all these registrations before Nov. 4. The Obama campaign has hired ACORN to do its dirty deed--to steal Ohio.

Our last Governor's term ended in disgrace because of some unreported golf games with cronies and an obscure fund raiser's misdeeds. This Governor, Strickland, a former Methodist pastor, needs to get down on his knees, do some soul searching and clean house or he won't even get as high a rank (50th) as Gov. Taft.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Sub-prime, from the archives

I wrote this April 25, 2007, complaining about the way the topic was written up in USAToday. It began with the obligatory sob story, and it wasn't until the middle of the article you found what was going down. Even so, I gleaned these facts from the article (perhaps the reporter figured the editor wouldn't read that far). I haven't changed a word of it, so all this was well known 18 months ago long before we knew this meltdown was going to happen. The only words missing are CRA and ACORN. It was reported in the news, discussed on talk radio and cable panels, and commented on in the blogosphere. And still people are falling for Obama's ridiculous lies.

A closer look at the middle paragraphs:
  • Minority home buyers helped fuel the housing boom--49% of the increase between 1995-2005. [Note that this trend of "empowering" minorities by burdening them with impossible debt began under Clinton, and any attempt to reverse it has brought condemnation on Bush.]
  • 73% of high income ($92,000-$152,000) blacks and 70% of high income Hispanics had subprime loans, compared to 17% whites.
  • Lenders were supported by politicians and "community leaders" eager to promote minority home ownership.
  • When Illinois (Cook Co.) tried to establish credit counseling programs for new minority buyers by targeting ZIP codes, the program was pulled as being "racist".
  • Access became a buzz word at the expense of sound lending policies.
  • Buyers/borrowers with poor credit or low salaries who wanted a cheap deal is a large part of the problem.
  • Investigation by a counseling group found 9% of those in trouble were victims of fraud; the rest was poor judgement and poor financial skills.
  • Rather than focus on the borrowers' poor financial skills, it appears that new regulations and programs will pounce on predatory lenders.
  • Government investigations of charges even before the current problem came to light showed a "good chunk" [not my term] of higher loan cost is attributed to borrower's income, not to race or ethnicity.
But this is America, where nothing happens if it isn't about poverty, race, gender or disability.

And you wonder why I call Obama a marxist?

Actually, the real reason is all those Soviet history courses I took back in college, the PL 480 books I cataloged, and my Chinese roommate whose family lost it all under Mao, but here are three more reasons a bit more current, seen at the Taxman Blog about Obama's interview with Charlie Gibson. Gordon calls it socialism. I think B.O's well beyond that when you look at the encouragement by his campaign of sexism and misogyny, add up the millions coming from foreign countries that will never be investigated because of Congress, the thousands being illegally registered to vote in the swing states that can't be verified because of lack of staff and desire on the part of Democrat officials, and the felons in Florida swamping their ability to check. These are old tactics, maybe a bit more sophisticated than 1917 and 1949, but they still work:
    Listen to Obama's interview.

    1) He doesn't care if the capital gains rate increases Treasury receipts, he's raising it out of "fairness".

    2) Democrats refuse to drill to lessen our energy dependence, even if it means struggling workers pay more for a gallon of gas. Caribou are more important than people....


    3) Never mind that the end result of the Fannie Mae was a worldwide financial meltdown, democrats still think it's a good idea to push loans for people who cannot/will not pay them back.