Friday, May 05, 2006

2443 What profits and price gouging?

You can read the whole piece over at Amy Ridenour's National Center Blog, as reported by Peyton Knight, and this actually records a higher amount for profits than I've seen at other sites--9.7 cents per dollar of sales:

According to Ken Cohen, vice president of ExxonMobil, ". . . in the first quarter of 2006, ExxonMobil made $8.4 billion in total profits. Profits in the U.S. accounted for $2.3 billion of that total. And what did ExxonMobil pay in total government taxes in the U.S. in this first quarter? $3.7 billion. The company paid $1.4 billion more in taxes than it took in profits.

In fact, Mr. Cohen says, from 2001 to 2005, ExxonMobil's total U.S. tax bill was $57.1 billion, and its total earnings in the country were $34.9 billion. This means that over the most recent five-year period, the company paid $22.2 billion more in taxes than it earned in profits.

In 2005, he says, ExxonMobil earned 9.7 cents per dollar of sales in the U.S. To put this in perspective, he notes that pharmaceutical companies earned 17.6 cents per dollar, banks earned 19.1 cents, and household and personal products firms earned 10.9 cents.

"We are the most heavily regulated industry in the country," said Cohen. "The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) has a special branch that does nothing but regulate energy companies."

"With regard to the current climate," he noted, "We are in an election year and it appears that the candidates are more interested in running against us than running against an opponent."

When asked about his thoughts on a possible "windfall profits tax" on the oil industry, Cohen points out that "there is a history we can refer people to... it's been tried before... it really impacted citizens in the country negatively, and did not have the desired impact."

Full account here.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

It's great to see that Exxon Mobile is actually doing something proactive to counter all of the MISinformation surrounding this issue. The politcal posturing going on in Washington on this subject is infuriating to say the least. What we need, instead of finger pointing and calls for hearings and demands for increased taxes is sensible, comprehensive energy policy. And I think it should start with opening up ANWR, the Outer Continental Shelf and/or the Rockies. It should include eliminating the impediments to expanding and creating refineries in this country. It should include reducing taxes at the pump since big government makes more per dollar than the oil cos do (40 cents/ dollar vs. 10 cents/ dollar). Of course it should also include strong incentives for conservation and greater fuel efficiencies. And substantial R&D efforts to find and improve alternatives to oil.

That turned into a little bit of a rant....sorry. :)